You are viewing clifylq

AWAKENING OF AMERICA
 
[Most Recent Entries] [Calendar View] [Friends]

Below are the 20 most recent journal entries recorded in clifylq's LiveJournal:

    [ << Previous 20 ]
    Tuesday, April 2nd, 2013
    7:15 am
    THE CURE FOR CANCER FINALLY! AMERICAN'S ARE LITERALLY DIEING FROM EATING ANIMAL BASED DIETS!

    ..................  http://clifylq.livejournal.com/127275.html?mode=reply#add_comment

    WAKE THE FUCK UP AMERICA CANCER IS TOTALLY CURABLE BUT NOT IN OUR GOVERNMENT

    http://clifylq.livejournal.com/126289.html

    “Why cure cancer since the Medical Establishment in America (AMA, ACS) can profit on you ladies suffering and dying from breast cancer and still promote their population control agenda? It’s a win win situation for them and their evil being waged on the WOMEN in America today using such evil groups as Komen/Avon and their pink washing of ribbons marching you right into their bank accounts going on now for over 50 years with NO cure for cancer.” clifylq 

    LADIES what most of you may not know is that we live with cancer inside our body every day normally. Every day new cancer cells form but our immune system manages to kill them off. Our bodies fight off cancer inside us without us even knowing it. It's when a tumor forms that something is wrong but even that tumor took many years to grow that size. Cancer is a very slow growing disease. Most doctors who use the traditional treatment used today i.e., burn, slash, poison, want to rush the patent into treatment just as soon as possible. What they manage to do is to destroy the very immune system that naturally destroys cancer cells and once the kemo has worn off, the cancer comes back with a vengeance to finally kill off the patient. The cancer criminals i.e., AMA, ACS today say that if a patient lives for 5 years after the kemo that’s a success. Sick Bastards! Then there is the ugly side effects of cancer destroying the organs, hair loss, sickness etc. many victims die from the treatment vs. the cancer. As a matter of fact if the patient did not have the kemo they would probably live much longer than after the cancer treatment was performed!

    Once the kemo fails to cure the patient their doctor sends their immune destroyed victim home to die of the very disease the doctor helped kill them with. How cool is that ladies?

    The only answer to our failed medical response to cancer in America today is steer clear of the allopath’s and their bag of tricks to make you sick and make them wealthy. Ultimately you die from their helping you. It's a win win situation for their NWO bosses to destroy over 80% of the (female) population.

    Homeopaths have the right answer to curing cancer and that is to start eating a plant based diet instead of an animal based one. That's it! That's the answer to curing many of the diseases in America today including those Medical Clowns who say are not curable like, aides, HIV, diabetes, heart disease, Alzheimer’s, lupus, breast cancer and many others. Just click on to the link provided here to see other doctors and their research that reveals thousands of people who have been cured and many of them are the very patients their doctors told them to go home and die. Link

    It's time ladies to rise up in one voice and put a STOP to these criminals who run the medical profession in America today to include those who allow such totally evil companies like MONSANTO to put their poisonous seeds into our food supply via GMOs and condoned by our government. NOTE: Obama just passed the Farmer Assurance Provision. Section 735 of this bill actually grants Monsanto immunity from federal courts pending the review of any GM crop that is thought to be dangerous.  http://clifylq.livejournal.com/125800.html?mode=reply#add_comment

    What's wrong with this picture LADIES? And what are you going to do to help me put a STOP to these Mad Men over the medical community and their Nazi Storm Troopers in the FDA profiting on our suffering and deaths from their cancer? http://clifylq.livejournal.com/127275.html?mode=reply#add_comment

    clifylq

    http://clifylq.blogspot.com/
    http://clifylq.livejournal.com/
    http://cliffs3-daywalk.com/index.html
    http://supportbordercontrols.blogspot.com/

    http://www.lindquistinvestigationservices.com/

    ..... http://www.clifylq.com/

    LADIES I GIVE YOU THE CURE FOR ALL DISEASES IN AMERICA TODAY INCLUDING BREAST CANCER BUT DO YOU THINK THE EVIL KOMEN OR OTHER FRAUDS PINK WASHING THEIR CANCER CURE MARCHES LIKE AVON WILL MARCH FOR A BETTER DIET FOR US? WILL THEY RAISE MONEY TO FEED THOSE OF US WITH A DISEASE TO BUY VEGETABLES AND FRUITS AND STOP THE ANIMAL FOOD INDUSTRY CAUSING ALL OF OUR DISEASES IN AMERICA? I DON'T THINK SO SINCE THEY ARE TOO WELL PAID MARCHING FOR NO CURE FOR OVER 50 YEARS NOW. BUT STILL MANAGE TO FILL THEIR ZIO COFFERS WITH YOUR MARCH MILLIONS TO PAY THEIR EMPLOYEES HIGH SALARIES AND MARKET THEIR EVIL AGENDA OF POPULATION CONTROLS. MUST WE STILL HEAR THEIR SLOGAN "EVERYONE DESERVES A LIFE TIME" OF PAYING US YOUR MARCH MONEY FOR NO CURE TO CANCER?

    PRETTY SICK HUH? HELP ME TO HELP YOU LADIES.. Link

    Tuesday, March 26th, 2013
    11:52 am
    THE WAR AGAINST WOMEN IN AMERICA BY BIG COMPANIES AND THEIR POISENOUS PRODUCTS

    I HAVE OSTEOPOROSIS WHAT CAUSED IT AND WHAT'S THE BEST WAY TO TREAT IT?

    As a consultant I advise those who have Osteoporosis to exercise their body to help strengthen their bones. I have included recommended exercises by the NOS. I have also listed a natural means to increase your bone density vs. using what is called “Eating Rocks” mentality of companies pandering calcium supplements that are really mined rocks from sand stone and limestone quarries. The body can’t breakdown these elements and throws them off to be stored to cause arthritis and God knows what other ailments. It’s not normal to put anything but natural substances in your body not rocks that the body can’t get rid of. So what’s the answer then?

    Here is part of the acknowledgement section of my new ebook on osteoporosis:

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

    America the evil we face in our country is so vast and not unlike an onion in that trying to peel it to its core, every peel reveals yet another worse fate for us to suffer from. I know that it is difficult for the average person to believe that our own evil government is trying to kill off the population but it’s unfortunately very true!

    In simply trying to help a friend who was diagnosed with osteoporosis to find a good calcium supplement, I found out that what is being displayed in stores like Costco in plastic jars at a reduced price and sounding like a great deal turns out to be in essence selling rocks to their consumers to eat.

    Yes that’s right rocks most of the calcium being used and marketed as calcium supplements today are being mined from rock quarries such as marble and sandstone. Almost every calcium supplement on the market is made from marble or limestone. If you look at your current calcium product, the supplements facts box will call it "calcium carbonate" or "calcium citrate" or some other name, but it is simply ground up rocks! You wouldn't think of making a peanut butter and marble sandwich, or a lemon and limestone pie, so why eat rock calcium supplements?

    You might have wondered why your calcium pills are large and hard to swallow, then constipate and causes digestive discomfort. Now you know why! But tolerability issues are just the tip of the iceberg warning us of more sinister problems with rock based calcium supplements.

    This ebook I’ve written is for my friend to help her with osteoporosis but now I’m offering what I found to be the best calcium supplements using natural foods vs. rocks that may be the cause of heart attacks, or arthritis from the un-used rocks you ingested and are placed in the various parts of our bodies later to cause a variety of problems.

    In addition this ebook tells how to prevent osteoporosis and get calcium the natural way in plants and minerals vs. rocks and how to strengthen your bones.


    “OSTEOPOROSIS TREATMENT & CAUSES TO BE AWARE OF”
    by Cliff Lindquist, http://www.cliffs3-daywalk.com

    LADIES DID YOU KNOW THAT SIMPLY COOKING FOR YOUR FAMILY CAN KILL THEM?

    A new study published in the International Journal of Electrochemical Science has discovered that cooking with aluminium increases the risk of developing Osteoporosis and Alzheimer’s Disease.

    The human body can tolerate 1mg of aluminium per 1kg of bone weight before it begins to accumulate in the brain.

    ASTONISHINGLY, it was found that up to 139.2 milligrams of aluminium per person could be consumed in one meal depending on how the food was prepared.

    It is common practice around the world to cook, prepare and store food in aluminium. When aluminium is cold, leakage into food is minimal. However, when food is prepared in environments above 150c (302f), aluminium leakage into food becomes alarming.

    The researchers examined five different types of meat (beef, water buffalo, mutton, chicken, and turkey) that were packed in aluminium foil and cooked in ovens at various temperatures above 150c.

    They found that aluminium concentration exploded by 378% in red meats and 215% in poultry.

    It was also identified that fat content in meat, in addition to the cooking process, impacted on how much aluminium was found in food.

    It was also identified that fat content in meat, in addition to the cooking process, impacted on how much aluminium was found in food.

    It was also revealed that highly acidic foods wrapped in aluminium foil contained twice the amount of aluminium and that the size of an aluminium cooking pan also determined how much aluminium leaked into food.

    Food manufacturers frequently use aluminium to store and preserve food. It’s cheap and highly malleable. However, there are ways to reduce your intake of aluminium from your diet.

    WHAT ABOUT COOKING ITEMS MADE WITH ALUMINUM LIKE MY RICE COOKER?

    We cook rice and grains frequently, as do many Asian-Americans. We have used plastic-bowl microwave vessels, aluminum & teflon pots, steam pressure cookers and several others over the past five plus decades. They all work, but each has a down side.

    We feared aluminum toxicity, teflon ingestion, plastic leaching and plain uncertainty of what new epidemiologic research will unleash on us tomorrow. My wife and I have conveniently labeled our failing intellects as chronic "rice-in" toxicity. Forget age, it must be all that peeling cooking pot and rice!

    What should we use to cook rice for our family that is safe for us then?

    How to Reduce Aluminium from Your Diet:
    “OSTEOPOROSIS TREATMENT & CAUSES TO BE AWARE OF”
    by Cliff Lindquist, http://www.cliffs3-daywalk.com

    LADIES HOW MANY OF YOU DRINK OUT OF WATER BOTTLES?

    Do you know what bottled water company has FLOURIDE FREE water?

    Did you know Aqua Fena is a great tasting water but it is made by Coca Cola the same company that makes Gatoraid and both are made from tap water?

    If you want an example of two companies engaged in hyping worthless beverages, look no further than Coke and Pepsi. In my opinion, both of these companies operate with an astonishing lack of integrity -- not only in the way they hype their bottled water products, but also in their ongoing marketing of beverages that I am convinced are closely tied to the obesity and diabetes pandemics now ravaging our world.

    Coke and Pepsi have, in my opinion, played a significant role in the destruction of human health among advanced nations over the last three generations. Not only do they aggressively market disease-promoting beverages containing high-fructose corn syrup (linked to diabetes) and phosphoric acid (linked to osteoporosis), but they also use another chemical substance in their diet drinks that many naturopathic practitioners consider to be a neurological poison: Aspartame!

    Knowing the true history of Coca-Cola and Pepsi it's no surprise that these two companies would find a way to dishonestly market bottled water products, too. Failing to disclose the real source of these bottled water products is, in my view, an inexcusable lapse in corporate responsibility. I have no doubt that whatever products these two companies may market in the future, they will always be marketed in a way that is dishonest, harmful to human health and damaging to the environment.

    Then which bottled water is safe for me to drink?
    “OSTEOPOROSIS TREATMENT & CAUSES TO BE AWARE OF”
    by Cliff Lindquist, http://www.cliffs3-daywalk.com

    LADIES DO YOU KNOW WHAT IS THE BEST WAY TO FILTER OUT FLOURIDE FROM YOUR DRINKING WATER AT YOUR HOME?

    Many of you use the reverse osmosis technique but for it to actually work it must be with same high pressure that is maintained commercially by bottled water companies. Not a home facsimile of one. To insure you are safe from fluoride poisoning at home you must also include an additional filter on your drinking tap water inside the home.

    I use Brita to filter my drinking water from fluoride is that safe?

    Other more common filtration methods such as Brita filters, boiling your water and freezing your water do not remove fluoride from your water. Brita does NOT remove fluoride!! Nor does freezing or boiling it!!

    Does the Alumina Filters work then to filter out fluoride?

    NOTE: “We do not recommend the use of Alumina as a fluoride reduction filter. If your water's chemistry is not just right, aluminum can leach into the water. Alumina has a very short shelf life (3 to 4 months) and won't remove chlorine, pesticides or THM's. Alumina imparts a bitter taste to your water so it is necessary to add carbon filtration as the last step or stage.

    So what is the best recommended filtration system that does remove the fluoride and other bad elements in my drinking water?

    This type of filtration is used to reduce/remove heavy metals like cadmium, lead, iron, mercury, copper, manganese, aluminum, zinc, arsenic, nickel, fertilizers, radio-nuclides, pesticides, radium, uranium and herbicides.  It is the chosen media for fish farming and has been shown to remove Dichlorvos (Nuvan), Tributyl Tin Oxide and Malochite Green as well as turbidity and odors.  It is excellent for removing fluoride and is safe for all water applications. The Answer is;

    “OSTEOPOROSIS TREATMENT & CAUSES TO BE AWARE OF”
    by Cliff Lindquist, http://www.cliffs3-daywalk.com

    LADIES DO YOU EVEN KNOW WHAT IT IS YOU ARE COOKING WITH IN YOUR KITCHEN TODAY? I MEAN REALLY?... LET'S TEST YOU,-

    Do any of you know what used to be called, "Rape Seed Oil?" Believe it or not the FDA banned it back in the 50's from consumers for its high toxic ness but the Canadians brought it back in the 70's and changed its name to Canola Oil. Do any of you ladies use Canola Oil for cooking your food? If you do it will interest you to know that Canola Oil is being used as a pesticide by such companies as "Lilly Miller VEGOL Year-Round Pesticidal Oil." (Made with 96% Canola Oil).

    PRETTY SICK HUH??

    Check out this video that helps put a finer point on what Canola Oil really is and how such company's as "Cisco" gets away with selling you cooking oil/pesticide to cook your families food.

    ARE YOU EATING PESTICIDES? CANOLA OIL GREAT INSECT KILLER

    Canola oil is a very effective insecticide, and it is the primary ingredient in many "organic" (non-chemical) pesticide control products sprayed on vegetables to kill bugs. I covered this in my "canola oil pesticide" video : http://tv.naturalnews.com/v.asp?v=AEE77E1636E97778AB05E6F31D6B1C27

    CLICK THIS LINK TO GET CLIFYLQ'S 17 WAYS TO STAY HEALTHY AND AVOID SICKNESS http://www.clifylq.com/natural-cures-for-cancer/#comment-143

    LADIES LIKE I SAID ABOVE THERE IS A WAR GOING ON AGAINST YOU AND ALL AMERICANS TO DESTROY OUR WAY OF LIFE. WHETHER IT BE IN OUR EATING HABITS, DRINKING HABITS, BREATHING OR TREATMENT THEY ARE BEHIND A VERY SINISTER PLAN TO DESTROY US ALL!! WAKE UP TO WHAT I AM SAYING HERE IN MY 80 PAGE EBOOK ON OSTEOPOROSIS. IT’S FREE ONCE YOU ORDER MY 108 PAGE EBOOK CALLED “THE QUACKS WHO CURED CANCER”.

    ORDER:


    “OSTEOPOROSIS TREATMENT & CAUSES TO BE AWARE OF”
    by Cliff Lindquist, http://www.cliffs3-daywalk.com



    clifylq

    http://clifylq.blogspot.com/
    http://clifylq.livejournal.com/
    http://cliffs3-daywalk.com/index.html
    http://supportbordercontrols.blogspot.com/

    http://www.lindquistinvestigationservices.com/


    http://supportbordercontrols.blogspot.com/2013/03/there-is-war-going-on-against-women-in.html#links



    Current Mood: Mad
    Sunday, March 24th, 2013
    10:01 am
    WOMEN BEWARE-MAMMOGRAPHY TESTING & PINK RIBBON CURE FOR CANCER FRAUD!

    .................................http://cliffs3-daywalk.com/


    WOMEN BEWARE-MAMMOGRAPHY TESTING & PINK RIBBON CURE FOR CANCER FRAUD!

    August 6, 2012
    By Lilly O'Brien -


    All across America, men and women participate in “run for the cure” events, raising tens of millions of dollars each year that go into the hands of Komen for the Cure. What these people don’t know is that much of that money is spent on “free” mammograms. Those mammograms, in turn, actually cause breast cancer because they subject women to high doses of ionizing radiation. (naturalnews.com)

    Monday, August 06, 2012 by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger Naturalnews.com reports:

    Women’s Mammography Testing & Cure for Cancer Pink Ribbon a Fraud!

    The Susan G. Komen scam, in essence, is to raise money that’s used to give women cancer and create a financial windfall for the very same companies that financially support Komen in the first place. “The Komen Foundation owns stock in General Electric, one of the largest makers of mammogram machines in the world. It also owns stock in several pharmaceutical companies, including AstraZeneca,” reports Tony Isaacs at NaturalNews


    “DuPont, another huge chemical company and major polluter, supplies much of the film used in mammography machines. Both DuPont and GE aggressively promote mammography screening of women in their 40s, despite the risk of its contributing to breast cancer in that age group. And while biotech giant Monsanto sponsors Breast Cancer Awareness Month‘s high profile event, the Race for the Cure, it continues to profit from the production of many known carcinogens.” (http://www.tbyil.com/breast-cancer-deception.htm)

    The bottom line? Komen deceives women while powerful corporations rake in the profits. This isn’t merely my own opinion. Two prominent doctors, in an article published in the British Medical Journal, have sharply condemned Komen for the Cure for lying about the “benefits” of mammograms.

    Their names? Steven Woloshin and Lisa Schwartz, directors of the Center for Medicine and the Media at Dartmouth Medical School in Hanover, New Hampshire.They join a growing number of other doctors and medical professionals who now see Komen for the Cure as afundraising fraudand are going public with detailed accusations against Komen’s deceptions.In the recently published BMJ article, Woloshin and Schwartz accused Komen of lying in its promotional propaganda for the 2011 Breast Cancer Awareness Month. In advertising, Komen falsely claimed the 5-year survival rate when breast cancer is caught early is 98%, while only 23% when not “caught early.” This is how Komen tricks women into getting more mammograms which cause more cancer — by claiming “early detection saves lives.” But it’s not science; it’s pure propaganda.

    According to study authors Woloshin and Schwartz, Komen willfully ignored “a growing and increasingly accepted body of evidence [showing] that although screening may reduce a woman’s chance of dying from breast cancer by a small amount, it also causes major harms.”

    Here’s an image published by the British Medical Journal, detailing how Komen for the Cure is lying about mammography: http://www.naturalnews.com/gallery/articles/Komen_Deception_BMJ.jpg


    How mammograms kill women


    Woloshin and Schwartz explain that anywhere from 20% to 50% of women who receive mammograms for a decade of their lives will have at least one “false alarm.”These false alarms often lead to women being treated with deadly chemotherapy cocktails. These expensive drugs enrich the very same drug companies that donate money to Komen for the Cure. This is all part of the cycle of fraudthat exploits women’s bodies for profit, all while conducting this sick fraud with the message of “finding a cure,” emblazoned with pink ribbons. The magnitude of the deception in all this is pathological… even criminal.

    That harm often comes in the form of unnecessary chemotherapy that poisons womenbut financially benefits the drug companies. Here’s another article on NaturalNews which also supports this conclusion:

    Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/036711_Komen_for_the_Cure_mammography_fraud.html#ixzz22mpGZyX2




    Corporate Partners

    Komen’s corporate partners include General Mills, Zumba Fitness, Walgreens, The Republic of Tea, REMAX, New Balance, American Airlines, Bank of America, Ford Motor Company, Dell and many more

    Susan G. Komen for the Cure is dedicated to setting new standards for creative collaboration in the fight against breast cancer.

    Our corporate partners provide us with the opportunity to reach people where they live, work, and play. In addition to a financial contribution, each of these organizations have found a unique way to get their customers and employees involved in raising young awareness and hope that we will one-day find the cures. We thank them for their commitment to the fight to end breast cancer. There are 125 plus partners you are familar with the brands that use the cure for cancer PINK RIBBON to make you support their FRAUD.  Click Here to check out the 125 partners brand names.
    http://ww5.komen.org/corporatepartners.aspx

    Obscene executive salaries

    “Susan G. Komen for the Cure is a multimillion-dollar company with assets totaling over $390 million . Only 20.9% of these funds were reportedly used in the 2009-2010 fiscal year for research “for the cure,”

    writes Emily Michele at Alternet (http://www.alternet.org/story/154010/i_will_not_be_pinkwashed%3A_kome…)

    She goes on to explain, “I don’t know about you, but I would never expect directors of a charitable “non-profit” organization to make more than most doctors, lawyers, or even politicians. Their CEO and president, Hala G. Moddelmog, made $531,924, plus $26,683 in change. That’s more than President Obama makes.”

    Komen spends about 39% of its money on “public health education,” which is just another way to say “pinkwashing.” This money is used to catapult the Komen propaganda so that future fundraising events can raise even more money, much of which is paid to Komen’s fat cat executives as cushy salaries.

    Just remember: When you run for the cure, a significant portion of the money you raise is going straight into the pockets of wealthy Komen executives. None of the money is actually being used to promote vitamin D or cancer prevention. “Detection,” after all, is not prevention. It’s just a way to push the cancer industry’s agenda of treating more women with toxic chemotherapy chemicals (and more ionizing radiation).

    Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/036711_Komen_for_the_Cure_mammography_fraud.html#ixzz22mrDRTBI





    Are you going to support PINK RIBBON PRODUCTS and take the MAMMOGRAPHY?

    Exposed: 10 Facts about the Breast Cancer Industry You’re Not Supposed to Know

    Myth #2: Pink ribbon products are sold to raise money to support breast cancer victims.

    The Truth: Nearly 100% of the funds are used to recruit more breast cancer patients into highly-lucrative treatments that do more harm than good.

    You know where all that money goes that you donate to the “search for the cure” and other cancer scams? Virtually none of it goes to actually teach women how to prevent cancer. The World Health Organization says 70% of all cancers are preventable, but the breast cancer industry helps zero percentof women actually prevent it.

    Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/024536_cancer_women_breast.html#ixzz22mt5Ojsh


    Myth #5: Regular mammograms are the best way to detect cancer

    The Truth: Mammograms harm 10 women for every one woman they help


    Myth #7: The cancer non-profits are searching for a cure for cancer

    The Truth: Even if one was found, they would never allow a cure to be publicized: It would destroy the cancer treatment industry. It’s the great scam of the cancer industry: We’re searching for a cure, they claim! Never mind the fact that they’ve been using this same con since the late 60's, when they claimed to be only a few million dollars away from curing cancer forever.

    Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/024536_cancer_women_breast.html#ixzz22ms5esX

    Are these results because we are taking the mammography? Graph shows North America, Europe, and Australia that force you to take the mammography have the largest numbers of cancer….Figure that one out.   Do your research. http://kojoreport.com/women-beware-mammography-testing-pink-ribbon-cure-for-cancer-fraud/

     - See more at: http://kojoreport.com/women-beware-mammography-testing-pink-ribbon-cure-for-cancer-fraud/#sthash.O6co6oir.dpuf

    clifylq


    http://clifylq.blogspot.com/
    http://clifylq.livejournal.com/
    http://cliffs3-daywalk.com/index.html
    http://ravediet.com/?PARTNER=RDLCL
    http://supportbordercontrols.blogspot.com/
    http://www.lindquistinvestigationservices.com/

    http://www.whale.to/a/mammography_h.html

    Women’s Mammography Testing & Cure for Cancer Pink Ribbon a Fraud!

    The Susan G. Komen scam, in essence, is to raise money that’s used to give women cancer and create a financial windfall for the very same companies that financially support Komen in the first place. “The Komen Foundation owns stock in General Electric, one of the largest makers of mammogram machines in the world. It also owns stock in several pharmaceutical companies, including AstraZeneca,” reports Tony Isaacs

    DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT LADIES HERE: .http://cliffs3-daywalk.com/



    Current Mood: Mad
    Tuesday, March 12th, 2013
    5:10 pm
    KOMEN/AVON BREAST CANCER DECEPTION - HIDING THE TRUTH BEHIND A SEA OF PINK

    http://www.tbyil.com/breast-cancer-deception.htm

    BREAST CANCER DECEPTION - HIDING THE TRUTH BEHIND A SEA OF PINK

    By Tony Isaacs

    Every year October is Breast Cancer Awareness Month and we find the country awash in a sea of pink

    from shore to shore – from pink ribbons and donation boxes to pink products, charity promotions,

    celebrities by the score and even pink cleats on NFL players. Tragically, few people are aware of the dark history of Breast Cancer Awareness Month (BCAM) and the players past and present who have misused it to direct people and funds away from finding a true cure while covering up their own roles in causing and profiting from cancer.

    The Founding of Breast Cancer Awareness Month

    Most people are unaware that the BCAM idea was conceived and paid for by the British chemical company Imperial Chemical Industries (ICI), a company that both profited from the ever-growing

    cancer epidemic and contributed to its causes. The American subsidiary of Imperial Chemical Industries, ICI/Astra-Zeneca manufactures tamoxifen, the world's top-selling cancer drug used for breast cancer. ICI itself is in the business of manufacturing and selling synthetic chemicals and is one of the world’s largest producers and users of chlorine.

    Although BCAM was co-founded along with two non-profit organizations and some big name companies were quick to associate with BCAM, for the first several years, BCAM's bills were paid by ICI’s Zeneca Pharmaceuticals.

    As the controlling sponsor of Breast Cancer Awareness Month (BCAM), Zeneca was able to approve—or

    veto—any promotional or informational materials, posters, advertisements, etc. that BCAM uses. The focus is strictly limited to information regarding early detection and treatment, avoiding the topic of prevention and the role toxins may play. A further look at the major players in breast cancer awareness may give plenty of insight as to why a growing number of critics are asking why such is the case.

    Take Zeneca for example, which later merged into Astra-Zeneca and in 2008, ICI/Astra-Zeneca changed its name to AzkoNobel and reported annual sales of over 22 Billion Dollars. ICI has long been among the world’s largest manufacturers of pesticides, plastics, and pharmaceuticals. Its Perry, Ohio, chemical plant was once identified as the third-largest source of potential cancer-causing pollution in the United States, releasing 53,000 pounds of recognized carcinogens into the air in 1996.

    After Zeneca acquired the Salick chain of cancer treatment centers in 1997 and then merged with the Swedish pharmaceutical company Astra to form AstraZeneca, creating the world's third-largest

    drug concern, Dr. Samuel Epstein, a professor of occupational and environmental medicine at the

    University of Illinois School of Public Health stated, “This is a conflict of interest unparalleled in the history of American medicine.”

    “You've got a company that's a spinoff of one of the world's biggest manufacturers of carcinogenic chemicals, they've got control of breast cancer treatment, they've got control of the chemoprevention [studies], and now they have control of cancer treatment in eleven centers-which are clearly going to be prescribing the drugs they manufacture."

    The breakdown of $14 Billion in profits for ICI in 1997 was 49 percent from pesticides and other industrial chemicals, another 49 percent from pharmaceutical sales, and the remaining 2 percent from health care services including 11 cancer treatment centers. Zeneca’s herbicide acetochlor, which is classified by the EPA as a "probable human carcinogen", and which AstraZeneca sold until a corporate reorganization in 2000, accounted for around $300 million in sales in 1997. Their product tamoxifen citrate (Nolvadex) accounted for $500 million in 1997 sales. Cancer prevention would clearly conflict with Zeneca’s business plan.

    Quickly jumping onboard the tamoxifen bandwagon was the National Cancer Institute, which announced in April 1998 that breast cancer could be ‘prevented’ by treating women continuously with a

    powerful drug called tamoxifen. The New York Times editorialized on April 8th that treating women

    with tamoxifen is a ‘breast cancer breakthrough.’ However, The Times acknowledged that treating

    1,000 women with tamoxifen for five years would prevent 17 breast cancers but would cause an

    additional 12 cases of endometrial cancer and 20 cases of serious blood clots in the same 1,000

    women.

    As recent studies have shown, the risks implied in those less-than breakthrough figures were vastly understated. For example, as Natural News reported in 2009, a study published in Cancer Research concluded that long-term use of tamoxifen actually increases the risk of getting aggressive cancer in the other breast by 440 percent.

    See:

    http://www.naturalnews.com/027123_cancer_Tamoxifen_brst_cancer.html

    Other large corporations which contribute to breast cancer awareness also have a vested interest in breast cancer. In many instances, these not only profit from cancer, they also sell products which cause cancer. Thus, at the same time that they promote their products they also help direct research and treatments away from their toxic and cancer causing products.

    General Electric sells upwards of $100 million annually in mammography machines. General Electric has also been a major polluter of carcinogenic PCBs in the Hudson River. An estimated million pounds of PCBs lie buried at the bottom of a 40-mile stretch of the Hudson, where GE dumped PCB oil until the mid-1970s, contaminating the entire 200-mile length of the river below Hudson Falls.

    DuPont, another huge chemical company and major polluter, supplies much of the film used in

    mammography machines. Both DuPont and GE aggressively promote mammography screening of women in their 40s, despite the risk of its contributing to breast cancer in that age group.

    Biotech giant Monsanto is a major sponsor Breast Cancer Awareness Month's high profile event, the Race for the Cure. At the same time, Monsanto reaps huge profits from products which cause breast

    and other cancers. Monsanto's genetically engineered bovine growth hormone, rBGH, is widely used to to increase milk production in cows and milk with rBGH contains up to 10 times the naturally occurring growth hormone Insulin-like Growth Factor I (IGF-1). Studies have shown that women with elevated levels of IGF-1 are 7 times more likely to develop pre-menopausal breast cancer and the hormone has been identified as one of the leading risk factors for breast cancer as well as colon and prostate cancer.

    A study published in the October, 2012 edition of the journal Food and Chemical Toxicology provided unprecedented evidence of the cancer causing dangers of the combination of Monsanto's genetically modified corn and Monsanto's herbicide Roundup, which the corn was modified to withstand. Female rats fed GMO corn treated with Roundup developed large mammary tumors more often than and before controls and died 2 - 3 times faster than control groups. The pituitary was the second most disabled organ. Treated male rats developed 4 times more large tumors than controls and the tumor development occurred up to 600 days earlier, primarily in the livers and kidneys.

    Another large player is Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMS), with their Tour of Hope and promotions such as

    10 cent donations for drug store sales of selected BMS products. BMS is also the manufacturer of

    Taxol (under the trade name of Paclitaxel), considered to be “the gold standard” of chemo drugs.


    As Natural News reported earlier this month, the so-called “gold standard” has more than lost its luster, as was presented at 27th Annual San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium:

    "German investigators from Friedrich-Schiller University in Jena, have shown that taxol (the "gold standard of chemo") causes a massive release of cells into circulation.

    "Such a release of cancer cells would result in extensive metastasis months or even years later, long after the chemo would be suspected as the cause of the spread of the cancer. This little known horror of conventional cancer treatment needs to be spread far and wide, but it is not even listed in the side effects of taxol."

    See:

    http://www.tbyil.com/Chemo_Does_Not_Cure.htm

    Nowhere is the hypocrisy of the Breast Cancer Awareness Movement more evident than in the actions

    of "do good" cosmetic and body care companies, including such industry powerhouses as Estée Lauder, Avon, Revlon, and Mary Kay. Annually, they market pink-ribboned packaged cosmetics and

    body care products as well as contribute funds which help continue the cover-up up and misdirection of breast cancer research, treatment and prevention. Many of the same products they push as part of their campaign contribute to breast and other cancer.

    Hormone-mimicking chemicals such as parabens and phthalates have been shown to increase the risk of breast cancer and have a broad range of birth defects. A study published in the Journal of Applied Toxicology in 2012 detected paraben esters in 99 percent of breast cancer tissues sampled.

    The list of corporate donors and players in Breast Cancer Awareness goes on and on, including other chemical and pharmaceutical companies, cosmetic companies, fast food restaurants, donut and cookie makers, and many more. They all share the common traits of promoting “awareness” while excluding the role their own products play, and promoting early screening through mammograms.


    Likewise, other charities and foundations – and their sponsors - have joined the pink bandwagon, and once again, they have common links of promoting early detection, primarily through mammograms, and remaining mostly silent about toxins and other environmental factors.

    The Foundations and Charities

    A pink giant among breast cancer foundations is the Susan G. Komen Breast Cancer Foundation, famous for their annual Race for the Cure®, and which has a huge list of corporate sponsors, including such notables as General Mills and Mars Snackfoods among their Million Dollar Elite club. The Komen Foundation has a lengthy list of risk factors, yet does not list exposure to toxins among them;

    See:

    http://ww5.komen.org/breastcancer/loweryourrisk.html

    As noted in the 2003 article “Compromised”: “Participants in the Race for the Cure are often greeted as they cross the finish line with live music, inspirational speakers and acres of colorfully adorned corporate booths. Pink, the chosen color of the international breast cancer movement, is everywhere, on hats, T-shirts, teddy bears and ribbons. A sense of community and camaraderie pervades the celebration by thousands of breast cancer survivors and friends of survivors.”

    "What's missing is the truth," says Judy Brady of the Toxic Links Coalition in San Francisco. She wants to see a cure for breast cancer as much as anyone, but she and her group, along with several other activist breast cancer groups, have something to point out about the Susan G. Komen Foundation's activities:

    "There's no talk about prevention except, in terms of lifestyle, your diet for instance. No talk about ways to grow food more safely. No talk about how to curb industrial carcinogens. No talk about contaminated water."

    Source: http://tampa.creativeloafing.com/gyrobase/Content?oid=oid:3332

    Though giving some lip service to the “debate over mammograms”, the Komen Foundation nevertheless

    promotes mammograms as an important screening tool and recommends that women get regular mammograms starting at age 40, stating that “despite some ongoing debate, mammography is still the

    best screening tool widely used today for the early detection of breast cancer.”




    The Komen Foundation owns stock in General Electric, one of the largest makers of mammogram machines in the world. It also reportedly owns stock in several pharmaceutical companies, including AstraZeneca (now AzkoNobel).

    AstraZeneca has long been a Komen booster, making educational grants to Komen and having a visible

    presence at the Race For the Cure. At the 1998 Food and Drug Administration hearings, the Komen

    Foundation was the only national breast cancer group to endorse the AstraZeneca cancer treatment

    drug tamoxifen as a prevention device for healthy but high-risk women, despite vehement opposition by most other breast cancer groups because of its links to uterine cancer.

    Another prominent breast cancer organization is The National Breast Cancer Foundation, whose stated mission is “to save lives by increasing awareness of breast cancer through education and by providing mammograms for those in need.” Their National Mammography Program includes the “Donate a Free Mammogram Program”. Their education includes nothing about the toxins and environmental causes of cancer.

    Similarly, the Prevent Cancer Foundation, gives advice on how to prevent and detect cancer, but fails to include toxins and environmental factors and is yet another foundation which heavily promotes mammograms. Currently, they are promoting their “Pledge to Screen Your Boobs & Enter to Win a Pink Vespa™” program, seeking donations and stating that “early detection and screening can help to stop breast cancer before it strikes”.

    In other words, according to the various foundations and organizations which advocate screening and mammograms, the way to “stop cancer before it strikes” is to detect it after it has already struck.

    The following report from a woman who used natural therapies to beat a cancer mainstream doctors had said was terminal typifies how foundations such Susan G. Komen and others entrenched in the cancer industry look upon anything outside the mainstream paradigm:

    "I was shocked an appalled when I tried to contact every single person of importance at Susan G. foundation. I had completed my traditional therapies, my stage IV metastatic disease was said to be terminal and yet here I am! No Evidence of Disease!

    "I was euphoric and feel like God personally guided me through this process. Immediately I faxed,

    called, emailed dozens of people at Susan G. Komen foundation to let them know they can stop running.

    "The only contacts I received were when they wanted me to give them money, 'To help find a cure.'


    Haha! "I was shocked, betrayed, appalled and sickened that no one in the research department would call me back,...I got their fax and faxed off a release of information and also my scans,....proof!

    Still,...no call back.

    "The advocacy group I used stated that all foundations were like this.

    "They don't really want to find a cure, they want to keep searching and doing experiments so that they can keep their jobs.

    "I beat my disease, (i didn't say cured) and no one cared,...not a one. No media, no doctor, no foundation gave (me) the time of day."

    The American Cancer Society – The World’s Most Profitable Non-Profit

    If the Komen Foundation is a giant among breast cancer charities, the true 800 pound gorilla in all of the cancer non-profit organizations is the highly profitable American Cancer Society (ACS).

    As reported in "American Cancer Society: The World's Wealthiest 'Non-profit' Institution'' in the

    International Journal of Health Services, the ACS “is fixated on damage control - screening, diagnosis and treatment, - and genetic research, with indifference or even hostility to cancer prevention. Together with the National Cancer Institute (NCI), the ACS has failed to provide Congress, regulatory agencies and the public with the strong body of scientific evidence clearly relating the escalating incidence of non-smoking related cancers to involuntary and avoidable exposures to industrial carcinogens in air, water, the workplace, and consumer products - - food, cosmetics and toiletries - - so that appropriate corrective and legislative regulatory and action has not been taken.”

    Like the other foundations mentioned earlier, the ACS has myriad ties to industries which profit from and contribute to cancer. One such relationship is the one they have maintained with AstraZeneca. Together with the NCI, in 1992 the ACS launched am aggressive "chemoprevention" program aimed at recruiting 16,000 healthy women who were supposedly at "high risk'' of breast cancer into a 5-year clinical trial of Zeneca’s tamoxifen. The women were told that the drug was essentially harmless, and that it could reduce their risk of breast cancer. What the women were not told was that tamoxifen was well-known to induce aggressive human uterine cancer or that it has previously been shown to be a highly potent liver carcinogen in rodent tests.

    Other ties include board members tied to such companies as Glaxo-SmithKline Smith, Glaxo Welcome,

    Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, Block Drug Company, Reliant Pharmaceuticals,

    OSI Pharmaceuticals, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Various Lobbying Firms, Venture Capitalists,

    Sherwin-Williams Company and many others.

    To get a better picture of some of the interlocking relationships between ACS board members and the corporations and institutions they are connected with, see:

    http://www.muckety.com/8902C522F22BE4F05D7BB23676ADEB8B.map

    Among a great many questionable actions by the ACS that have been interpreted to be favorable to

    such institutions and industries in the past are:

    * The ACS opposed proposed regulations in 1977-78 for hair coloring products that contained dyes suspected of causing breast cancer. In so doing, the ACS ignored the fact that these chemicals were proven liver and breast carcinogens.

    * In 1982, the ACS adopted a highly restrictive cancer policy that insisted on unequivocal human evidence of carcinogenicity before taking any position on public health hazards. Accordingly, the ACS still trivializes or rejects evidence of carcinogenicity in experimental animals, and has actively campaigned against laws that ban deliberate addition to food of any amount of any additive shown to cause cancer in either animals or humans.

    * In 1992, the ACS issued a joint statement with the Chlorine Institute in support of the continued global use of organochlorine pesticides despite clear evidence that some such pesticides were known to cause breast cancer. In the joint statement, ACS Vice President Clark Heath, M.D., dismissed evidence of the risks as "preliminary and mostly based on weak and indirect association."

    * In September 1996, the ACS together with a diverse group of patient and physician organizations, filed a "citizen's petition" to pressure FDA to ease restrictions on access to silicone gel breast implants. What the ACS did not disclose was that the gel in these implants had were also contaminated with other potent carcinogens such as ethylene oxide and crystalline silica.

    The ACS is called “the worlds wealthiest non-profit” for good reason. Despite annually pleading

    poverty and huge fundraising efforts across the nation, at the end of 2008, the combined ACS financial statements reflected net assets of over $1.5 Billion.

    A 1992 article in the Wall Street Journal by Thomas DiLorenzo, professor of economics at Loyola

    College and veteran investigator of nonprofit organizations, revealed that the Texas affiliate of the ACS owned more than $11 million worth of assets in land and real estate, as well as more than fifty-six vehicles, including eleven Ford Crown Victorias for senior executives and forty-five other cars assigned to staff members. Arizona's ACS chapter spent less than 10 percent of its funds on direct community cancer services. In California, the figure was 11 percent, and under 9 percent in Missouri.

    Thus for every $1 spent on direct service in 1992, approximately $6.40 was spent on compensation and overhead. In all ten states, salaries and fringe benefits are by far the largest single budget items, a surprising fact in light of the characterization of the appeals, which stress an urgent and critical need for donations to provide cancer services. Nationally, only 16 percent or less of all money the ACS raised was spent on direct services to cancer victims, like driving cancer patients from the hospital after chemotherapy, and providing pain medication.

    In the intervening years, the ACS has reported spending a larger percentage of the money it raises on program services, with 26% going to direct services and another 47% being spent on research,

    prevention and detection/treatment services. Unfortunately, the research funds are directed

    almost entirely to the same surgery, chemo and radiation therapies that have failed to win the war

    on cancer for almost four decades now. Likewise, prevention and detection/treatment services overlook toxins and environmental causes and promote more screening and mammograms.

    It is a tried and failed program of the same forms of prevention, treatment and research that has

    benefited those who profit from continuing the largely failed war on cancer while obscuring and

    protecting the roles of those who have caused it.

    Mammograms and the Dangers of RadiationA study by researchers from the University of Nebraska and the John H. Stroger Jr. Hospital of Cook County, Ill cast fresh doubt on the widespread assumption that regular mammograms save lives, showing that 2,970 women must be screened for breast cancer in order to prevent even one death.

    "For a woman in the screening subset of mammography-detectable cancers, there is a less than 5

    percent chance that a mammogram will save her life," wrote the researchers.

    In 2001, a study known as the Cochrane analysis found that if 2,000 women underwent regular screening for 10 years, one life would be saved but another 10 women would undergo unnecessary

    treatment such as surgery or radiation. Noting that it was difficult to determine which cancers would have led to death or even symptoms in the absence of treatment, the researchers concluded that it is "not clear whether screening does more harm than good."

    Few will debate the value of early screening and detection, but what most doctors will not tell you, and many are unaware of, is that there is a much safer and more effective tool for early screening: thermography. As was reported in Natural News last December, a breast thermogram has the ability to identify a breast abnormality five to ten years before the problem can be found on a mammogram. Furthermore, a thermogram does not use radiation, and can be done as frequently as anyone thinks is necessary. Thermograms work by creating infra-red images (heat pictures) that are then analyzed to find asymmetries anywhere in the chest and underarm area. Breast thermography detects patterns of heat generated by the increased circulation produced by abnormal metabolic activity in cancer cells. This activity occurs long before a cancer starts to invade new tissue.

    See:

    http://www.naturalnews.com/025170_cancer_thermograms_brst_cancer.html

    Mastectomies – Prevention or Unnecessary Mutilation?

    As a result of mammograms and MRI’s, many women, with the advice and consent of their doctors, opt to have radical mastectomies, which involves removal of one or both breasts along with underlying muscle tissue and lymph nodes under the arm. However, many researchers say that mastectomies are

    unnecessary for most women suffering from breast cancer.

    Two studies published in the New England Journal of Medicine in 2002 showed cutting out just the

    lumps of diseased tissue can save as many lives as removing the whole breast. Findings of the studies showed similar death rates after 20 years for large groups of women who underwent either mastectomies or breast-saving surgery.

    A study of 1,851 women at the University of Pittsburgh found little survival differences between two similar groups. A similar study was done at the European Institute of Oncology in Milan where 701 women were split into two groups, one of which received mastectomies and the other had lumps

    removed and radiation treatment. About a quarter of each group died of breast cancer over 20 years.

    According to researchers, survival does not depend on such surgery because breast cancer is fundamentally a systemic disease, not one that simply spreads from an initial site.

    "Many women who could have undergone more narrow surgery have chosen mastectomies on the theory that you get it out, and you're not going to have any trouble," stated Dr. Bernard Fisher, who led

    the Pittsburgh study.

    The Dangers of Over-Screening for Cancer

    A new analysis published this month in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) found that screening for both breast and prostate cancer both have a problem that runs counter to everything people have been told about cancer: The screenings are resulting in finding cancers that do not need to be found because they would never spread and kill or even be noticed if left alone. That has in turn led to a huge increase in cancer diagnoses of innocuous cancers would have otherwise gone undetected.

    At the same time, the analysis, "Rethinking Screening for Breast Cancer and Prostate Cancer" also

    found that both screening tests are not making much of a dent in the number of cancers that actually are of a deadly variety. That could be because many lethal breast cancers spread rapidly and gain a foothold between mammograms. The deadly prostate cancers, on the other hand, have often already spread at the time of cancer screening. The dilemma for breast and prostate screening is that it is not usually clear which tumors need aggressive treatment. Many believe that a major reason that is not clear is because studying it has not been much of a priority.

    "The issue here is, as we look at cancer medicine over the last 35 or 40 years, we have always worked to treat cancer or to find cancer early," Dr. Barnett Kramer, associate director for disease prevention at the National Institutes of Health, said. "And we never sat back and actually thought, 'Are we treating the cancers that need to be treated?' "

    Finding insignificant cancers is the reason the breast and prostate cancer rates soared when screening was introduced, Dr. Kramer said. And those cancers, he said, are the reason screening has the problem called overdiagnosis - labeling innocuous tumors cancer and treating them as though they could be lethal when in fact they are not dangerous.

    "Overdiagnosis is pure, unadulterated harm," he said.

    Dr. Peter Albertsen, chief and program director of the urology division at the University of Connecticut Health Center, said that had not been an easy message to get across. "Politically, it's almost unacceptable," Dr. Albertsen said. "If you question overdiagnosis in breast cancer, you are against women. If you question overdiagnosis in prostate cancer, you are against men."

    The Role of Government Institutions

    In the National Cancer Act of 1971, the National Cancer Institute NCI was given the authority to

    prepare and submit an annual budget proposal directly to the President for review and transmittal to Congress. This authority is unique to NCI and allows it to “bypass” the traditional approvals that all other NIH Institutes and Centers must get for their budget requests. As noted above, the NCI was one of the first agencies to sign onboard with the Breast Cancer Awareness movement and its actions are greatly controlled and influenced by the American Cancer Society.

    Other Federal Government agencies, including other NIH Institutes and Centers, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and the Department of Defense, fund cancer research. In addition, state and local governments, voluntary organizations, private institutions, and industry also spend substantial amounts of money on cancer-related research.

    For a list of some of the federal agencies involved in cancer research and funding, see;

    http://www.aacr.org/home/public--media/science-policy--government-affairs/advocacy-tools/federal-agencies.aspx

    A 2004 press release from the Cancer Prevention Coalition detailed how President Nixon appointed a

    three-member NCI executive Cancer Panel following passage of the 1971 National Cancer Act, inaugurating the War Against Cancer, Benno Schmidt, its first Chairman, was a senior drug company

    executive, with close ties to chemical, oil, and steel industries. He was followed in the 1980's by Armand Hammer, the late oil magnate, and Chairman of Occidental Petroleum, a major manufacturer of industrial chemicals, involved in the Love Canal disaster.

    Not surprisingly, Schmidt and Hammer ignored cancer prevention and the major role of industrial

    carcinogens, focusing instead on the highly profitable development and marketing of cancer drugs.


    This fox guarding the chicken coop relationship was mirrored in the MSK's Board of Overseers, most of whom were chief executives of drug, petrochemical, and steel industries. In a 1998 Washington Post interview this relationship was admitted by Samuel Broder, former NCI Director, when he stated that "The NCI has become what amounts to a government pharmaceutical company."

    Despite the escalating incidence over the last three decades of childhood cancers and adult

    cancers unrelated to smoking, and despite substantial evidence relating these cancers to avoidable

    exposures to industrial carcinogens, NCI's conflicts of interest have remained unchanged.

    Misplaced Research into the Causes of Cancer

    The incidence of breast cancer has been increasing about 1 percent a year since 1940. In the 1940’s, a woman’s chance of developing breast cancer in her lifetime was 1 in 22. Today that number is 1 in 8, a risk that has increased over 40% since 1973. In the intervening years since 1973, more American women have died from breast cancer than all Americans killed in World Wars I and II, the Korean War, and Vietnam. Breast cancer has both lifestyle and environmental causes.


    In particular, toxins accumulate in breast tissues, but research into the environmental links has received little funding or attention by corporate and governmental entities.

    Hormones have been at the center of breast cancer research for decades. In the mid-1990’s researchers began to consider the possibility that chlorinated chemicals might contribute to the rising occurrences of breast cancer and researchers Devra Lee Davis and Leon Bradlow hypothesized that environmental and pharmaceutical estrogens were likely culprits. Seen as a threat by chemical interests, the Chemical Manufacturers Association and the Chlorine Chemistry Council banded together to develop a strategy to discount Davis and Bradlow’s hypothesis, including hiring a public relations firm to discredit Davis personally.

    This must have seemed like déjà vu to Davis, who had performed extensive research into the cozy role between industry and the War on Cancer, especially the 4 decades long effort of the tobacco industry to cover up their role in the increase in lung cancer. Davis later published the results of her research in the acclaimed book “The Secret History of the War on Cancer”.

    In 2002, Dr. Ana Soto, a scientist at the Tuft’s School of Medicine, testified that the swift increase in breast cancer could not be attributed to mere genetics, which had long been believed to be the major factor in whether women developed breast cancer. Soto - who has researched cell proliferation and breast cancer for more than 2 decades -- was one of several experts to testify at an informational hearing on breast cancer and the environment, jointly sponsored by the Senate Health and Human Services Committee and Assembly Health Committee in California.

    "While many breast cancer studies focus on genetics, or lifestyle factors such as reproductive history, alcohol use and exercise, Soto said there was little being done to assess how environmental toxins may be causing cancer," reported ABC News.

    According to the Tufts professor of cell, molecular, and developmental biology, there is already some evidence to suggest a link:

    "The increasing risk of breast cancer and other cancers has paralleled the proliferation of synthetic chemicals since World War II," said Soto. The Tufts professor added that only 7 percent

    of the estimated 85,000 chemicals registered for use in the United States have been reviewed for

    toxicity.

    “State of the Evidence 2008: The Connection Between Breast Cancer and the Environment”, which was

    edited by Janet Gray, Ph.D., was published by the Breast Cancer Fund, an organization which appears to have less industry influence than most others.   The comprehensive report detailed the environmental exposures linked to increased breast cancer risk, including natural and synthetic estrogens; xenoestrogens and other endocrine-disrupting compounds; carcinogenic chemicals and radiation. Among the environmental factors identified that combined with genes and lifestyle factors were air pollution, consumer exposures to carcinogens, occupational exposures, pesticides and radiation.

    The Lack of Progress behind the Pink Curtain

    There has been a great deal of glad handing and back slapping in recent years over what has been

    announced as a slight downward trend in the occurrence of breast cancer as well as annual breast cancer deaths, though black women, whose cancer rates and deaths continue to climb, likely find

    little solace in the announced trend. When one peals back the veil of so-called progress, little credit can be given to the increased screenings and mammograms touted by so many of the breast cancer organizations. Instead, most of the credit is likely due to decreased use of Hormone Replacement Therapy (HRT).

    Further, when one subtracts the figures for DCIS, the much touted successes against breast cancer take on a complete different picture. DCIS, which stands Ductal Carcinoma in Situ, is viewed as a stage 0 cancer, and has a cure rate of almost 100%. At one time, DCIS was considered a pre-cancerous condition and was not included in cancer survival statistics.

    Today, when we see 5 year survival figures of 96% quoted for localized breast cancers, those figures actually fall precipitously when the 60,000 annual DCIS diagnoses are removed. A truer look at cancer survival rates would be the 77% five year survival for women whose cancer has spread locally and the dismal 5-10% five year survival rates for those whose cancers have metastasized beyond the original region.

    Source: http://www.pdrhealth.com/disease/disease-mono.aspx? contentFileName=BHG01ON01.xml&contentName=Breast+Cancer&contentId=17

    Though often equated as “cures”, survival of five years does not indicate that anyone has beaten cancer and will live a cancer free normal lifespan. In fact, those who survive for five years frequently still have cancer and most of those who are cancer free can expect a return of cancer at some point in time. The average survival time beyond five years is a mere 26 months.

    Regardless of the figures quoted, breast cancer remains the number one cancer killer for Hispanic women and the number two cancer killer for Black and Anglo women.

    Misdirected Research into Cancer Prevention and Cures

    About the author

    Tony Isaacs is a natural health advocate and researcher and the author of books and articles about

    natural health including Cancer's Natural Enemy. Mr. Isaacs articles are featured at Natural News, the Health Science Institute's Healthiertalk website, CureZone, the Crusador online, AlignLife, the Cancer Tutor, the American Chronicle and several other venues. Mr. Isaacs also has The Best Years in Life website for baby boomers and others wishing to avoid prescription drugs and mainstream managed illness and live longer, healthier and happier lives naturally. In addition, he hosts the Yahoo Oleandersoup Health group of over 2600 members and the CureZone Ask Tony Isaacs - Featuring Luella May forum. You can listen to Mr. Isaacs and his partner Luella May and special guests every Wednesday evening on The Best Years in Life Radio Show broadcast by Wolf Spirit

    clifylq

    http://clifylq.blogspot.com/
    http://clifylq.livejournal.com/
    http://cliffs3-daywalk.com/index.html
    http://ravediet.com/?PARTNER=RDLCL
    http://supportbordercontrols.blogspot.com/
    http://www.lindquistinvestigationservices.com/

    http://www.whale.to/a/mammography_h.html


    YES LADIES THE MAMMOGRAMS YOU USE ONCE A YEAR TO CHECK FOR BREAST CANCER IS KNOWN TO ACTUALLY CAUSE THE CANCER YOU WANT TO CHECK FOR. BUT THE SICK TRUTH IS THAT THE DOCTORS PRESCRIBING IT KNOWS THIS BUT STILL BURNS YOUR BREAST WITH CANCER CAUSING RADIATION WHEN THEY COULD USE THERMOGRAM CHECKS REPLETE OF RADIATION. INSTEAD IT USES DIGITAL INFRARED. DID YOU KNOW THIS FACT? HOW MANY MAMMOGRAMS HAVE YOU HAD THUS FAR LADIES? DOES THIS PISS YOU OFF?? GO TO MY WEB SITE TO DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT HERE: http://cliffs3-daywalk.com/



    Current Mood: MAD
    Friday, March 1st, 2013
    8:19 am
    WOMEN BEWARE-MAMMOGRAPHY TESTING & PINK RIBBON CURE FOR CANCER FRAUDS KOMEN/AVON ETC.!

    http://kojoreport.com/women-beware-mammography-testing-pink-ribbon-cure-for-cancer-fraud/

    WOMEN BEWARE-MAMMOGRAPHY TESTING & PINK RIBBON CURE FOR CANCER FRAUDS!

    August 6, 2012
    By Lilly O'Brien -

    All across America, men and women participate in “run for the cure” events, raising tens of  millions of dollars each year that go into the hands of Komen for the Cure. What these people  don’t know is that much of that money is spent on “free” mammograms. Those mammograms, in turn,  actually cause breast cancer because they subject women to high doses of ionizing radiation.  (naturalnews.com)

    Monday, August 06, 2012 by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger Naturalnews.com reports:
    Women’s Mammography Testing & Cure for Cancer Pink Ribbon a Fraud!

    The Susan G. Komen scam, in essence, is to raise money that’s used to give women cancer and create  a financial windfall for the very same companies that financially support Komen in the first  place. “The Komen Foundation owns stock in General Electric, one of the largest makers of  mammogram machines in the world. It also owns stock in several pharmaceutical companies, including AstraZeneca,” reports Tony Isaacs at NaturalNews

    “DuPont, another huge chemical company and major polluter, supplies much of the film used in  mammography machines. Both DuPont and GE aggressively promote mammography screening of women in their 40s, despite the risk of its contributing to breast cancer in that age group. And while  biotech giant Monsanto sponsors Breast Cancer Awareness Month‘s high profile event, the Race for  the Cure, it continues to profit from the production of many known carcinogens.”  (http://www.tbyil.com/breast-cancer-deception.htm)

    The bottom line? Komen deceives women while powerful corporations rake in the profits. This isn’t  merely my own opinion. Two prominent doctors, in an article published in the British Medical  Journal, have sharply condemned Komen for the Cure for lying about the “benefits” of mammograms.

    Their names? Steven Woloshin and Lisa Schwartz, directors of the Center for Medicine and the Media at Dartmouth Medical School in Hanover, New Hampshire.They join a growing number of other doctors  and medical professionals who now see Komen for the Cure as afundraising fraudand are going public with detailed accusations against Komen’s deceptions.In the recently published BMJ article,  Woloshin and Schwartz accused Komen of lying in its promotional propaganda for the 2011 Breast  Cancer Awareness Month. In advertising, Komen falsely claimed the 5-year survival rate when breast cancer is caught early is 98%, while only 23% when not “caught early.” This is how Komen tricks women into getting more mammograms which cause more cancer — by claiming “early detection saves lives.” But it’s not science; it’s pure propaganda.

    According to study authors Woloshin and Schwartz, Komen willfully ignored “a growing and increasingly accepted body of evidence [showing] that although screening may reduce a woman’s chance of dying from breast cancer by a small amount, it also causes major harms.”
     Here’s an image published by the British Medical Journal, detailing how Komen for the Cure is lying about mammography: http://www.naturalnews.com/gallery/articles/Komen_Deception_BMJ.jpg

    How mammograms kill women

    Woloshin and Schwartz explain that anywhere from 20% to 50% of women who receive mammograms for a decade of their lives will have at least one “false alarm.”These false alarms often lead to women  being treated with deadly chemotherapy cocktails. These expensive drugs enrich the very same drug  companies that donate money to Komen for the Cure. This is all part of the cycle of fraudthat  exploits women’s bodies for profit, all while conducting this sick fraud with the message of “finding a cure,” emblazoned with pink ribbons. The magnitude of the deception in all this is pathological… even criminal.

    That harm often comes in the form of unnecessary chemotherapy that poisons womenbut financially  benefits the drug companies. Here’s another article on NaturalNews which also supports this  conclusion:

    Learn more:

    http://www.naturalnews.com/036711_Komen_for_the_Cure_mammography_fraud.html#ixzz22mpGZyX2

    Corporate Partners

    Komen’s corporate partners include General Mills, Zumba Fitness, Walgreens, The Republic of Tea,  REMAX, New Balance, American Airlines, Bank of America, Ford Motor Company, Dell and many more Susan G. Komen for the Cure is dedicated to setting new standards for creative collaboration in  the fight against breast cancer.

    Our corporate partners provide us with the opportunity to reach people where they live, work, and  play. In addition to a financial contribution, each of these organizations have found a unique way to get their customers and employees involved in raising young awareness and hope that we will one-day find the cures. We thank them for their commitment to the fight to end breast cancer.  There are 125 plus partners you are familar with the brands that use the cure for cancer PINK  RIBBON to make you support their FRAUD.  Click Here to check out the 125 partners brand names.http://ww5.komen.org/corporatepartners.aspx

    Obscene executive salaries

    “Susan G. Komen for the Cure is a multimillion-dollar company with assets totaling over $390 million . Only 20.9% of these funds were reportedly used in the 2009-2010 fiscal year for research “for the cure,”writes Emily Michele at Alternet (http://www.alternet.org/story/154010/i_will_not_be_pinkwashed%3A_kome…)

    She goes on to explain, “I don’t know about you, but I would never expect directors of a charitable “non-profit” organization to make more than most doctors, lawyers, or even politicians.  Their CEO and president, Hala G. Moddelmog, made $531,924, plus $26,683 in change. That’s more  than President Obama makes.”

    Komen spends about 39% of its money on “public health education,” which is just another way to say  “pinkwashing.” This money is used to catapult the Komen propaganda so that future fundraising events can raise even more money, much of which is paid to Komen’s fat cat executives as cushy salaries.

    Just remember: When you run for the cure, a significant portion of the money you raise is going straight into the pockets of wealthy Komen executives. None of the money is actually being used to promote vitamin D or cancer prevention. “Detection,” after all, is not prevention. It’s just a way to push the cancer industry’s agenda of treating more women with toxic chemotherapy chemicals (and more ionizing radiation).

    Learn more:

    http://www.naturalnews.com/036711_Komen_for_the_Cure_mammography_fraud.html#ixzz22mrDRBI

    Are you going to support PINK RIBBON PRODUCTS and take the MAMMOGRAPHY?

    Exposed: 10 Facts about the Breast Cancer Industry You’re Not Supposed to Know

    Myth #2: Pink ribbon products are sold to raise money to support breast cancer victims.

    The Truth: Nearly 100% of the funds are used to recruit more breast cancer patients into highly-lucrative treatments that do more harm than good.

    You know where all that money goes that you donate to the “search for the cure” and other cancer  scams? Virtually none of it goes to actually teach women how to prevent cancer. The World Health  Organization says 70% of all cancers are preventable, but the breast cancer industry helps zero percent of women actually prevent it.

    Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/024536_cancer_women_breast.html#ixzz22mt5Ojsh

    Myth #5: Regular mammograms are the best way to detect cancer

    The Truth: Mammograms harm 10 women for every one woman they help

    Myth #7: The cancer non-profits are searching for a cure for cancer

    The Truth: Even if one was found, they would never allow a cure to be publicized: It would destroy the cancer treatment industry. It’s the great scam of the cancer industry: We’re searching for a cure, they claim! Never mind the fact that they’ve been using this same con since the late 60′s, when they claimed to be only a few million dollars away from curing cancer forever.
    Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/024536_cancer_women_breast.html#ixzz22ms5esX

    Are these results because we are taking the mammography? Graph shows North America, Europe, and  Australia that force you to take the mammography have the largest numbers of cancer….Figure that one out.   Do your research. http://kojoreport.com/women-beware-mammography-testing-pink-ribbon- cure-for-cancer-fraud/

     - See more at:

    http://kojoreport.com/women-beware-mammography-testing-pink-ribbon-cure-for- cancer-fraud/#sthash.O6co6oir.dpuf

    clifylq

    RECOMMENDED LINKS:

    http://clifylq.blogspot.com/
    http://clifylq.livejournal.com/
    http://cliffs3-daywalk.com/index.html
    http://supportbordercontrols.blogspot.com/

    http://www.lindquistinvestigationservices.com/


    http://clifylq.livejournal.com/125646.html

    YES LADIES THE MAMMOGRAMS YOU USE ONCE A YEAR TO CHECK FOR BREAST CANCER IS KNOWN TO ACTUALLY CAUSE THE CANCER YOU WANT TO CHECK FOR. BUT THE SICK TRUTH IS THAT THE DOCTORS PRESCRIBING IT KNOWS THIS BUT STILL BURNS YOUR BREAST WITH CANCER CAUSING RADIATION WHEN THEY COULD USE THERMOGRAM CHECKS REPLETE OF RADIATION. INSTEAD IT USES DIGITAL INFRARED. DID YOU KNOW THIS FACT? HOW MANY MAMMOGRAMS HAVE YOU HAD THUS FAR LADIES? DOES THIS PISS YOU OFF?? GO TO MY WEB SITE TO DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT HERE: http://cliffs3-daywalk.com/



    Current Mood: Angry
    Tuesday, February 26th, 2013
    8:36 am
    OBAMA ELECTS FORMER VP OF MONSANTO RULE OVER FDA AS COMMISSIONER TO DESTROY AMERICA'S FOOD SUPPLY

    http://topdocumentaryfilms.com/the-world-according-to-monsanto/


    Who controls the food supply controls the people; who controls the energy can control whole continents; who controls money can control the world.-- Henry Kissinger

    THE WORLD ACCORDING TO MONSANTO

    Environment 244 Comments There’s nothing they are leaving untouched: the mustard, the okra, the bringe oil, the rice, the cauliflower. Once they have established the norm: that seed can be owned as their property, royalties can be collected. We will depend on them for every seed we grow of every crop we grow. If they control seed, they control food, they know it – it’s strategic. It’s more powerful than bombs. It’s more powerful than guns. This is the best way to control the populations of the world. The story starts in the White House, where Monsanto often got its way by exerting disproportionate influence over policymakers via the “revolving door”. One example is Michael Taylor, who worked for Monsanto as an attorney before being appointed as deputy commissioner of the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 1991. While at the FDA, the authority that deals with all US food approvals, Taylor made crucial decisions that led to the approval of GE foods and crops. Then he returned to Monsanto, becoming the company’s vice president for public policy.

    Thanks to these intimate links between Monsanto and government agencies, the US adopted GE foods and crops without proper testing, without consumer labeling and in spite of serious questions hanging over their safety. Not coincidentally, Monsanto supplies 90 percent of the GE seeds used by the US market. Monsanto’s long arm stretched so far that, in the early nineties, the US Food and Drugs Agency even ignored warnings of their own scientists, who were cautioning that GE crops could cause negative health effects. Other tactics the company uses to stifle concerns about their products include misleading advertising, bribery and concealing scientific evidence.

    THE EVIL OF MONSANTO AND GMOS: BAD TECHNOLOGY, ENDLESS GREED & DESTRUCTION OF HUMANITY

    Natural News
    September 23, 2012

    (NaturalNews) By now, nearly all informed people recognize that Monsanto is widely regarded as the most evil corporation on our planet. But what, exactly, makes Monsanto so evil? Why is Monsanto worse than a pharmaceutical company, a pesticide company or even a weapons manufacturer?

    The answer to this question is found in probing the virtue of the corporation in question. As virtuous people, we expect corporations to act with a sense of fundamental human decency. We expect them to behave within the boundaries of respecting human life, honest business practices and reliable science. We (naively) wish that corporations would act like decent human beings.

    But they don’t. In their quest for profit at any cost, they violate the basic tenants of virtue. They betray humanity. They destroy life. They malign Mother Nature herself, and in doing so, they threaten the very future of sustainable life on our planet.

    Here, I unravel the fundamental “violations of virtue” that Monsanto practices on a daily basis. It is these things, I think you’ll agree, that make Monsanto a despicable corporate entity and a threat to all humankind.

    Corporate greed over service to humanity

    Monsanto’s actions are designed to maximize its corporate profits, not to serve the people. Its entire seed-and-herbicide business model is designed to trap farmers in a system of economic dependence… to turn farmers into indentured servants who can never return to traditional farming after their soil has been destroyed with Roundup.

    Death over life

    Monsanto’s products cause death. They compromise and violate life. Monsanto’s GM corn grown a toxic chemical right inside each and every corn kernel. This corn is what is subsequently eaten by humans.

    Rats fed this corn grew horrifying cancer tumors as shown here:

    In a recent scientific study, a shocking 70 percent of female rats died prematurely when fed GMOs. Fifty percent of males died early. Almost all of them died from cancer tumors.

    Read more about the link between GMOs and cancer tumors at:
    http://www.naturalnews.com/037249_GMO_study_cancer_tumors_organ_damage.html

    Secrecy over transparency

    Monsanto is spending millions of dollars to try to defeat Proposition 37 in California — a bill which would simply require GMOs to be indicated on food labels.

    But Monsanto and other companies such as those that own Larabar, Silk and Kashi do not want consumers to know the truth about GMOs in the foods they buy. (See the GMO boycott infographic here.) They’re also spending huge sums of money to try to defeat Proposition 37 so that the food companies can keep GMOs a dirty little secret about the poison in your food.

    Plainly stated, these companies do not want you to know what you’re eating. And why? Because you’re eating poison!

    Domination of technology rather than sharing of wisdom

    Monsanto does not create technology and then share wisdom with farmers; instead the company patents its GE seeds and thereby claims monopolistic ownership over them. This patent is used to punish farmers!

    When Monsanto’s GMO seeds blow into the fields of farmers who are trying to avoid growing GMOs, Monsanto uses its patent “rights” to sue the farmers and claim they “stole” Monsanto property!

    This is an example of the kind of pure evil Monsanto engages in on a regular basis. From the top company executives to the bottom of the corporate ladder, people who work for Monsanto are engaged in promoting a sickening, unprecedented evil that’s spreading across our planet like a black slimy cancer tumor.

    That’s no coincidence, either, considering that eating GMOs causes massive cancer tumors.

    Artificial manipulation of nature rather than honoring of nature

    Instead of working with the beauty, the genius and the abundance that has already been engineered into nature, Monsanto seeks to violate nature, overriding healthy plant genes with poison genes that generate insecticides right inside the crops.

    Instead of honoring the natural ability of seeds to reproduce generation after generation, Monsanto develops “terminator seed” technology that causes seeds to self-terminate after one generation. This, by itself, is a heinous crime against nature, humankind and planet Earth. It is a crime worse than the Nazi holocaust, for terminator seeds threaten ALL human life on our planet… billions of lives are threatened by the behavior of Monsanto.

    Environmental destruction over environmental stewardship

    Roundup herbicide devastates soils, rendering them contaminated and unable to produce healthy crops using traditional (or organic) farming methods. Once a farm plot is destroyed with Roundup, that farmer is forever enslaved to a chemical-based farming protocol. It’s unhealthy, it’s a disaster to the environment, and the actual crop yields are LOWER than with organic farming, over a period of five years or more.

    By encouraging farmers to spray literally millions of acres of farmland with Roundup, Monsanto is engaged in a conspiracy to destroy our agricultural heritage and turn us all into “food slaves” that must pay tribute to Monsatan.

    Scientific deception over scientific truth

    The so-called “science” coming out of Monsanto is some of the most inane, malicious and brutally deceptive junk science ever fabricated by corporate science sellouts. Instead of testing GMOs for long durations on animals, Monsanto-funded scientists test GMOs for a mere 90 days and then adamantly declare the food to be “safe” for a lifetime of consumption by humans.

    It’s no wonder they didn’t run long-term tests: The real acceleration in cancer tumors only emerged after the 90-day milestone in rats.

    Even if Monsanto-funded scientists found GMOs to be safe in a “lifetime” feeding study, you couldn’t trust those results anyway: Any scientist, politician or media group with financial ties to Monsanto must now be assumed to be compromised and lacking any credibility whatsoever. Monsanto has bought off countless scientists, experts, media writers and politicians. But paying them off doesn’t alter reality. Poison in the corn is still poison in the corn, even if you pay a group of sellout scientists to foolishly declare otherwise.

    The CHANGE we really need: Corporations with virtue

    Something is terribly, terribly wrong with corporate behavior in America, and Monsanto is just one of thousands of corporations which demonstrate highly irresponsible, extreme, destructive behavior.

    The very design of corporations is missing something: HUMANITY. Sure, corporations are great at generating profits, streamlining logistics, manufacturing, marketing and so on. But where’s the humanity in all that?

    It’s nowhere to be found. Corporations don’t care WHO they harm, WHAT they destroy, HOW they behavior or even HOW FAR they have to go to make another buck.

    Here at NaturalNews.com, we’ve documented corporations engaging in the most despicable, anti-human behavior imaginable, including using little children as vaccine guinea pigs, secretly testing diseases on prisoners, routinely falsifying evidence, bribing physicians, lying to regulators, engaging in efforts to deny consumers access to more affordable products, inventing fictitious diseases (“disease mongering”) to market toxic drugs, and even hiring P.R. firms to spread lies and disinformation online through social networks and websites.

    And that’s just the pharmaceutical industry. Think about the evils perpetrated by the agricultural giants, weapons manufacturers and globalist banks. There is no end to their destruction.

    A corporation is like a cancer tumor. It wants to tap into more and more resources, growing larger and larger until it kills everything. That’s the innate drive of nearly every large corporation you’ve ever heard of: Get big, destroy the competition and DOMINATE! Even if it means killing our future.

    When corporations become so powerful that they practically run the government — as they do now — the correct descriptive term for that arrangement is Fascism.

    How do you stop Fascism? With a revolution, of course. And a peaceful one would be far preferable.

    The revolution we need is a revolution against the corporation

    As we see our present-day society being utterly destroyed by corporations — banking, agriculture, pharmaceutical, etc. — we must get serious about what needs to happen to change the structure of corporations so that they serve humanity rather than destroying humanity.

    Here are some suggestions worth considering:

    #1) Strip away corporate personhood protections.

    #2) Deny all patents on seeds, genes and medicines. Such things should belong to everyone, not to a monopolistic few. This would also take the profit out of medicine, meaning drug companies would no longer have a financial incentive to fabricate and promote fictitious diseases.

    #3) Ban all corporate lobbying and campaign contributions. No corporation should have access to lawmakers, period. Lawmakers should serve the people who elected them and no one else.

    #4) Disband all corporations that currently function as a danger to humanity. This would include, of course, Monsanto, Merck and many others. Who decides this? Whoever wins the revolution, of course. (Isn’t that always the case?)

    #5) Nationalize the Federal Reserve and make it “America’s bank” so that Fed money is owned by the People and benefits the People instead of globalist banks.

    #6) Halt the “revolving door” where government regulators take high-paying jobs at the very corporations they’ve been regulating. Once a person works in an influential position for a government regulator, they should be forever restricted from working for the industry they once regulated.

    #7) End “Free Speech rights” for corporations. Corporations are not people. They have no God-given rights. By ending this fabricated “right,” we could institute strict advertising limits that would prevent corporations from advertising harmful products to children and adults.

    Stop supporting evil

    The ultimate solution, of course, is a consumer solution: Stop purchasing products from evil corporations! This means you need to stop buying non-organic corn products such as breakfast cereals, corn tortillas, and corn snack chips.

    Stop buying lawn pesticide chemicals. Stop buying medications. Stop buying toxic perfumes, cosmetics and personal care products. Stop buying soda pop and aspartame!

    YOU help shift the world in a more positive direction by shifting your own personal purchasing habits. And that’s something you can control right now, today, starting with the very next dollar you spend at the store.

    BUY ORGANIC, non-GMO products wherever possible. You’ll be changing the world one purchase at a time. That’s a genuine, practical way to diminish the power of evil corporations starting right now. http://www.naturalnews.com/037289_Monsanto_corporations_ethics.html

    Realization #6) Governments are literally trying to kill their own people. It is widely known in the inner circles of power that GMOs are deadly, but governments keep pushing them anyway. As Jeffrey Smith explains in his interview with Democracy Now:

    "...the person who was in charge of FDA policy in 1992, Monsanto’s former attorney, Michael Taylor, he allowed GMOs on the market without any safety studies and without labeling, and the policy claimed that the agency was not aware of any information showing that GMOs were significantly different. Seven years later, because of a lawsuit, 44,000 secret internal FDA memos revealed that that policy was a lie. Not only were the scientists at the FDA aware that GMOs were different, they had warned repeatedly that they might create allergies, toxins, new diseases and nutritional problems. But they were ignored, and their warnings were even denied, and the policy went forth allowing the deployment GMOs into the food supply with virtually no safety studies." http://www.naturalnews.com/030828_GMOs_Wikileaks.html

    MONSANTO'S HARVEST OF FEAR

    Monsanto already dominates America’s food chain with its genetically modified seeds. Now it has targeted milk production. Just as frightening as the corporation’s tactics–ruthless legal battles against small farmers–is its decades-long history of toxic contamination.

    by Donald L. Barlett and James B. Steele

    The Control of Nature

    For centuries—millennia—farmers have saved seeds from season to season: they planted in the spring, harvested in the fall, then reclaimed and cleaned the seeds over the winter for re-planting the next spring. Monsanto has turned this ancient practice on its head.

    Monsanto developed G.M. seeds that would resist its own herbicide, Roundup, offering farmers a convenient way to spray fields with weed killer without affecting crops. Monsanto then patented the seeds. For nearly all of its history the United States Patent and Trademark Office had refused to grant patents on seeds, viewing them as life-forms with too many variables to be patented. “It’s not like describing a widget,” says Joseph Mendelson III, the legal director of the Center for Food Safety, which has tracked Monsanto’s activities in rural America for years.

    Indeed not. But in 1980 the U.S. Supreme Court, in a five-to-four decision, turned seeds into widgets, laying the groundwork for a handful of corporations to begin taking control of the world’s food supply. In its decision, the court extended patent law to cover “a live human-made microorganism.” In this case, the organism wasn’t even a seed. Rather, it was a Pseudomonas bacterium developed by a General Electric scientist to clean up oil spills. But the precedent was set, and Monsanto took advantage of it. Since the 1980s, Monsanto has become the world leader in genetic modification of seeds and has won 674 biotechnology patents, more than any other company, according to U.S. Department of Agriculture data.

    Farmers who buy Monsanto’s patented Roundup Ready seeds are required to sign an agreement promising not to save the seed produced after each harvest for re-planting, or to sell the seed to other farmers. This means that farmers must buy new seed every year. Those increased sales, coupled with ballooning sales of its Roundup weed killer, have been a bonanza for Monsanto. http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/features/2008/05/monsanto200805?currentPage=1

    AGENT ORANGE DEFOLIANT USED IN VIET NAM

    Agent Orange, made by the Monsanto Corporation and Dow Chemical, was one of the herbicides and defoliants used by the U.S. military as part of its herbicidal warfare program during the Vietnam War from 1961 to 1971. Dioxin, the toxic compound in Agent Orange, has been shown to cause cancer, birth defects and organ dysfunction.

    Vietnam estimates 400,000 people were killed or maimed, and 500,000 children born with birth defects as a result of its use. The Red Cross of Vietnam estimates that up to 1 million people are disabled or have health problems due to Agent Orange. (Source)

    Unfortunately, when you spray toxic chemicals, it’s not something that goes away anytime soon. 40 years later, children in southeast Asia are still being born with birth defects from Agent Orange.

    Children in the areas where Agent Orange was used have been affected and have multiple health problems, including cleft palate, mental disabilities, hernias, and extra fingers and toes. In the 1970s, high levels of dioxin were found in the breast milk of South Vietnamese women, and in the blood of U.S. soldiers who had served in Vietnam. (Source)

    Monsanto’s Agent Orange Still Poisoning Children in Vietnam
    http://www.cheeseslave.com/monsantos-agent-orange-still-poisoning-children-in-vietnam/

    Monsanto is Killing off the World’s Bee Population to Make Way for Their Genetically Modified FrankenBees
    http://supportbordercontrols.blogspot.com/2013/02/zionist-monsanto-is-killing-off.html#links

    *Blamed for Bee Collapse, Monsanto Buys Leading Bee Research Firm
     Read more here: http://naturalsociety.com/monsanto-bee-collapse-buys-bee-research-firm/

    *Monsanto buys leading bee research firm after being implicated in bee colony collapse
     Read more here: http://www.naturalnews.com/035688_Monsanto_honey_bees_colony_collapse.html

    *Monsanto Genetically Engineering Bees
     Read more here: http://dreamingabeautifulworld.blogspot.com/2012/04/monsanto-genetically-engineering-bees.htm
    l

    What Can You do to Help the Honeybees?

    If you want to learn more about bees and CCD, I highly recommend watching the documentary film Vanishing of the Bees. The film recommends four actions you can take to help preserve honeybees everywhere:

     •Support organic farmers and shop at local farmer's markets as often as possible. You can "vote with your fork" three times a day. [When you buy organic, you are making a statement by saying "no" to genetically engineered foods]
    •Cut the use of toxic chemicals in your house and on your lawn, and use organic pest control.
    •Better yet, get rid of your lawn altogether and plant a garden. Lawns offer very little benefit for the environment. Both flower and vegetable gardens provide good honey bee habitats.
    •Become an amateur beekeeper. Having a hive in your garden requires only about an hour of your time per week, benefits your local ecosystem, and you can enjoy your own honey!

    If you are interested in more information about bee preservation, the following organizations are a good place to start.
     •Pesticide Action Network Bee Campaignv
    •The Foundation for the Preservation of Honey Beesvi
    •American Beekeeping Federationvii
    •Help the Honey Beesviii

    Keep Fighting for Labeling of Genetically Engineered Foods

    While California Prop. 37 failed to pass last November, by a very narrow margin, the fight for GMO labeling is far from over. The field-of-play has now moved to the state of Washington, where the people's initiative 522, "The People's Right to Know Genetically Engineered Food Act," will require food sold in retail outlets to be labeled if it contains genetically engineered ingredients. As stated on LabelitWA.org:

    "Calorie and nutritional information were not always required on food labels. But since 1990 it has been required and most consumers use this information every day. Country-of-origin labeling wasn't required until 2002. The trans fat content of foods didn't have to be labeled until 2006.

    Now, all of these labeling requirements are accepted as important for consumers. The Food and Drug

    Administration (FDA) also says we must know with labeling if our orange juice is from fresh oranges or frozen concentrate.

    Doesn't it make sense that genetically engineered foods containing experimental viral, bacterial, insect, plant or animal genes should be labeled, too? Genetically engineered foods do not have to be tested for safety before entering the market. No long-term human feeding studies have been done. The research we have is raising serious questions about the impact to human health and the environment.

    I-522 provides the transparency people deserve. I-522 will not raise costs to consumers or food producers. It simply would add more information to food labels, which manufacturers change routinely anyway, all the time. I-522 does not impose any significant cost on our state. It does not require the state to conduct label surveillance, or to initiate or pursue enforcement. The state may choose to do so, as a policy choice, but I-522 was written to avoid raising costs to the state or consumers."

    Remember, as with CA Prop. 37, they need support of people like YOU to succeed. Prop. 37 failed with a very narrow margin simply because we didn't have the funds to counter the massive ad campaigns created by the No on 37 camp, led by Monsanto and other major food companies. Let's not allow Monsanto and its allies to confuse and mislead the people of Washington and Vermont as they did in California. So please, I urge you to get involved and help in any way you can, regardless of what state you live in.

     •No matter where you live in the United States, please donate money to these labeling efforts through the Organic Consumers Fund.
    •If you live in Washington State, please sign the I-522 petition. You can also volunteer to help gather signatures across the state.
    •For timely updates on issues relating to these and other labeling initiatives, please join the

    Organic Consumers Association on Facebook, or follow them on Twitter.
    •Talk to organic producers and stores and ask them to actively support the Washington initiative.

    clifylq

    http://www.clifylq.com
    http://clifylq.blogspot.com/
    http://clifylq.livejournal.com/
    http://supportbordercontrols.blogspot.com/


    MONSANTO'S ZIONIST BEDFELLOWS

    The Senate rammed through the S-510 Food Safety Bill while Americans were sleeping as a rider to the “Cash for Clunkers” Bill.

    Obeying their corporate master, Monsanto Corporation, Capitol Hill’s new Food Bill has all the earmarks of being written by Monsanto’s former Vice President, Michael Taylor.

    Taylor is now the FDA’s Commissioner for Foods where he is supervising the coming torrent of Monsanto’s genetically modified foods (GMO’s) into the American marketplace.

    Taylor is guided by his overseers, Zionist Jews Dr Margaret Hamburg and Dr Joshua Sharfstein who head the FDA’s governing department, the Office of Commissioners.

    Hamburg, known as a “bioterrorism” expert, contributed to the creation of the Senate Committee for Homeland Security led by her Jewish colleague, Talmudic Jew, Senator Joseph Lieberman.

    And Sharfstein, former adviser to Jewish Senator Henry Waxman, is currently overseeing efforts to prevent labeling of Monsanto’s toxic GMO foods since they are currently recognized by the FDA as “GRAS,” that is, “Generally Recognized As Safe” which means it only kills 50% of the rats!

    Now, the revolving door between public officials such as Michael Taylor of the FDA and Monsanto is alarming.

    For example, a Dr. Michael A. Friedman, a Jew, was a Commissioner of the FDA before he was hired as senior Vice President of Monsanto.

    But there’s a global component to the Food Bill which is part of the Judaic World Order.

    Louis Dreyfus International, a Jewish multi-national agricultural firm, with offices throughout America and across the globe, now exports Monsanto’s GMO seeds into Europe as a prelude to the coming flood of Monsanto’s toxic seeds into the American market place.

    This Zionist global food beast will soon include Lieberman’s Homeland Security with the creation of a global food-safety standard as dictated by the S-510 Food Bill.

    This is in addition to the Food Bill granting Homeland Security the right to police and shut down small farmers if they dare to use heirloom-seeds rather than buying Monsanto’s GMO toxic seeds.

    The authority over “buying and selling” the foods we eat will now be in the hands of Talmudic Jew, Joseph Lieberman and his Zionist global colleagues. And that’s scary.

    Well, I don’t know about you, but I’m going to start growing my own.

    And Monsanto and their Zionist Bedfellows can take their Food Bill and shove it!
    http://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message1304382/pg1



    Current Mood: Angry
    Sunday, February 3rd, 2013
    1:00 pm
    THE WAR GOES ON AGAINST WOMEN ONE EXAMPLE...MAMMOGRAMS CAUSE CANCER THERMOGRAPHY IS SAFE
    THERMOGRAMSVSMAMAGRAMS (2)
    .... http://www.whale.to/a/pink_ribbon.html


    DO MAMMOGRAMS CAUSE BREAST CANCER?

    By Dr. James Howenstine, MD.
    February 28, 2006
    NewsWithViews.com

    Nobel laureate, Dr. John Gofman, believed that 50% of cancer was caused by unnecessary radiation primarily related to diagnostic xray studies. Large population studies in Denmark and Canada have revealed that the death rates from breast cancer in women taking regular mammograms and women who have never had mammograms are identical. This probably can be explained by the observation that when a mammogram is positive for a breast cancer the tumor has been present for up to 8 or 10 years. This long delay before a tumor becomes visible in a mammogram allows ample time for the cancer to have spread by lymphatic and vascular channels.

    An additional problem with mammograms is that approximately 10% of women who do have breast cancer will have normal mammograms. The false sense of security provided by normal mammography in these women obviously delays the diagnosis of breast cancer even more.

    If this information is valid why are women still having mammograms? Mammography simply joins the long list of therapies and procedures where desire for profits and lowering of world population levels have superceded the welfare of our citizens;

    Flouridation Of Water. Flouride is a very toxic byproduct of the manufacturing of aluminum. It does not prevent and may actually increase the incidence of tooth decay.
    Genetically Modified Foods. These dangerous foods have never been studied for safety as they are unnatural and surely cause disease (immune system dysfunction, cancer, allergies etc.). They are not labeled so you are eating them without any ability to protect your health. Wheat - 80% GMO, Corn - 65% GMO, Soy - 80% GMO, etc. Dr. W. Lee Cowden reports that nearly every person with a chronic illness is allergic to soy.[1]

    Massive Vaccination Programs For Children. The escalating rates of autism, autoimmune illnesses and cancer appear to be at least partially related to mandated vaccines which supply immature immune systems with toxic serum and adjuvants (mercury, aluminum, formaldehyde, foreign cell proteins, infectious organisms). Religious beliefs may allow your children to escape the 35 mandatory vaccines. Vaccines represent a lucrative no risk source of profits as Congress has exempted vaccine manufacturers from liability in the event of adverse reactions which are common.
    Deaths Caused By Pharmaceutical Drugs. More than 125,000 persons die annually in the U.S. from adverse reactions to correctly prescribed medicines.

    Chemotherapy For Malignancies. The survival rates for chemotherapy are not improving after many years of use. These drugs are quite toxic and result in death if not stopped at an appropriate time. Effective alternative therapies for cancer have been suppressed or vilified for more than 100 years (Coley’s toxins, Rife’s electronic invention, Koch’s substances, Essiac tea, antineoplaston, etc.)

    Mandatory Phosphorus, Potassium, Nitrogen Fertilizer. Requiring U.S. farmers to use NPP fertilizer guaranteed poor health. The critical nutrient sulfur and trace minerals are lacking in this fertilizer. Lack of trace minerals impairs enzyme function.

    Advocacy Of Dangerous Dietary Programs And Unwillingness To Remove Dangerous Food Substances. Recommended general diets ignore the danger of sugar excess to pacify the sugar cartel. Hospital heart diets often include the very transfats that cause arteriosclerosis. These synthetic transfats have never been exposed for the health menaces they are. Monosodium glutamate, chlorine containing sugar substitutes and Aspartame (Nutrasweet) have been largely ignored by health agencies established to protect public health.

    Codex Alimentaris. This diabolic creation of the pharmaceutical industry will possibly soon convert all vitamins, minerals, aminoacids and nutritional supplements into drugs requiring a physician’s prescription to permit you to pay 10 times more for the ability to continue to take these substances. This is operational in Norway and Germany and all these basic health substances cost 10 times more than in the days prior to Codex.

    Aluminum Is Everywhere In Our Society (water treatment facilities use alum, foil, deodorants, antacids, cooking utensils, baking compounds) There is considerable evidence that aluminum plays a significant role in causing Alzheimer’s Disease along with mercury.

    Mercury Contamination. Dental amalgams, fish, vaccines, fluorescent light bulbs, coal power plants, sewage treatment, hospital waste disposal, crematoriums, plastic casings, batteries, paint, shoe light bulbs and thermostats all provide mercury that can reach human beings. The ADA denies amalgams are a health risk yet a broken thermometer bulb requires a detailed cleansing protocol. Mercury is the only metal that easily vaporizes making inhalation a big problem.

    The Health Benefits Of Soy Foods Have Been Heavily Advertised

    The truth is that the high estrogen content of soy foods is clearly carcinogenic[2] –especially likely to cause breast cancer. Too much estrogen causes excessive growth of tissue and the breast readily responds to this estrogenic stimulation.

    Soy foods cause premature puberty in young girls and delayed sexual maturation in boys .Infant girls fed soy formula have phytoestrogen levels 20 times higher than normal for girls fed breast milk. These girls may proceed to begin menstruation and breast development by age 7. Boys fed soy have delay in onset of normal puberty with a smaller than normal penis and a greater tendency to homosexuality.[3]

    Soybean protein is inexpensive and has spread all over the world. All Western soy foods are currently more than 80% contaminated by genetically modified soy beans and this is almost certainly a bad feature (GMO soybean manufacturers have not released the results of their health studies on these foods as these results could have damaged the market for GMO foods). Unbiased experts are certain these GMO foods will cause cancer, allergies and immune dysfunction as these GMO foods are foreign to the human body. Most soy foods contain isoflavones which are potent estrogens. Soy foods will aggravate our estrogen excess that we receive from petrochemicals, plastics, hormone implatation in animals and cosmetics (xenoestrogens).. Symptoms related to estrogen will thus be worstened in women and males will have greater difficulty warding off impotence and decreased fertility.

    The U.S. food with the fastest increasing incidence of allergic reactions is soybeans. This is very likely due to the body’s inability to metabolize this foreign synthetic GMO soybean protein.

    Tofu is reported to contribute to accelerated[4] brain aging resulting in dementia

    Also it is not a comfort to me to know that we are eating a small amount of Roundup herbicide every time we eat U. S. soybeans as Monsanto’s Roundup tolerant GMO soybeans[5] are widely grown. Previous to this new GMO product, soybeans promptly died when sprayed with Roundup. Eating Roundup herbicide can not be good for human beings.

    Soy milk causes significant elevation in lipoprotein (a) levels. This undesirable effect was discovered at Loma Linda.[6] All soy products particularly the milk damage the thyroid gland and impair the body’s hormone balance.

    Common soy foods contain sufficient oxalate to contribute to the forming of kidney stones. The absorption of minerals is impeded by phytates in soybeans.

    Soybeans must undergo chemical processing before they become edible. This processing includes acid baths, extreme heat, and spray drying. To improve the taste artificial flavorings such as MSG, preservatives, sweeteners, emulsifiers and synthetic nutrients are added. This processing makes soybeans a very artificial food. The best way to avoid soy is to carefully read labels (watch out for textured protein, vegetable protein etc.)

    The Breast Cancer Epidemic Is Steadily Getting Worse.

    Massive campaigns exist to encourage women to have annual mammograms. More breast tissue is thus exposed to dangerous cancer causing radiation each year. This yearly ritual generates false positive and false negative results leading to many worthless operations and considerable anxiety in women incorrectly diagnosed. Needle biopsies are often done to evaluate breast masses. This procedure occasionally spreads small foci of tumor along the needle track potentially increasing the spread of tumor cells. Mammograms have had more than adequate time to prove their worth and they have failed miserably.

    Breast cancer is a huge growth industry (more than 6.6 billion dollars[7] annually). This industry supports radiologists, xray technicians, surgeons, nurses, manufacturers of xray equipment, hospitals etc. and will not be allowed to disappear by curing and preventing breast cancer.

    A few years ago only 12% of U.S. women could expect to develop breast cancer. . Now with more years of mammography, transfats, increased estrogenic environmental contamination and continued consumption of soy products the rate of breast cancer has increased to perhaps one out of every 8 or 9 women. When will women rise up and say we have had enough of the possibly deliberate mis-management of our problem. Women must take charge of their own health and ignore self serving directives to come in for your annual mammogram. What should be done?

    Thermography Can Diagnose Early Breast Cancer

    Digital infrared thermography detects changes in blood flow in response to cold air blown over the breasts. The blood vessels supplying a cancer are generated by the cancer and are thus not controlled by the autonomic nervous system. This means that blood continues to flow to the malignancy when all other parts of the breast are receiving less blood because of the cold air. producing vasoconstriction. The blood flowing to the cancer shows up as a hot spot on the heat detecting screen with increased blood flow at the site of the tumor. A benign condition like a fibrocystic breast mass retains the normal blood supply controlled by the autonomic nervous system so the cold air causes diffuse decreases in blood flow in a uniform fashion. The thermogram enables breast tumors to be diagnosed when they are tiny and just getting started.

    Therapy with immune supporting substances like Del Immune V, organic food, life style changes (exercise, no smoking, drugs or alcohol etc.) multivitamins, minerals and nutrients permit the tumor to resolve and disappear without the necessity for biopsy.

    Subscribe to the NewsWithViews Daily News Alerts!

    Enter Your E-Mail Address:

    Thermography is safe and gives at least a 2 to 3 year earlier diagnosis of breast cancer than can be made with mammograms. Fewer mammograms will lead to less radiation of breast tissue and is likely to slow the steady increase in breast cancer. Put pressure on your health plan to pay for thermograms!!!

    Footnotes:

    1, Cowden, W. Lee personal communication
    2, Douglass, Wlliam Campbell Real Health Breakthroughs pg. 1Vol5 Number 9Februaru 2006
    3, ibid pg 1
    4, J Am Coll Nutr 129:758-767 1999
    5, Health Sciences Institute e-Alert June 24, 2003 page 1-3.
    6, Loma Linda Center for chronic degenarative disease report 2001
    7, Sellman, Sherrill Synthetic hormones put millions of women at risk for cancer and other deadly diseases. Crusader August/September 2005 pg 6.http://www.newswithviews.com/Howenstine/james42.htm

    © 2006 Dr. James Howenstine - All Rights Reserved

    clifylq



    THERMOGRAMSVSMAMAGRAMSSml
    http://www.clifylq.com/


    YES LADIES THE MAMMOGRAMS YOU USE ONCE A YEAR TO CHECK FOR BREAST CANCER IS KNOWN TO ACTUALLY CAUSE THE CANCER YOU WANT TO CHECK FOR. BUT THE SICK TRUTH IS THAT THE DOCTORS PRESCRIBING IT KNOWS THIS BUT STILL BURNS YOUR BREAST WITH CANCER CAUSING RADIATION WHEN THEY COULD USE THERMOGRAM CHECKS REPLETE OF RADIATION. INSTEAD IT USES DIGITAL INFRARED. DID YOU KNOW THIS FACT? HOW MANY MAMMOGRAMS HAVE YOU HAD THUS FAR LADIES? DOES THIS PISS YOU OFF?? GO TO MY WEB SITE TO DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT HERE: http://cliffs3-daywalk.com/

    Current Mood: ANGRY
    Saturday, February 2nd, 2013
    9:46 am
    NEW WORLD ORDER EXTERMINATION PLANS FOR MINORITY WOMEN ESPECIALLY LATINOS AND BLACKS
    MexicanFlagMedicalSkullMed
    ....................http://www.clifylq.com/


    REPORT PROVES PLANNED PARENTHOOD TARGETS BLACKS, HISPANICS

    by Steven Ertelt | Washington, DC | LifeNews.com | 8/29/11 11:23 AM


    A new reported issued by the pro-life group Life Dynamics proves that Planned Parenthood and the abortion industry in the United States target black and Hispanic Americans by placing abortion facilities in communities with high minority populations. http://lifenews.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/LifeDynamicsRacialReport.pdf

    Titled, “Racial Targeting and Population Control,” the new report validates the claims pro-life advocates have made for years — and that Life Dynamics made in its groundbreaking Maafa21 video released two years ago — showing that abortion advocates have purposefully placed abortion centers in urban areas with high percentages of black and Hispanic residents.

    Mark Crutcher and Carole Novielli conducted the research in the 24-page report and they say the location of abortion centers is the modern equivalent of the population control policies against minorities, especially African-Americans, that Planned Parenthood has supported since Margaret Sanger founded it. The researchers say they prepared the new report to respond to the criticism of the claims abortion advocates have made to the racial charges — and to point out a hypocrisy.

    “The initial response to this documentary from people defending these organizations was to claim that they focus their facilities on minority neighborhoods because that is where the need is,” they write. “Almost immediately, however, they saw that this argument was creating a problem for them. Simply put, it is incompatible with one of their other arguments.”

    Abortion advocates have always claimed that their main goal is to reduce unintended pregnancies and, by placing abortion centers and Planned Parenthood clinics in minority communities, abortion backers claimed their focus wasn’t promoting abortions to blacks and Hispanics but to help them reduce the number of unplanned pregnancies by promoting birth control and contraception.

    “If that is true, in light of their concession that they have focused these things on the minority community, the obvious result should be that black women have the lowest pregnancy and abortion rates in the country,” they researchers write. Yet, a new study released by the pro-abortion Guttmacher Institute, a former Planned Parenthood research affiliate, shows birth control and contraception are not reducing abortions and unplanned pregnancies, especially in lower income minority areas. http://www.lifenews.com/2011/08/25/study-birth-control-not-stopping-unplanned-pregnancies-abortions/

    “But to the contrary, in contemporary America, the rate of pregnancy among black women is almost three times as high as it is for white women and, though they make up less than 13% of the female population, black women have about 37% of the abortions,” the researchers write.

    With that statistic in mind, the researchers set forth with the goal of mapping every abortion facility and Planned Parenthood center in the nation against population and racial demographic data sorted by zip code. They wanted to determine not only whether abortion centers were located in zip codes with high black and Hispanic populations but whether the black and Hispanic populations in the zip codes where abortion businesses were located exceeded the total percentage of the population of the particular state as a whole in terms of its minority population.

    “We began by creating a database of the ZIP codes for every Planned Parenthood facility in the United States. This list was generated from Planned Parenthood’s website. We then used United States Census Bureau figures to establish the percentage of black and Hispanic people residing within each of these ZIP codes as well as within each state,” they write. “In reviewing this data, there are several things to keep in mind. The first is that the issue is not whether a ZIP code is predominately black or Hispanic but whether it is disproportionately black or Hispanic.”

    The results were startling.

    In Texas alone, 94 zip codes show either an abortion facility or a Planned parenthood abortion-referral clinic located there and 72 percent of the zip codes have populations that are disproportionately black and/or Hispanic.

    The report also found multiple abortion centers in many super-minority populated areas. The New Jersey zip code 07631 has a black population 286.7% of the state’s overall percentage and a Hispanic population 163.9% of the state, they noted, and it has four abortion or abortion-referral centers. Minnesota zip code 55404 has a black population that is 797.1% of the overall state percentage and a Hispanic population 537.9% of the state and there are three abortion or abortion-referral clinics there.

    The racial targeting is not limited to certain regions of the country. In Connecticut – a state thoroughly dissimilar from Texas in size, culture and geography – there are 21 zip codes where abortion centers or Planned Parenthood abortion-referral clinics are located and 15 of them have disproportionately black and/or Hispanic populations.

    “Again, this pattern is repeated in state after state,” the researchers noted. “We identified 116 ZIP codes with more than one [abortion or abortion-referral facility]. Of those, 84 were disproportionately black and/or Hispanic. What this means is that, when the American family planning industry places multiple facilities in a ZIP code, that ZIP code is more than two-and-a-half times as likely to be disproportionately minority as not.”

    “What we now know – and have documented – is that there is not one state in the union without [abortion] centers located in ZIP codes with higher percentages of blacks and/or Hispanics than the state’s overall percentage. In fact, Hawaii is the only state that does not have facilities located in ZIP codes exceeding 125% of their overall percentage,” they write. “Not only is this racial targeting widespread, it’s scale is often enormous. We found 42 states with family planning facilities in ZIP codes where the black and/or Hispanic populations exceeds 200% of the state’s overall percentage. More telling is that these percentages routinely go far beyond even this level. Numerous states have facilities in ZIP codes that range from 250% to well over 1,000% and it is not uncommon for them to have facilities located in many such ZIP codes.”

    “In the end, this data speaks for itself and does not require a lot of analysis. The numbers make it clear that the African-American and Hispanic communities have been targeted and logic makes it clear that this did not happen coincidentally or unintentionally,” they concluded. http://www.lifenews.com/2011/08/29/report-proves-planned-parenthood-targets-blacks-hispanics/

    PLANNED PARENTHOOD TARGETS MINORITY WOMEN
    79% of Planned Parenthood’s surgical abortion facilities are located within walking distance of African American and/or Hispanic/Latino communities.
    http://www.protectingblacklife.org/pp_targets/index.html



    THE TRUTH ABOUT MAGARET SANGER!

    Planned Parenthood is the largest abortion provider in America. 78% of their clinics are in minority communities. Blacks make up 12% of the population, but 35% of the abortions in America. Are we being targeted? Isn't that genocide? We are the only minority in America that is on the decline in population. If the current trend continues, by 2038 the black vote will be insignificant. Did you know that the founder of Planned Parenthood, Margaret Sanger, was a devout racist who created the Negro Project designed to sterilize unknowing black women and others she deemed as undesirables of society? The founder of Planned Parenthood said, "Colored people are like human weeds and are to be exterminated." Is her vision being fulfilled today? http://www.blackgenocide.org/planned.html

    HOW PLANNED PARENTHOOD DUPED AMERICA

    At a March 1925 international birth control gathering in New York City, a speaker warned of the menace posed by the "black" and "yellow" peril. The man was not a Nazi or Klansman; he was Dr. S. Adolphus Knopf, a member of Margaret Sanger's American Birth Control League (ABCL), which along with other groups eventually became known as Planned Parenthood.

    Sanger's other colleagues included avowed and sophisticated racists. One, Lothrop Stoddard, was a Harvard graduate and the author of The Rising Tide of Color against White Supremacy. Stoddard was something of a Nazi enthusiast who described the eugenic practices of the Third Reich as "scientific" and "humanitarian." And Dr. Harry Laughlin, another Sanger associate and board member for her group, spoke of purifying America's human "breeding stock" and purging America's "bad strains." These "strains" included the "shiftless, ignorant, and worthless class of antisocial whites of the South."

    Not to be outdone by her followers, Margaret Sanger spoke of sterilizing those she designated as "unfit," a plan she said would be the "salvation of American civilization.: And she also spike of those who were "irresponsible and reckless," among whom she included those " whose religious scruples prevent their exercising control over their numbers." She further contended that "there is no doubt in the minds of all thinking people that the procreation of this group should be stopped." That many Americans of African origin constituted a segment of Sanger considered "unfit" cannot be easily refuted.
    http://www.jesusissavior.com/Evils%20in%20America/Abortion%20is%20Murder/truth_about_margaret_sanger.htm



    MARGARET SANGER'S NATION OF MORONS
    http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/Evils%20in%20America/Abortion%20is%20Murder/margaret_sanger.htm

    THE NEGRO PROJECT:

    Margaret Sanger's EUGENICS Plan For Black Americans
    By Tanya L. Green

    "…I have set before you life and death, blessing and cursing’
    therefore choose life, that both you and your descendants may live."
    --Deuteronomy 30:19 (NKJV

    On the crisp, sunny, fall Columbus Day in 1999, organizers of the "Say So" march approached the steps of the U.S. Supreme Court. The marchers, who were predominantly black pastors and lay persons, concluded their three-day protest at the site of two monumental cases: the school desegregation Brown v. Board of Education (1954) and the pro-abortion Roe v. Wade "rights" in t he latter–converged in the declaration of Rev. Johnny M. Hunter, the march’s sponsor and national director of Life, Education and Resource Network (LEARN), the largest black pro-life organization.

    ‘"Civil rights’ doesn’t mean anything without a right to life!" declared Hunter. He and the other marchers were protesting the disproportionately high number of abortions in the black community. The high number is no accident. Many Americans–black and white–are unaware of Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger’s Negro Project. Sanger created this program in 1939, after the organization changed its name from the American Birth Control League (ABCL) to the Birth Control Federation of America (BCFA).

    The aim of the program was to restrict–many believe exterminate–the black population. Under the pretense of "better health" and "family planning," Sanger cleverly implemented her plan. What’s more shocking is Sanger’s beguilement of black America’s créme de la créme–those prominent, well educated and well-to-do–into executing her scheme. Some within the black elite saw birth control as a means to attain economic empowerment, elevate the race and garner the respect of whites.

    The Negro Project has had lasting repercussions in the black community: "We have become victims of genocide by our own hands," cried Hunter at the "Say So" march.


    clifylq


    MexicanFlagMedicalSkullSmller
    http://www.clifylq.com/qa/


    LADIES THERE IS A WAR BEING WAGED AGAINST WOMEN ESPECIALLY MINORITY WOMEN!

    MARCH WITH CLIFYLQ TO PUT A STOP TO IT NOW AND NOT WITH THE ZIO BASTARDS SUCH AS THE SUSAN G. KOMEN TYPE GROUPS WHO ONLY TAKE YOUR MARCH MONEY TO FILL THEIR COFFERS WITH PROFIT AND GIVE THE REST TO PLANNED PARENTHOOD AND TO ABORTION CLINICS THE VERY PLACES THAT CAUSE CANCER! MARCH WITH ME HERE LADIES: http://cliffs3-daywalk.com/ AND LETS STOP THIS EVIL AGAINST THE FEMALES IN THE WORLD WITH ONE VOICE SHOUTING OUT ENOUGH OF YOUR NWO BULLSHIT. STOP ABORTIONS, STOP PLANNED PARENTHOOD AND THOSE WHO RULE OVER US WHO ARE BEHIND THIS EVIL IN OUR OWN GOVERNMENT. YES OBAMA AND OUR ENTIRE EVIL GOVERNMENT ARE BEHIND IT ALL LADIES!!!!

    Current Mood: Angry
    Friday, January 11th, 2013
    2:53 am
    SUSAN G. KOMEN 3-DAY SIGN UP TO SUPPORT MORE BREAST CANCER (OUR CASH COW) FOR YOUR LIFETIME


    ................. www.clifylq.com



    THERE IS A WAR GOING ON AGAINST WOMEN IN AMERICA AND THEY DON'T EVEN KNOW IT


    CLIFYLQ SAYS THAT MARCHING FOR BREAST CANCER TO RAISE MONEY FOR A CURE IS JUST A HUGE WASTE OF TIME. YOUR MARCHES ARE A JOKE TO THE NWO WHO ARE LAUGHING AT YOU ALL THE WAY TO THEIR BANKS.THERE IS NO CURE THROUGH THEM FOR OVER 50 YEARS NOW. "EVERYONE DESERVES A LIFE TIME OF PROFITS" FROM YOUR LOSS. WAKE UP LADIES! SEEK OUT "GOT CLIFYLQ" FOR THE TRUTH.

    EVE SILVER EDUCATES WOMEN ABOUT THE MONEY BEING COLLECTED BY SUSAN G. KOMEN AND GIVEN TO PLANNED PARENTHOOD.

    MONEY THAT EVE HAS BRANDED, "PINK MONEY".
    http://www.abortionbreastcancer.com/abc.html

    Making informed choices is the mission of Karen Malec’s organization. As the president and co-founder of The Coalition on Abortion and Breast Cancer, she speaks out against the funding being given to Planned Parenthood by the Susan G. Komen foundation. Malec says records show during 2007 the Susan G. Komen Foundation gave 700 thousand dollars of funding to Planned Parenthood. Women deserve to know their risks, Malec says, and abortion should be on the list of breast cancer risks.

    All three women ask the question: Why fund a breast cancer organization that is providing services to women which will increase their risk of breast cancer? Eve, Karen, and Dr. Lanfranchi classify breast cancer research money, which is in turn given to fund abortion services, as “pink money”. They urge you to consider where your money is going and how it is impacting generations of women. https://www.facinglife.tv/store/index.asp


    LADIES,


    FIND OUT FROM CLIFYLQ'S 108 PAGE E-BOOK WHAT IT IS I'M SAYING HERE.


    http://www.clifylq.com/contact-me/


    I WILL LIST THE INTRODUCTION SECTION OF SAID BOOK THAT WILL HELP YOU TO SEE WHAT IT IS I AM SAYING THE FACT THAT THERE IS A CURE NOW FOR CANCER OUR OWN GOVERNMENT WANTS TO HIDE FROM YOU. TO PROTECT THEIR CANCER CASH COW OF TRILLIONS OF DOLLARS FOR TREATMENTS AND FOR POPULATION CONTROL ESPECIALLY TOWARDS YOU WOMEN!!


    INTRODUCTION

    I am writing this e-book purposely for the WOMEN in America and the world the fact that cancer is curable without what is called orthodox treatments i.e., cutting, burning, and poisoning the patients under their care. I want to expose the fact that cancer is a billion dollar if not a trillion dollar business that is being protected by our own evil government and specifically the evil Food and Drug Administration known as the FDA. These Zio criminals of the NWO in conjunction with the Medical Mafia and Big Pharma I call Farmagedon, have one thing in mind ladies and it ain’t curing breast cancer. It’s profit!! Cancer is well established in America as a CASH COW for these bastards controlling our government. It is up to every American (and especially every woman) to finally see the evil I have outlined in this e-book,- “The Quacks That Cured Cancer.”

    It’s time to stop marching for the Zionist controlled and operated Susan G Komen groups who simply put your hard earned march money into their affiliate programs such as Planned Parenthood, and Abortion Clinics. I prove on my web site that both these organizations cause cancer vs. cure it!

    Ladies you need to completely review my web site at clifylq.com and finally compare the findings on this e-book to see that what I am saying is the ugly truth. Our Zionist/Rothschild/Rockefeller/Federal Reserve Bank government does not care about breast cancer or aids or any of the other diseases we Americans suffer from. That is as far as a cure is concerned but the politics of cancer is,- “There is no money or profit in any cure, but trillions for the treatments.”

    I hope to literally PISS each and every woman in this country off to the point of UPROAR and ANGER to stop those who are stopping the cure for cancer from being exposed to us all. Review this e-book to see how other men and women who have already come up with the cure for cancer have been bullied, arrested and shut down from helping any of you ladies suffering from breast cancer. Tell me what’s wrong with this picture ladies?? But more importantly, what are you going to do about it now that you know? Will you simply go back to your sick relative and watch them be eaten up with cancer and killed by chemo and given poisonous drugs that cause cancer? Or will you join clifylq and stop this evil being caused by our own evil government?

    What if I told you cancer is simply the lack of enzymes and nutritional deficiency to one’s body! Would you buy that! Such diseases’ as pellagra or scurvy was once a dreaded disease and many British soldiers on ships died from it. Later it was proven to be a lack of citrus/vitamin C in their diet. Ask yourselves ladies have you or anyone in your family died from scurvy or pellagra? Have you even heard of said diseases? Do you have a shortage of Nitrilosides in your body?

    The saying,- “you are what you eat is very true and especially today when our own evil government is purposely polluting our food, air, and water with all sorts of chemicals. To include the toxic concoctions they pour into vaccines or flu shots to give us and our kids using the BS ruse of preventing the flu.

    I know it’s hard to believe ladies that our own evil government is trying to kill off 80% of the population and especially the women in this world, but it’s true! Don’t believe me ladies do your own research. Take a good look in the recommended books in the back chapters and click on to the links I provide under resources to find out clifylq is telling the truth and you women in America need to join with me to rise up and fight those who are doing this to us all!!

    I prove in my www.clifylq.com web site that your marching for the Susan G Komen kinds of groups to raise breast cancer research money is a waste of your time and money. The Komen group just gives your marching dollars to their affiliates at Planned Parenthood and to Abortion Clinics. The very groups that help cause the cancer you want to cure. How sick is that and how stupid does that make you ladies feel that for over 50 years you have been duped like this? To march for breast cancer for a good purpose of helping your loved ones or yourself from the evil of cancer when all along the Komen groups are laughing at you ladies all the way to their Zionist owned and operated banks making them rich and not curing cancer. Using such slogans as,-

    “Everyone Deserves A Lifetime.” Which should more accurately read,
    “Everyone Deserves A Lifetime of Paying” us your money.

    Join clifylq and unite with him to finally rise up in ONE FEMALE VOICE that you will STOP the cancer not only in our bodies, but ALSO THE CANCER OVER US in our own government who are behind the cause of cancer and those who are stopping its cure once and for all!!

    LADIES OF AMERICA UNITE IN ONE VOICE with me…

    ”WE ARE MAD AS HELL AND WE AIN’T GOING TO TAKE IT ANY MORE!!”


    clifylq

    Contact me here:
    E: clifylq@aol.com
    P: 760-751-9557

    Be sure to ask how you can get clifylq's 108 page E-Book titled,-
    The Quacks Who Cured Cancer" and our logos to help us spread the word
    http://cliffs3-daywalk.com/


    REMEMBER LADIES



    ADASSAH ZIONISTS JOINS SUSAN G. KOMEN FOR THE CURE BS

    NEW YORK - November 23, 2009 - Alarmed by the breast cancer epidemic in this country, Hadassah, the Women's Zionist Organization of America is joining Susan G. Komen for the Cure®, the world's largest breast cancer organization, and others in addressing the recent news on breast cancer screenings. In addition, Hadassah and Komen for the Cure have pledged to work together to address the global plight of breast cancer. http://ww5.komen.org/KomenNewsArticle.aspx?id=6442451524

    THE JEWISH ABORTION INDUSTRY

    Just as this race of people dominates all "progressive" movements in the West, so do Jews dominate the abortion business. Furthermore, Judaism is pro-abortion-by-default, since Judaism automatically champions a mother's life over her fetus' life. Indeed, says Judaism, the fetus is not human until its actual entry into the world. Christianity believes just the opposite. http://clifylq.livejournal.com/29467.html

    There are roughly 1.3 million legal abortions performed in America each year. Of those abortions, Jewish involvement is heavy -- whether the abortion doctor is Jewish, the owner of the abortion clinic is Jewish or the clinic's pro-abort "family counselors" are Jewish. http://wsi.matriots.com/abortbiz.html

    * Numerous liberal Jewish groups openly support and advocate abortion, including the American Jewish Committee, the American Jewish Congress, the National Council of Jewish Women, Hadassah Women, the Federation of Reconstructionist Congregations, the Jewish Labor Committee, the Union of American Hebrew Congregations, B'nai B'rith Women, Na'amat USA, the National Council of Jewish Women, the National Federation of Temple Sisterhood, the New Jewish Agenda, North American Temple Youth, the United Synagogues of America, and the Women's League for Conservative Judaism. Many of these groups were founded for the express purpose of pushing abortion. http://clifylq.livejournal.com/109728.html

    For more information on the medical connection between abortion and breast cancer please visit ABORTION at this link,-
    http://www.conservapedia.com/Abortion

    “The most merciful thing that a family does to one of its infant members is to kill it.” Margaret Sanger, Founder of Planned Parenthood.
    http://supportbordercontrols.blogspot.com/2009/02/rothschild-sanger-kissinger-ford-carter.html

    MARGARET SANGER Started The Zionist Abortion Industry. Planned Parenthood Takes In $700 Million A Year. It’s Not About The Question Of Abortion. The legitimacy of abortion is neither here nor there. The problem lies in the fact that it is a Zionist-dominated, taxpayer-funded scam. It’s agenda is to make Zionists wealthy, and provide funds for political agendas. http://72.52.208.92/~gbpprorg/judicial-inc/81margaret_sanger_started_the_zion.htm




    EVERYONE DESERVES A LIFETIME BUT NOT WITH EVIL GROUPS LIKE SUSAN G KOMEN MISLEADING WOMEN TO MARCH FOR THEIR PROFIT ALL THE WAY TO ZIONIST BANKS. GET YOUR COPY OF MY E-BOOK TO SEE HOW OTHER MEN AND WOMEN HAVE ALREADY CURED CANCER WITH PROOF OF ITS CURE.
    http://cliffs3-daywalk.com/



    Current Mood: angry
    Sunday, December 16th, 2012
    1:42 pm
    OBAMA MURDERS 18 KIDS IN NEWTOWN TO GAIN SUPPORT FOR GUN CONTROL IN AMERICA SICK BASTARD

    ........................................... http://clifylq.livejournal.com/123682.html





    PHONEY TEARS FROM A MASS MURDERER OF CHILDREN
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2h1QNTQDnoU

    “meaningful action” regardless of the politics of gun control in America


    NEWTOWN SCHOOL SHOOTING STORY ALREADY BEING CHANGED BY THE MEDIA TO ELIMINATE EYEWITNESS REPORTS OF A SECOND SHOOTER.

    December 14th, 2012

    (NaturalNews) – The national media is ablaze today with coverage of the tragic elementary school shooting in Newtown, CT, where 27 people have reportedly been killed, including 18 children.

    As always, when violent shootings take place, honest journalists are forced to ask the question:

    “Does this fit the pattern of other staged shootings?”

    One of the most important red flags of a staged shooting is a second gunman, indicating the shooting was coordinated and planned. There are often mind control elements at work in many of these shootings. The Aurora “Batman” shooter James Holmes, for example, was a graduate student actually working on mind control technologies funded by the U.S. government. There were also chemical mind control elements linked to Jared Lee Loughner, the shooter of Congresswomen Giffords in Arizon in 2011.

    When key elements of the story keeps changing, something is fishy
    Journalists are trained to ask questions, and one of the questions I have right now is: Why was the second gunman suddenly dropped from media coverage after the first few hours of this story developing?

    And why is there always a second gunman in these recent mass shootings that seem to be engineered to maximize emotional shock value due to the sheer horror of all the innocent deaths?

    This story is continuing to develop, and we'll keep asking questions here on Natural News. Our hearts and prayers go out to the children and families impacted by this violent tragedy. Given the terrible loss of life that has taken place here, shouldn't we all seek to get to the bottom of WHY these shootings all seem to fit a common pattern of multiple mind-controlled shooters followed by an almost immediate media cover-up of the facts?

    For the sake of those children who were killed today, I want to get to the bottom of this and expose the REAL story, for the purpose of stopping this violence from targeting yet more innocents in the future. http://www.naturalnews.com/038352_school_shooting_lone_gunman_media_cover-up.html

    Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/038352_school_shooting_lone_gunman_media_cover-up.html#ixzz2FKSPP0Lv



    http://www.libertygunrights.com/TreatySet10Pgs.pdf


    According to multiple eyewitness reports from Aurora, Colorado, including at least one caught on camera by mainstream media news reports in Colorado, James Holmes did not operate alone. There was a second shooter involved. But the media quickly eliminated any mention of a second shooter from its coverage, resorting to the typical cover story of a “lone gunman.”

    COLORADO BATMAN SHOOTING SHOWS OBVIOUS SIGNS OF BEING STAGED

    Friday, July 20, 2012
    by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger
    Editor of NaturalNews.com

    (NaturalNews) James Holmes, the Aurora, Colorado shooter who reportedly opened fire at a Batman movie premiere, was a medical student at the University of Colorado, pursuing a PhD in neuroscience, reports ABC News. (http://abcnews.go.com/US/mass-shooting-colorado-movie-theater-14-peop...)

    As part of the attack, Holmes painted his hair red and referred to himself as "The Joker," one of the arch enemies in the DC Comics-inspired Batman movie series. (http://newyork.cbslocal.com/2012/07/20/police-14-dead-in-colorado-the...)

    According to news reports, this sudden violent rampage was completely out of character for James Holmes, who was described as "shy."

    The New York Times is now reporting:

    Billy Kromka, a pre-med student at the University of Colorado, Boulder, worked with Mr. Holmes for three months last summer as a research assistant in a lab of at the Anschutz Medical Campus. Mr. Kromka said he was surprised to learn Mr. Holmes was the shooting suspect. "It was just shocking, because there was no way I thought he could have the capacity to do commit an atrocity like this," he said. (http://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/21/us/colorado-mall-shooting.html?page...)

    "He spent much of his time immersed in the computer, often participating in role-playing online games..."

    There is already conjecture that James Holmes may have been involved in mind-altering neuroscience research and ended up becoming involved at a depth he never anticipated. His actions clearly show a strange detachment from reality, indicating he was not in his right mind. That can only typically be accomplished through drugs, hypnosis or trauma (and sometimes all three).

    His behavior doesn't add

    His behavior already reveals stark inconsistencies that question the mainstream explanation of events. For example, he opened fire on innocent people but then calmly surrendered to police without resistance. This is not consistent with the idea of "killing everyone."

    Furthermore, he then admitted to police that his apartment was booby-trapped with explosives. If you were really an evil-minded Joker trying to kill people (including cops), why would you warn them about the booby trap in advance? It doesn't add up.

    "Holmes was taken into custody shortly after the shooting, police said, adding he didn't resist when he was arrested," reports a local CBS news affiliate (http://newyork.cbslocal.com/2012/07/20/police-14-dead-in-colorado-the...).

    "After his arrest, Holmes told police about 'possible explosives in his residence,' Oates said. When police searched his apartment, they discovered it was booby-trapped and evacuated surrounding buildings, police said. Oates said bomb technicians are determining how to disarm flammable or explosive material in the third-floor apartment. He said police could be there some time."

    None of this checks out. If you're a killer bent on causing mayhem, why tell the police about your surprise bomb waiting for them back at your apartment?

    Holmes was clearly provided with exotic gear (and bomb-making skills)

    Continuing from CBS:

    "He said pictures from inside the apartment are fairly disturbing and the devices look to be sophisticated, adding the booby-traps were 'something I've never seen.' One rifle, two handguns, a knife, a bullet proof vest, a ballistic helmet, a gas device, a gas mask, military SWAT clothing and unidentified explosives were also found in Holmes' car, a law enforcement source told CBS News. Oates said Holmes wore a gas mask, a ballistic helmet and vest as well as leg, groin and throat protectors during the shooting."

    Added on July 22nd: "He allegedly wore a helmet, a throat guard, a ballistic vest, ballistic leggings and gloves and was dressed in black." (http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/explosives-removed-from-james-...)

    In other words, this guy was equipped with exotic gear by someone with connections to military equipment. SWAT clothing, explosives, complex booby-traps... c'mon, this isn't a "lone gunman." This is somebody who was selected for a mission, given equipment to carry it out, then somehow brainwashed into getting it done.

    "Aurora Police Chief Dan Oates said Holmes' apartment is booby-trapped with a 'sophisticated' maze of flammable devices. It could take hours or days for authorities to disarm it," reports Yahoo News (http://sg.sports.yahoo.com/blogs/lookout/suspect-neuroscience-phd-stu...).

    UPDATE: (This section added to the story Saturday at 2:30 pm central, July 21, 2012). It is now being reported that exotic, advanced booby-traps have been disarmed at the apartment of James Holmes. The Denver affiliate of CBS News is now reporting: (http://denver.cbslocal.com/2012/07/21/officials-expect-explosions-as-...)

    Officials say they have removed all major threats at the booby-trapped apartment of the Aurora movie theater shooting suspect on Saturday. They have used a robot to go inside James Holmes' apartment. ...They were able to disable a trip wire that was set to go off when the apartment door was opened. "This is some serious stuff that our team is dealing with..."

    Shortly before noon crews were successful performing a controlled detonation... More controlled detonations were possible.

    ...there were multiple trip wires throughout the apartment. Investigators have also seen what appear to be mortars planted in the apartment -- sort of the kind of mortars that might be seen in a commercial fireworks show. Up to a half dozen of them are scattered around.

    ...they have seen a number of inflated balloons in the apartment... with many appearing to be filled with a powder. Also linked together are bottles of liquid. ...a strong smell of gasoline emanating from the apartment.

    ...several boxes on top of the refrigerator and there are lights flashing on the boxes.

    ...30 aerial shells (fireworks) commercially legally available for purchase. ...the suspect may have filled them with smokeless powder. ...entering the apartment would have caused a trip wire to trigger one liquid container to pour/mix with another. When the two mix together, they set off the main charge of the device which may be additional flammable liquids.

    ...an enormously dangerous mission. About 100 personnel are on scene.

    And the BBC is now reporting: (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-18937726)

    Technicians made a first attempt on Friday to disarm the traps, believed to include explosives, but withdrew when it became clear the property was too dangerous to enter. Sgt Carlson said the device was set up to detonate when the first person entered the flat. "We've defeated first threat. It was set up to kill, and that could have been police officers or anything," she said.

    "In addition to the shells found in the apartment, jars of a kind of accelerant were also found inside the dwelling, said Aurora Police Sgt. Cassidee Carlson." (http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000087239639044446430457754103267932...) "Aurora Police Chief Dan Oates expressed frustration on Friday with the web of wires and devices Mr. Holmes had connected inside his apartment, which were hindering the investigation into the shooting. ...It was unlike anything he had seen before."

    FBI has a track record of staging similar assaults, then stopping them at the last minute

    This is not your run-of-the-mill crime of passion. It was a carefully planned, heavily funded and technically advanced attack. Who might be behind all this? The FBI, of course, which has a long history of setting up and staging similar attacks, then stopping them right before they happen. See four documented stories on these facts:

    http://www.naturalnews.com/035849_domestic_terror_plots_FBI.html
    http://www.naturalnews.com/034325_FBI_entrapment_terror_plots.html
    http://www.naturalnews.com/033751_FBI_terrorism.html
    http://www.naturalnews.com/035757_FBI_terror_plots_false_flag.html

    As you soak all this in, remember that the FBI had admitted to setting up terror plots, providing the weapons and gear, staging the location of the bombings and even driving the vehicles to pull it off! This is not a conspiracy theory, it's been admitted by the FBI right out in the open. Even the New York Times openly reports all this in stories like this one:

    NYT: Terrorist Plots, Hatched by the F.B.I. (http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/29/opinion/sunday/terrorist-plots-help...)

    THE United States has been narrowly saved from lethal terrorist plots in recent years -- or so it has seemed. A would-be suicide bomber was intercepted on his way to the Capitol; a scheme to bomb synagogues and shoot Stinger missiles at military aircraft was developed by men in Newburgh, N.Y.; and a fanciful idea to fly explosive-laden model planes into the Pentagon and the Capitol was hatched in Massachusetts. But all these dramas were facilitated by the F.B.I., whose undercover agents and informers posed as terrorists offering a dummy missile, fake C-4 explosives, a disarmed suicide vest and rudimentary training. ...the F.B.I. provided a van loaded with six 55-gallon drums of "inert material," harmless blasting caps, a detonator cord and a gallon of diesel fuel to make the van smell flammable. An undercover F.B.I. agent even did the driving...

    Comment added for clarification: I'm on the record saying, in the video posted below, that the FBI is "80% good guys" and "20% bad guys," which is typical for almost any law enforcement organization. Most FBI men and women are working in the interests of upholding the law. It's only a relatively small number who engage in the kind of terrorism training mentioned by the New York Times, above.

    Mystery man Holmes has no background

    On top of all this, Holmes apparently has no background. "He's not on anybody's radar screen -- nothing," said a peace officer in a NYT article. "This guy is somewhat of an enigma. Nobody knows anything about him." (http://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/21/us/colorado-mall-shooting.html)

    Mr. Holmes's only criminal history is a traffic summons, the authorities said. He earned a bachelor's degree with honors in neuroscience in 2010 from the University of California, Riverside, and was a graduate student in neurosciences at the University of Colorado at Denver's Anschutz Medical Campus... He was currently collecting unemployment...

    Question: How does an unemployed medical student afford $20,000 in weapons gear?

    If you start to look at the really big picture here, the obvious question arises: How does an unemployed medical student afford all the complex weapons gear, bomb-making gear, "flammable" booby trap devices, ammunition, multiple magazines, bullet-proof vest, groin protection, ballistic helmet, SWAT uniform and all the rest of it?

    Added July 22nd: "Police said Holmes spent months amassing explosives, weapons and ammunition." (http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/explosives-removed-from-james-...)

    A decent AR-15 rifle costs $1,000 or more all by itself. The shotgun and handgun might run another $800 total. Spare mags, sights, slings, and so on will run you at least another $1,000 across three firearms. The bullet-proof vest is easily another $800, and the cost of the bomb-making gear is anybody's guess. With all the specialty body gear, ammunition, booby-trap devices and more, I'm guessing this is at least $20,000 in weapons and tactical gear, much of which is very difficult for civilians to get in the first place. Comment added: Don't forget the cost of all the training (thousands of dollars) and the bomb-making equipment. Holmes reportedly had 30 improvised grenades, mortars, binary liquids that explode when mixed, wires, exotic bomb equipment... this gets expensive very quickly (even if you can source this equipment!)

    The mere manufacture of an explosive booby-trap device is, all by itself, a felony crime by the way. And remember: "Aurora Police Chief Dan Oates said Holmes' apartment is booby-trapped with a 'sophisticated' maze of flammable devices. It could take hours or days for authorities to disarm it," reported Yahoo News (http://sg.sports.yahoo.com/blogs/lookout/suspect-neuroscience-phd-stu...).

    Question: Where does an unemployed, introverted medical school student get the training to deploy sophisticated booby traps, tactical body armor, weapons systems and more? Certainly not in graduate school!

    All this leads to an obvious third party influence over all this. Someone else taught this guy these skills and funded the acquisition of the equipment.

    Update: An article posted on Sunday by the Daily Mail reveals Holmes had a "'mind-boggling' stash of ammunition" and "three types of explosives were found - jars filled with accelerates, chemicals that would explode when mixed together and more than 30 improvised grenades." This further adds to the financial cost tally of what it took to put all this together. (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2177156/James-Holmes-Dark-Kni...)

    The Wall Street Journal is also now reporting: "the suspect bought four guns over the past 60 days, and over the Internet bought 3,000 rounds for an assault rifle, 3,000 rounds for Glock handguns and about 300 shotgun rounds. The suspect also had a 100-round drum-style magazine for the assault rifle that would have allowed him to fire 50 to 60 rounds a minute." (http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000087239639044446430457754103267932..)

    Note: Some readers have questioned the $20,000 figure estimated here, saying this gear could have been acquired for only $10,000 or so. I doubt that, as all the extras that you need to effectively run these guns cost a lot of money: training courses, spare magazines, etc. Just a decent AR-15 battle sight (a holographic red dot sight) can run $1,000 - $2,000. Search "ACOG" if you don't believe me. It is also reported that Holmes bought 6,000 rounds of ammo, which definitely isn't cheap either, especially given that we now know half of those rounds were rifle rounds. It's clear this guy was spending big bucks. Whether it's $10k or $20k isn't really that much of a point.

    Staged just in time for a vote on the UN small arms treaty?

    More and more, this shooting is looking like a deliberate plot staged by the government itself much like Operation Fast and Furious pulled off by the ATF (http://www.naturalnews.com/032934_ATF_illegal_firearms.html) which helped smuggle tens of thousands of guns into Mexico for the purpose of causing "gun violence" in the USA, then blaming the Second Amendment for it.

    All this looks like James Holmes completed a "mission" and then calmly ended that mission by surrendering to police and admitting everything. The mission, as we are now learning, was to cause as much terror and mayhem as possible, then to have that multiplied by the national media at exactly the right time leading up the UN vote next week on a global small arms treaty that could result in gun confiscation across America. (http://lewrockwell.com/eddlem/eddlem61.1.html)

    Even Forbes.com wrote about this quite extensively, warning readers about the coming gun confiscation effort related to the UN treaty. The story was authored by Larry Bell (http://www.forbes.com/sites/larrybell/2011/06/07/u-n-agreement-should...) and says the UN treaty could "override our national sovereignty, and in the process, provide license for the federal government to assert preemptive powers over state regulatory powers guaranteed by the Tenth Amendment in addition to our Second Amendment rights."

    In other words, this has all the signs of Fast & Furious, Episode II. I wouldn't be surprised to discover someone in Washington was behind it all. After all, there's no quicker way to disarm a nation and take total control over the population than to stage violence, blame it on firearms, then call for leaders to "do something!" Such calls inevitably end up resulting in gun confiscation, and it's never too long after that before government genocide really kicks in like we saw with Hitler, Stalin, Pol Pot, Mao and other tyrants.

    Governments routinely murder millions

    Here's a short list of government mass murder carried out throughout history, almost always immediately following the disarmament of the public (and usually involving staged false flag events to justify the disarmament):

    50+ million dead: Mao Ze-Dong (China, 1958-61 and 1966-69, Tibet 1949-50)


    12+ million dead: Adolf Hitler (Germany, 1939-1945) - concentration camps, civilian deaths and dead Russian POWs


    8+ million dead: Leopold II of Belgium (Congo, 1886-1908)


    6+ million dead: Jozef Stalin (USSR, 1932-39)


    5+ million dead: Hideki Tojo (Japan, 1941-44)


    2+ million dead: Ismail Enver (Turkey, 1915-22)


    1.7 million dead: Pol Pot (Cambodia, 1975-79)


    1.6 million dead: Kim Il Sung (North Korea, 1948-94)


    1.5 million dead: Menghistu (Ethiopia, 1975-78)


    1 million dead: Yakubu Gowon (Biafra, 1967-1970)


    900,000 dead: Leonid Brezhnev (Afghanistan, 1979-1982)


    800,000 dead: Jean Kambanda (Rwanda, 1994)

    See more at:

    http://www.scaruffi.com/politics/dictat.html

    Death by government:

    http://www.hawaii.edu/powerkills/DBG.CHAP1.HTM
    http://www.infowars.com/democide-government-killed-over-260-million-i...

    A "monopoly of force" in government is far more dangerous than a crazed lone shooter

    So yes, James Holmes and other crazed shooters kill a number of people each year in random acts of violence. It's horrifying and wrong, but it's nothing compared to the millions of lives that governments tend to destroy when they gain total power over the populace.

    The most dangerous thing in the world, it turns out, is not a crazy person with a rifle; it's a government with a "monopoly of force" over the entire population. And that's exactly what the UN spells out as its goal for the world: Stripping all power from individual citizens and handing "monopolies of force" to the governments of the world, shoring up their positions as the only "legitimate" power on the planet.

    See this document entitled, "Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces (DCAF)" policy paper No. 24:

    http://www.naturalnews.com/files/Revisiting-the-State-Monopoly-on-the...

    As this document reveals, a table entitled "Governance solutions for reasserting the state monopoly on the use of force" lists the options available to governments to re-establish "monopolies of force" against their own people:

    • (Re-)establish state monopoly

    - Ownership of WMDs
    - Safety Inspectorates

    • Prohibit business activity

    - Justice and Execution
    - Deadly Force?

    • Regulate/limit activities

    - Private defense/security services
    - Control of financial transfers
    - Export controls
    - Transport and infrastructure safety
    - Environmental impact

    Interestingly, that document also describes "terrorism" in a way that perfectly matches the Aurora, Colorado "Batman" movie theater shooter:

    Terrorists aim to spread panic and fear in societies in order to achieve political goals, be they based on left- or right-wing, social-revolutionary, nationalistic or religious ideologies. They are organized in a clandestine way, most often in small groups and cells... Typical tactical means include kidnapping, hostage-taking, sabotage, murder, suicide attacks, vehicle bombs and improvised explosive devices.

    A global monopoly of force

    This document is a goldmine of information about the globalist agenda to disarm and enslave the population. Check out page 28, which reads:

    The legitimate monopoly of force should not be limited to the nation-state but should be based on the local, national, regional and the global levels.

    Global Security Governance and the Monopoly of Force

    At the global level no monopoly of violence exists. The UN Security Council already has a monopoly power to authorize the use of force at the global level, although the UN was never given the necessary means to exercise this authority, such as the capacity to implement sanctions, a police force and armed forces...

    This deficiency in global governance acts as a bottleneck and a barrier to the creation of the democratically legitimized monopoly of violence that is globally required.

    This story gets deep, doesn't it? Watch for more analysis here at NaturalNews.com, where we still fight for liberty and justice in a world that's increasingly becoming enslaved.

    UPDATE: Follow-up story now posted that asks the question: Why did no one fight back?

    That story is available now at NaturalNews.com:

    http://www.naturalnews.com/036537_James_Holmes_Batman_shooting.html
    http://www.naturalnews.com/036536_James_Holmes_shooting_false_flag.html






    UPDATE: Aurora, Colorado already had strict gun control laws in place!
    After this article was published, it became known that Aurora, Colorado has strict anti-gun laws in place, including laws that criminalize carrying concealed weapons.

    Thus, the city officials of Aurora actually created an environment in which victims would be unarmed and at a considerable disadvantage against an armed attacked.

    Read more details about this here:
    http://www.naturalnews.com/036549_Aurora_concealed_carry_gun_confisca...


    Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/036537_James_Holmes_Batman_shooting.html#ixzz2FG1An8zx



    clifylq

    http://www.clifylq.com/
    http://clifylq.livejournal.com/
    http://clifylq.blogspot.com/
    http://www.myspace.com/434997466/blog
    http://supportbordercontrols.blogspot.com/
    http://clifylq.livejournal.com/calendar



    TODAY THE EXACT THING IS HAPPENING WITH NEWTON, CT SCHOOL SHOOTING AMERICA!!


    http://clifylq.livejournal.com/123682.html


    HONORING THE VICTIMS OF THE TRAGEDY IN NEWTOWN, CONNECTICUT




    Obama can appear before the public and tell them that he does not intend to pursue any legislation (in the United States) that will lead to new gun control laws, while cloaked in secrecy, his Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton is committing the US to international treaties and foreign gun control laws. Does that mean Obama is telling the truth? What it means is that there will be no publicized gun control debates in the media or votes in Congress. We will wake up one morning and find that the United States has signed a treaty that prohibits firearm and ammunition manufacturers from selling to the public. We will wake up another morning and find that the US has signed a treaty that prohibits any transfer of firearm ownership. And then, we will wake up yet another morning and find that the US has signed a treaty that requires US citizens to deliver any firearm they own to the local government collection and destruction center or face imprisonment.
    http://www.dailypaul.com/162171/very-serious-warningobama-finds-legal-way-around-the-2nd-amendment-and-uses-it




    BY THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

    A PROCLAMATION

    As a mark of respect for the victims of the senseless acts of violence perpetrated on December 14, 2012, in Newtown, Connecticut, by the authority vested in me as President of the United States by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, I hereby order that the flag of the United States shall be flown at half-staff at the White House and upon all public buildings and grounds, at all military posts and naval stations, and on all naval vessels of the Federal Government in the District of Columbia and throughout the United States and its Territories and possessions until sunset, December 18, 2012. I also direct that the flag shall be flown at half-staff for the same length of time at all United States embassies, legations, consular offices, and other facilities abroad, including all military facilities and naval vessels and stations.

    IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this fourteenth day of December, in the year of our Lord two thousand twelve, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-seventh.

    BARACK OBAMA AKA BARRY SOETERO AKA BARRY DUNHAM AKA BARRY OBAMA AKA BARACK DUNHAM
    http://clifylq.livejournal.com/101780.html




    Defenseless people rounded up and exterminated in the 20th Century because of gun control: 56 million. http://supportbordercontrols.blogspot.com/2009/03/evil-jews-behind-gun-control-in-america.html

    "The most foolish mistake we could possibly make would be to allow the subject races to possess arms. History shows that all conquerors who have allowed their subject races to carry arms have prepared their own downfall by so doing. Indeed, I would go so far as to say that the supply of arms to the underdogs is a sine qua non for the overthrow of any sovereignty. So let's not have any native militia or native police. German troops alone will bear the sole responsibility for the maintenance of law and order throughout the occupied Russian territories, and a system of military strong-points must be evolved to cover the entire occupied country." --Adolf Hitler http://constitutionalistnc.tripod.com/hitler-leftist/id14.html





    AMERICA WHY DOES CLIFYLQ SAY WE SHOULD ELECT PUTIN FOR PRESIDENT OVER AMERICA AND JAIL THE PRESIDENTIAL IMPERSONATOR BARRY SOETERO IN OFFICE BEING PUPPETED AROUND BY ZIONIST JEW GANGSTERS? REVIEW THESE LINKS FOR THE ANSWER: http://www.realjewnews.com/?p=646, http://clifylq.livejournal.com/111118.html

    Current Mood: angry
    Sunday, September 9th, 2012
    3:45 pm
    OBAMA FRENCH KISSES A MAN SHOWING HOW GAY HE IS TO MICHAEL OBAMA AND OPRAH TO BE THE PRESIDENT

    ....................................... http://clifylq.livejournal.com/119788.html





    OBAMA'S STATE OF THE UNION ADDRESS FOR HOMOSEXUALS/PEDOPHILES, ILLEGAL ALIENS, AFRICANS, ZIONIST ETC

    "As your President, I will use the bully pulpit to urge states to treat same-sex couples with full equality in their family and adoption laws," Obama said. http://www.rense.com/general81/obbm.htm

    Washington DC (CNA) -- Presidential candidate Senator Barack Obama has promised to use the presidency as a "bully pulpit" for homosexual activism, according to an open letter released on his campaign website.

    In the February 28 letter posted under the "LGBT" section of the "People" heading, Senator Obama said he would press for the passage of hate crime laws and a "fully inclusive" Employment Non-Discrimination Act, which would outlaw discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity. http://www.rense.com/general81/obbm.htm
    http://clifylq.livejournal.com/109266.html



    Men who have reportedly had sexual relations with Barack Obama
    * Donald Young, TUCC Choir director
    * Larry Sinclair, gay escort
    * Reggie Love, White House presidential assistant and Obama’s “body man”
    * Artur Davis, US Representative from Alabama and gubernatorial candidate
    * Bill Frist, former GOP Senate Majority Leader
    * Deval Patrick, Governor of Massachusetts




    THE CLEAR AND PRESENT BLACKMAIL THREAT

    Leading secret alternate life styles, Obama and his chief of staff provide classic blackmail threats. Considering Obama’s choice for the Supreme Court, Elena Kagan, who is reputedly a semi-open lesbian, the question must be posed how much Obama’s and Emanuel’s own covert life styles led to the decision to nominate Kagan, someone with no experience on a judicial bench. Similarly, the fact that so much is known about Obama’s and Emanuel’s trysts in Chicago begs another important question. If politicians, gay community activists, and journalists in the Windy City are aware of Obama’s and Emanuel’s highly blackmailable gay life styles, the same can certainly hold true for the executives of one of Chicago’s corporate headquarters — that of BP America’s Production Operations.

    Throw in the intelligence agencies of America’s allies, friends, enemies, and the situation becomes a clear and present danger to the national security of the United States. http://fellowshipofminds.wordpress.com/2010/05/27/washington-insider-obama-member-of-chicago-gay-mans-club/





    PRESIDENTIAL HOPEFUL LEAVES US FOR HIV TREATMENT
    http://supportbordercontrols.blogspot.com/2011/05/how-cock-one-can-be-clear-and-present.html


    THE RESIDENT'S SUPPORT FOR GAY MARRIAGE ROCKS THE BLACK CHURCH

    Larry Platt

    With President Obama's now public endorsement of same-sex marriage heating up the national media spotlight, the controversial stance has now reached into the platform of the Black church, sparking a divisive argument between ministers and members of the African-American community.

    Holding onto steadfast principles of the Bible defining marriage as a sacred union between a man and a woman, many ministers feel that the President has not only turned his back on the African-American community but has also favored the issue of gay marriage over more pertinent issues involving the African-American community. According to The Christian Post, Dr. Ken Hutcherson, pastor of Antioch Baptist Church in Redmond, WA stated:

    "I would never vote for someone who believes in same-sex marriage and abortion, "regardless who it is, regardless how white they are, regardless how black they are." http://www.examiner.com/article/obama-s-gay-marriage-support-rocks-the-black-church



    .............. http://clifylq.livejournal.com/95202.html





    MICHELLE OBAMA'S ENORMOUS SECRET

    by prophetessdebbie on November 10, 2008

    Friends in Christ, I’ve known something shocking about Mrs. Obama for quite some time. Don’t be mad at me for not telling you all — or the American people. You see, the Lord Jesus told me, but asked that I kept it quiet until after the election. It is not ours to question why. No, I did not want to obey this request, but the last time I broke a promise to Jesus He killed my favorite niece in a fiery car crash eight weeks later.

    Friends, look closely at the picture above and you will soon see the secret I’ve been hiding for Jesus. See how pretty Laura Bush looks and how her height is normal? Mrs. Bush’s height reflects her place in a Christian marriage — she is less than her husband. Now, see how “Michelle” Obama is the same height as a man? (It’s hard to tell, what with that unfortunate hair those people have, but she may even be taller than Mr. Bush — and no woman should ever be taller than a President, for it shows a complete lack of respect.) Well, that is hardly a coincidence that she is as tall as a man! ”She” is, after all, a man! In certain photographs, when the light hits just right, you can see the outline of a male organ flopping about under his dress. Notice how this dress is draped high above the waist and how (s)he often wears very “full” skirts and dresses? This is simply craftily employing the power of fashion of hoodwink the American people.

    I have spoken with Baptist specialists in the field of Gender Hysteria and they have told me, after looking at several pictures of “Mrs.” Michelle nee Michael Obama that they are 96.84% certain that (s)he is what is called a “Pre-Operative Negro Transsexual.” http://iranpoliticsclub.net/politics/ann-coulter/index.htm



    The Real Oprah Winfrey Is Fat & Ugly

    Tanks A Billion Bosses Fer Dah Money
    http://clifylq.livejournal.com/54936.html


    Oprah is the Most Dangerous Woman in the World!

    Why you ask? According to Oprah Winfrey's introduction page on the internet, the Oprah Winfrey Show is the highest rated talk show in television history, seen by 15-20 million viewers each day in the U.S., and in 132 other countries. Yet Oprah NEVER shares the Gospel of Jesus Christ with her fans. In fact, Oprah denied Jesus in front of millions of viewers. The Word of God plainly teaches that the ONLY Way to salvation is by Jesus Christ (John 14:6). Oprah denies this Truth. Oprah's show has been the number one talk show for 12 consecutive seasons. Since it's beginning in 1986 it has received 32 Emmy awards. In 1996, Oprah began Oprah's Book Club designed to get America reading again. Each of the books selected has become an instant bestseller averaging sales of over 1 million copies each. In 1997, Oprah was named Newsweek's "Most Important Person" in books and media, T.V. Guide's "Television Performer of the Year," the People's Choice Award for "Favorite Television Performer," and in 1996, Time Magazine recognized Oprah as one of America's "25 Most Influential People."

    This is why Oprah is so dangerous..she has massive influence over millions of people & is tragically using it to lead them straight into the - FIRES OF HELL!
    http://clifylq.livejournal.com/45693.html


    HELL IS 24/7

    http://www.av1611.org/hell.html


    RESOURCE LINKS OBAMA A FAGGOT MUSLIM DESTINED TO DESTROY AMERICA




    CHRIST IS A HOMOPHOBE IN AMERICA TODAY
    http://clifylq.livejournal.com/83369.html

    IN GOD WE TRUST (ED) GAY MARRIAGE, HIV & NECROTIZING FASCIITIS GOD'S WEDDING GIFT
    http://clifylq.livejournal.com/84359.html

    AMERICAN WOMEN'S ROLE IN GAY(MALE) AMERICA
    http://clifylq.livejournal.com/60081.html

    OBAMA IS A GAY MUSLIM AND NOT EVEN A U.S. CITIZEN THE PERFECT PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE '08
    http://clifylq.livejournal.com/91776.html

    OBAMA A MUSLIM/FAGGOT, PRO ABORTION/INFANTICIDE/ZIONIST ISRAEL'S WARS/ATROCITIES & NEXT PRESIDENT
    http://clifylq.livejournal.com/95202.html

    QUEERS/LESBIANS HAVE TURNED AMERICA INTO A MODERN DAY SODOM & GOMORRAH. GOD WILL BURN IT Too!
    http://clifylq.livejournal.com/21939.html

    OBAMA'S SAFE SCHOOL CZAR IS A NAMBLA PERVERT AN ORGANIZATION THAT PRACTICES SEX BETWEEN MEN AND BOYS
    http://clifylq.livejournal.com/108096.html

    OBAMA PRESIDENCY A FRAUD CAUSING A CONSTITUTIONAL MELTDOWN IN AMERICA LEADING TO CIVIL WAR
    http://clifylq.livejournal.com/99649.html





    clifylq

    http://clifylq.livejournal.com/
    http://clifylq.blogspot.com/
    http://www.myspace.com/434997466/blog
    http://supportbordercontrols.blogspot.com/
    http://clifylq.livejournal.com/calendar



    MICHELLE ROBINSON, OBAMA'S WIFE ...LOL!
    http://clifylq.livejournal.com/32491.html


    Saturday, September 1, 2007

    Obama's C.F.R. Ties Exposed by Swarming Ron Paul Supporters JonesReport.com August 29, 2007

    Members of WeAreChange Central Florida descended upon an event for Barack Obama where they exposed his wife Michelle Obama's membership in the Council on Foreign Relations, an elite extra-governmental organization that steers a global agenda within the U.S. framework. http://www.thechicagocouncil.org/chicago_council_board_directors.php


    THE 1st BLK MALADY

    IS THE MICHELLE OBAMA TAPE A MATTER OF ENUCIATION?

    A really interesting theory about the alleged Michelle Obama tape, which could explain a lot, from the liberal blog Booman Tribune. Michelle, offering a speech critical of President Bush, offers a refrain of "why'd he" — the words "why did he" mushed together — that sounds like "whitey" on the tape.

    Apparently, if the tape ever comes to light, her words will sound something like:

    Whitey cut folks off Medicaid? ........ http://www.rense.com/general80/sor.htm
    Whitey let New Orleans drown? ....... http://clifylq.livejournal.com/62723.html
    Whitey do nothing about Jena? ....... http://clifylq.livejournal.com/84517.html
    Whitey put us in Iraq for no reason?* http://clifylq.livejournal.com/49895.html

    When the real message is:
    http://clifylq.livejournal.com/91557.html



    Jesus Christ My Savior

    "I am the way, the truth, and the life. Without the way there is no going; without the truth there is no knowing; without the life there is no living. I am the way which thou shouldst pursue; the truth which thou shouldst believe; the life which thou shouldst hope for" - Jesus ... by Michelle Obama Atheist
    http://jesusforyouandme.blogspot.com/2012/06/michelle-obama-cites-jesus-as-model-for.html


    THE TRUTH:
    http://clifylq.blogspot.com/2012/06/true-name-of-satan-kabalist-say-is-that.html#comment-form


    Check google pagerank for clifylq.livejournal.com

    Current Mood: angry
    Tuesday, September 4th, 2012
    2:19 am
    ROMNEY WENT NUCLEAR ON THE OBAMA'S CAMPAIGN HOPES ASKING FOR HIS BIRTH CERTIFICATE

    http://clifylq.blogspot.com/2012/09/romney-or-obama-for-president-makes-no.html#comment-form



    OBOTS GNASHING THEIR TEETH – Resounding approval from a Michigan campaign rally crowd following comments by Mitt Romney about his birth certificate reveals that the truth is on his side when it comes to challenging the prolific lies about Obama’s identity and eligibility to be president. Most importantly, the applause demonstrated to Romney that he has at his disposal the most destructive arsenal of political weaponry ever held against a political opponent in American history…and that he has permission to use those weapons without apologies for the sake of America’s future.

    NEW YORK, NY – Mitt Romney just “went nuclear” in the 2012 President campaign.

    Speaking at a Detroit-suburb rally, Romney told a crowd of 10,000 that he and his wife were happy to be back in the state of their childhood home when he fired a “test missile” at Barack Obama’s failure to demonstrate his Natural Born eligibility to be president.

    “No one has ever asked to see my birth certificate…they know this is the place that we were born and raised,” Romney said.

    The remark received a resounding applause because the crowd knew it was in reference to evidence discovered over the past five years that Obama is ineligible to be president because he has failed to demonstrate his natural born citizenship. Regardless of Obama’s birth place, however, which has never been proven with authentic original documentation, his alleged father, Barack Obama Sr., was never a U.S. citizen.

    A natural born U.S. citizen is one born in the U.S. to two citizen parents.

    Questions have also been raised about whether Obama is lying about the identity of his real father in order to hide his un-American beliefs and his neo-communist agenda. Evidence about Obama’s past, including his childhood and college years, shows that he holds radical communist views and hatred toward, not only vintage American heritage, but white people in general. Obama has long been suspected of harboring a deep seated anger and being motivated by a long held desire for vengeance against what he sees as the injustices of colonialism and economic supremacy by nonmelanic cultures.

    After the video of Romney’s remarks were posted on YouTube, liberal operatives began firing emails to one another organizing a group effort to descend on the site and post “dislike” ratings and criticism toward Romney. Site statistics shows that videos of Romney’s remarks are receiving a disproportionate number of responses compared with other posts.

    Unlike Barack Obama, Mitt Romney is a natural born citizen of the United States because he was born in the U.S. to two citizen parents. Therefore, Romney is eligible to be a presidential candidate under Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 of the U.S. Constitution.

    Mitt Romney’s father was born in Mexico but became a naturalized citizen of the U.S. prior to Romney’s birth in Michigan while Romney’s mother has always been a U.S. citizen.

    Romney has never attempted to hide documentation alluding to his constitutional eligibility like Obama has.

    Hawaii officials have repeatedly refused to verify the existence of, or authenticate content in, Obama’s original birth certificate which they claim is on file in that state’s Health Department. Explicit requests for the original paper documentation of Obama’s alleged birth in Hawaii have been denied by officials which raises doubts that an original document even exists.

    In response to pervasive questions about Obama’s birth in April 2011, document forgers working on behalf of Obama posted to an official government website what has since been proven by a law enforcement investigation to be a digitally fabricated computer image of an alleged 1961 birth certificate. The criminals have yet to be indentified.

    An image of Obama’s alleged 1980 selective service registration card has also been shown to be a forgery. Maricopa County law enforcement officials showed that the card is only one of millions ever processed by the postal service using a two-digit year receipt stamp, while all others submitted have always been stamped with a four-digit year stamp. The card also shows that Obama allegedly signed it a day before it was stamped.

    Investigators suspect the document was forged for Obama because he never registered for selective service. Failure to do so would disqualify him from being president.

    Judges in the U.S. are also hiding from the issue of Obama’s eligibility, refusing to review any of nearly 130 lawsuits on the merits of the actual evidence, fearing the discovery of the evidence would show that Obama is actually a fraud and liar. Essentially judges have cowered to political fears, dismissing the cases based on a false argument that plaintiffs don’t have standing. No case yet has been allowed to move forward on discovery of evidence, let alone been examined under an actual legal argument citing precedent.

    Of course, a frightened Obama campaign desperately tried to deflect reaction to the remark, saying Romney was embracing “the most strident voices in his party instead of standing up to them.” http://beforeitsnews.com/obama-birthplace-controversy/2012/08/romney-fires-birth-certificate-test-missile-and-hits-target-with-home-crowd-2444700.html



    http://www.veteranstoday.com/2012/08/14/paul-ryans-socially-destructive-agenda/




    PAUL RYAN'S SOCIALLY DESTRUCTIVE AGENDA
    by Stephen Lendman

    Ryan and other Republican House Budget Committee members call it “The Path to Prosperity: A Blueprint for American Renewal.”

    Key is gutting vital programs millions of Americans rely on. Ryan wants Medicare privatized as well as Medicaid, food stamps, and and other entitlement programs ended.

    Later, he wants Social Security privatized en route to ending it altogether.

    Medicaid is welfare for low-income beneficiaries. Washington and states co-fund it. It’s managed at the state level.

    Social Security and Medicare are insurance programs, not entitlements. Worker-employer payroll tax deductions fund them. They’re contractual federal obligations to eligible recipients. Gutting them is irresponsible and socially destructive. Like Republicans, Obama and most Democrats are committed to doing it.

    Social security provides vital retirement, disability, survivorship, and death benefits. It’s America’s most effective poverty reduction program. It’s worked remarkably well since inception.

    It’s the debt, stupid, America’s “fiscal cliff,” they claim. Gutting social programs assures unrestricted military spending, maintaining tax cuts for rich elites, cutting amounts corporations pay, and sustaining handouts to bankers and other corporate favorites.

    It’s not going bankrupt. When properly administered, it’s sound and secure. It needs only modest adjustments at times to assure it.

    Medicare is America’s largest health insurance program. Millions of seniors, disabled people under age 65, and other eligible recipients rely on it.

    Ryan wants social spending cut to 1949 levels. Around $5 trillion is proposed for starters over the next decade. Doing so will create jobs and promote growth, he claims. His budget balancing plan falls on the backs of ordinary people.

    His program assures America’s resources go to rich elites, bankers, war profiteers, and other corporate favorites.

    “Prioritize national security by preventing deep, indiscriminate cuts to defense,” he says.

    Repeal Obamacare. “Advance bipartisan solutions that take power away from government bureaucrats and put patients in control.”

    Last March, the House adopted a budget resolution. It adopted much of what Ryan proposed. Ten Republicans opposed him. They want bigger cuts. Democrats endorse slightly less austere ones than Ryan. America’s poor, disadvantaged, and moderate income earners are largely shut out of his plan.

    In 2011, he proposed eliminating Medicare altogether. It passed the House but not the Senate.

    Ryan claims his plan is responsible deficit cutting. The late Bob Chapman disagreed. He envisioned no change in out-of-control spending. The deficit will accelerate, not shrink, he explained.

    Ryan’s plan reshuffles the deck chairs. Most of what’s cut is redirected to America’s wealthy and corporate favorites. Lawmakers know exactly what they’re doing, said Chapman. The nation is headed for Banana Republic status, he explained.

    He saw no reality checking, no restraint, no attempt to stop deficit hemorrhaging, and no control over America’s war machine. He called forced austerity a formula for “economic chaos.”

    Criminals are running the country. Annual $1 – 2 trillion deficits will persist for years. Debt amounts are so great, they won’t be paid. Limits will be raised. Social spending cuts will grow until America’s safety net is entirely gutted.

    Gradualism is how he’ll do it. A bipartisan majority agrees. Ryan’s plan follows recommendations from Obama’s two deficit cutting commissions. Simpson/Bowles and Dominici/Rivlin proposed “restoring America’s future” by destroying it for ordinary households hit hardest.

    Instead of stimulus when it’s most needed, they want America’s poor, disadvantaged, and others of limited means bearing the burden of America’s war machine and letting super-rich elites get richer. Greater inequality and poverty are assured.

    Their ideal society is no fit place to live in. Ryan’s “Path to Prosperity” wants America returned to 19th century harshness. His entire agenda reflects reactionary extremism. Legislation he proposes is corporate friendly.

    Agribusiness is favored over small farmers. Free trade is unfair. Education plans want public schools privatized. Everything government does, business does better, he believes. Energy policy supports dangerous nuclear technology and drill baby drill.

    Environmental concerns are subordinated to profits. Healthcare proposals favor the best money can buy for those who can afford it. Homeland Security is about keeping America safe by militarizing it. War on terror strategy hypes fear to enlist support for Pentagon and homeland priorities.

    Immigration plans call for keeping out and removing millions not wanted. Tax policy makes ordinary people bear the burden for maximum business and super-rich benefits.

    Ryan’s position on these and other issues cynically supports the top 1% at the expense of everyone else. He represents Wisconsin’s 1st congressional district. Elected in November 1998, he’s in his 7th term in Congress.

    He chairs the House Budget Committee. He’s one of three Young Guns Program co-founders. It recruits hardline candidates for Congress. Romney chose Ryan as his running mate partner. They call themselves “America’s Comeback Team.”

    “Paul is a man of tremendous character,” Romney said. He’s “the right man to lead America back to prosperity and greatness.” He manipulated Tea Party anger into budget priorities.

    He’s wealthy and doesn’t care. He’s ranked America’s 124th richest House representative. He’s worth an estimated $3.2 million.

    He’s ideologically far-right. He’s an economic warrior representing wealth and power. He and Romney are two sides of the same coin. Democrats hardly differ. They’re in lockstep on issues mattering most.

    Ryan is more hard right than most ideological extremists. He favors two tax brackets – 25 and 10%. He wants corporate taxes cut from 35 – 25% or lower. Ideally he’d like them eliminated altogether along with others on capital gains, dividends, interest, and estates.

    He deplores social spending. He calls Social Security a Ponzi scheme. His job creation ideas assures destroying millions of them. He supports socialism for the rich and free market capitalism for working folks.

    No corporation left behind is policy. No social program too many destroyed permits it. Bankers and other other business predators love Ryan. He’s their kind of guy. Romney/Ryan is their ticket.

    They’re as comfortable with Obama. He gave them everything they want and then some. Everything isn’t enough. They want more. Stealing it from ordinary folks is how. Romney’s on board to do it. So is Ryan.



    ................................ http://clifylq.livejournal.com/101780.html


    Soetoro/Obama, being 'ineligible/unqualified' due to his lack of being 'natutal born' means that Obama will be 'usurping' the powers of the Office of President of the United States. It will result in every, yes every law that Soetoro/Obama signs, every appointment to an Ambassador or Judgeship, all will be invalid. Soetoro/Obama is setting himself up to be blackmailed, both internally and externally. http://www.rense.com/general84/reob.htm



    http://clifylq.blogspot.com/2012/07/not-native-born-anti-america-anti.html


    U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts, 53, administers his first presidential oath to the nation's first African-American president, Barack Obama, Tuesday at the U.S. Capitol. http://clifylq.livejournal.com/91776.html

    "I BARRY SOETERO do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States." So help me me. http://clifylq.livejournal.com/96778.html

    "I BARRY DUNHAM do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States." So help me me. http://clifylq.livejournal.com/99188.html

    "I BARRY OBAMA do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States." So help me me. http://clifylq.livejournal.com/61909.html

    "I BARACK DUNHAM do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States." So help me me. http://clifylq.livejournal.com/95202.html

    "I BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States." So help me me. http://clifylq.livejournal.com/99972.html



    http://supportbordercontrols.blogspot.com/2011/04/rothschilds-federal-reserve-bank.html


    THE ZIONIST ELEPHANT IN THE ROOM

    The David Icke Newsletter

    The political creed of Zionism has big ears and a long trunk and I think it’s time that was pointed out. It also stampedes through our lives at every level and that needs to be said, too.

    It has created a pincer-movement on the human mind by hijacking staggering amounts of political, corporate, banking and media power on one side and by using the fear of being called ‘anti-Semitic’ if you dare to state the bloody obvious.

    They have been able to do this by equating in public perception that Zionism = Jewish people. It does not. Zionism is a political creed introduced by the House of Rothschild to advance the goals of the Illuminati families that are largely controlled by the Rothschilds.

    When people think of Zionism they think of Jewish people. When they think of Israel they think of Jewish people. That’s understandable given the propaganda, but it is seriously misleading and those instant connections need to be broken if we are going to understand what’s going on here.

    Zionism means Rothschild just as Israel means Rothschild. When we see the extraordinary number of Zionists in key positions around the world we are looking not at ‘manipulating Jews’, but manipulating Zionists representing the interests and demands of the Rothschilds.

    Significant numbers of Jewish people are not Zionists and oppose that appalling creed while many Zionists are not Jewish. These include the Christian Zionists and Obama’s vice-president, Joe Biden, who told Israeli television ‘I’m a Zionist’. Here’s the clip if you can stand it … If, as Biden rightly says, you don’t have to be a Jew to be a Zionist, how can it be a racial rather than a political movement? It can’t. It’s just made to appear like that to manipulate public perception because opposing Zionism then becomes opposing Jewish people as a whole and the ‘you’re a racist’ card can be played over and over.

    Far from protecting and advancing the interests of the mass of Jewish people it has often been devastating for them and caused millions to be labelled unfairly by the actions of the Zionist elite. On the Jews Against Zionism website one feature highlights how Rothschild Zionism targeted Jews who had lived for generations in Palestine side-by-side with Arabs in peace and harmony:

    ‘The religious Jews who by virtue of their faith, clearly contradicted Zionist nationalism, and who had lived peacefully with their Arab neighbors for generations, became unwillingly identified with the Zionist cause and their struggle with the Arabs. http://rediscover911.com/zionist-elephant-in-the-room/



    In the wake of her attacks on Obama, Lady de Rothschild began publicly promoting the AE centrists movement--along with a host of other influential figures, including veteran Democratic Party pollster Doug Schoen. They saw AE as both a tool to remove Obama from the White House and to prevent the rise of a serious populists and nationalists challenger from the GOP ranks.

    As recently as Dec. 5, the billionaire aristocrat published a screed at the Huffington Post, hailing AE, actually suggesting the new party--representing what she called "the radical center"--would "take on all the vested interest and the extremists in the political parties, in the media, in the streets and in the guts of Washington."

    Now that the power elite have thrown AE to the side, a remarkable coalition including the Rothschild's, the "birther" movement led by former Israeli Orly Taitz, white separatists joined with hard-line Zionist, as well as many self-styled "patriots" and "conservatives" and others--are joining behind Romney--long seen as a "moderate" and "centrists" and even as a "liberal"--to put Obama out of the White House.

    Sadly, we are faced with a Hobson’s Choice in voting for President of the United States. We know that a Barack Obama elected for a second term will result in a Communist takeover of America. On the other hand, a Romney presidency would be equally disastrous. Whether we end up with Obama or Romney, the Illuminist goals I warn of in my new DVD, Die America Die! will be fully implemented.

    Republicans are being led to believe that a Mitt Romney as President will rescue us from evil. But if and when Mitt Romney assumes the mantle of President, the U.S.A. will be crowning with glory the Zionist Despot whom the Protocols of Zion heralded would bring all the nations together in a New World Order. On January 20, 2013, a lovely First Lady at his side, a Mormon pseudo-Jew, honored by millions as the King of the New Jerusalem, could be sworn into office. http://supportbordercontrols.blogspot.com/2012/08/satans-bitch-lady-lynn-de-rothschild.html#links





    clifylq
    http://clifylq.livejournal.com/
    http://clifylq.blogspot.com/
    http://www.myspace.com/434997466/blog
    http://supportbordercontrols.blogspot.com/
    http://clifylq.livejournal.com/calendar



    DO YA FEEL LUCKY PUNK? WELL.... DO YAH??
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m0MQY5_k3dY&feature=player_detailpage


    Check google pagerank for clifylq.livejournal.com

    Current Mood: angry
    Friday, August 24th, 2012
    1:27 pm
    SATAN'S BITCH LADY LYNN DE ROTHCHILD SUPPORTS SATAN'S USEFUL IDIOT MITT ROMNEY FOR PRESIDENT

    http://supportbordercontrols.blogspot.com/2012/06/president-mitt-romney-mormon-cultist.html


    ODD BEDFELLOWS UNITE VS OBAMMA


    Radical, centrists, conservatives, birthers, Zionist join to challenge president
    By Michael Collins Piper

    Barack Obama's fight to win reelection just got tougher. One of the biggest critics, one of the world's richest, most powerful women--Lady Lynn de Rothschild of New York and London--has not only endorsed Republican Mitt Romney, but she also pulled the plug on Americans Elect (AE), the proposed "centrists" third party of which she was one of the chief sponsors.

    Although the establishment media loudly noted in recent reports that AE folded up shop after having spent at least $35 million in Wall Street-financed organizing efforts, those reports did not mention that the primary reason AE collapsed was because Lady de Rothschild--the American born wife of Sir Evelyn Rothschild of the international banking dynasty and a key figure in the global elite in her own right--had decided Romney was acceptable as the GOP's nominee.

    While AE postured as a "grass-roots" effort to break partisan gridlock in America the truth is that Lady de Rothschild and a clique of elite figures from the Rothschild sphere of influence on Wall Street and in the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR)--of which she is a member--has set AE in motion in the first place.

    The intent of such a centrists party as the time was to defeat Obama and any potential GOP nominee, who did not meet the standards of the Rothschild family and its circles

    While Lady Rothschild had backed former Utah Gov. John Huntsman--a fervent internationalists--for the GOP nomination, his campaign was fading well before the first primary battle. As far back as Dec. 19--while both promoting Huntsman's aspirations and providing pivotal support for AE's centrists party efforts--Lady de Rothschild publicly told the popular news website the Huffington Post she would back Romney if Huntsman eventually withdrew..

    Not a month later, while holding a fundraiser for Huntsman at her apartment in Manhattan, she told The Washington Post she would support Romney if he did win the GOP nomination, which at that point , was still not assured.

    On Jan. 13, the Post--owned by investors such as Warren Buffett and the Graham family who have long been closely intertwined with the Rothschild's--reported Lady de Rothschild's endorsement of Romney, describing Lady de Rothschild as "a glamorous and die hard Hillary Rodham Clinton supporter whose antagonism toward Barack Obama has led her across the partisan aisle."

    Romney, in fact, prevailed over his challengers, and Lady de Rothschild and her allies decided to pull the plug on the centrists third party they were holding in reserve. Their big aim now is to deny Obama a second term, and Romney is clearly their chosen candidate to do it.




    Lady de Rothschild had supported Mrs. Clinton for the 2008 Democratic nomination. She then vocally endorsed Arizona Republican Sen. John McCain over Obama, who she said was too "ideological" (that is too liberal). This surprised many who perceived Obama as the Rothschild's' golden boy.

    As president, Obama confirmed Lady de Rothschild's worst suspicions. As early as Feb. 28, 2010,writing on the Internet's Daily Beast, Lady de Rothschild said that "After watching President Obama in office more than a year, it is clear to me that...we already knew what kind of president he would become...Perhaps the biggest fabrication of the Obama candidacy was his claim of being a centrists." Accusing Obama of being "beholden to the left," Lady de Rothschild said he had "misled" the American people during the 2008 campaign about his "real plans for America." She added that "his cynical use of centrists language as a tool to get elected does not change the fact of his true objectives."

    In the wake of her attacks on Obama, Lady de Rothschild began publicly promoting the AE centrists movement--along with a host of other influential figures, including veteran Democratic Party pollster Doug Schoen. They saw AE as both a tool to remove Obama from the White House and to prevent the rise of a serious populists and nationalists challenger from the GOP ranks.

    As recently as Dec. 5, the billionaire aristocrat published a screed at the Huffington Post, hailing AE, actually suggesting the new party--representing what she called "the radical center"--would "take on all the vested interest and the extremists in the political parties, in the media, in the streets and in the guts of Washington."



    Now that the power elite have thrown AE to the side, a remarkable coalition including the Rothschild's, the "birther" movement led by former Israeli Orly Taitz, white separatists joined with hard-line Zionist, as well as many self-styled "patriots" and "conservatives" and others--are joining behind Romney--long seen as a "moderate" and "centrists" and even as a "liberal"--to put Obama out of the White House.

    Sadly, we are faced with a Hobson’s Choice in voting for President of the United States. We know that a Barack Obama elected for a second term will result in a Communist takeover of America. On the other hand, a Romney presidency would be equally disastrous. Whether we end up with Obama or Romney, the Illuminist goals I warn of in my new DVD, Die America Die! will be fully implemented.

    Republicans are being led to believe that a Mitt Romney as President will rescue us from evil. But if and when Mitt Romney assumes the mantle of President, the U.S.A. will be crowning with glory the Zionist Despot whom the Protocols of Zion heralded would bring all the nations together in a New World Order. On January 20, 2013, a lovely First Lady at his side, a Mormon pseudo-Jew, honored by millions as the King of the New Jerusalem, could be sworn into office.

    Now that the power elite have thrown AE to the side, a remarkable coalition including the Rothschild's, the "birther" movement led by former Israeli Orly Taitz, white separatists joined with hard-line Zionist, as well as many self-styled "patriots" and "conservatives" and others--are joining behind Romney--long seen as a "moderate" and "centrists" and even as a "liberal"--to put Obama out of the White House.

    Sadly, we are faced with a Hobson’s Choice in voting for President of the United States. We know that a Barack Obama elected for a second term will result in a Communist takeover of America. On the other hand, a Romney presidency would be equally disastrous. Whether we end up with Obama or Romney, the Illuminist goals I warn of in my new DVD, Die America Die! will be fully implemented.

    Republicans are being led to believe that a Mitt Romney as President will rescue us from evil. But if and when Mitt Romney assumes the mantle of President, the U.S.A. will be crowning with glory the Zionist Despot whom the Protocols of Zion heralded would bring all the nations together in a New World Order. On January 20, 2013, a lovely First Lady at his side, a Mormon pseudo-Jew, honored by millions as the King of the New Jerusalem, could be sworn into office.




    THE TROJAN HORSE IS ROLLED INTO PLACE

    And then, the great Trojan Horse of Zionism will be rolled into position. From its bowels will come the black plague of Satanic Judaism: Mormons, Jews, and Masons, hand-in-hand, ready to fulfill their Master’s desires.

    The Oroboros serpent will have encircled the world and the star of Revelation will have taken his key to the bottomless pit and unleashed Abaddon and his minions to do their great, but terrible, work. The Zionist shill, Mitt Romney, on behalf of the Mormon daughter of the Jewish whore of Babylon, will sit on the throne of global power and rule from the White House in Washington, D.C. May God have mercy on us all http://www.texemarrs.com/052012/rabbis_love_mormons.htm



    ................................. http://clifylq.livejournal.com/107830.html





    ARIEL SHARON IN AN INTERVIEW WITH GENERAL OUZE MERHAM, 1956

    “I don't know something called International Principles. I vow that I'll burn every Palestinian child (that) will be born in this area. The Palestinian woman and child is more dangerous than the man, because the Palestinian child's existence infers that generations will go on, but the man causes limited danger. I vow that if I was just an Israeli civilian and I met a Palestinian I would burn him and I would make him suffer before killing him. With one hit I've killed 750 Palestinians (in Rafah in 1956). I wanted to encourage my soldiers by raping Arabic girls as the Palestinian women is a slave for Jews, and we do whatever we want to her and nobody tells us what we shall do but we tell others what they shall do." http://www.davidduke.com/general/ariel-sharon-the-terrorist-behind-the-9-11-attack_113.htm



    OBAMA SAY NO TO A PALESTINE MUSEUM FOR ISRAELI WAR CRIMES IN GAZA ONLY ISRAEL'S HOLOCOST ALLOWED http://clifylq.livejournal.com/107334.html

    On March 21, the London Independent's Donald Macintyre wrote: "Israelis (were) told to fight a 'holy war' in Gaza....a religious war" against Arabs, according to a soldier citing "the martial role of military rabbis during the operation." In rabbinate literature distributed to the troops, the message was: "We are the Jewish people, we came to this land by a miracle, God brought us back to this land, and now we need to fight to expel the Gentiles who are interfering with our conquest of this holy land." http://clifylq.livejournal.com/21325.html

    A MUSEUM FOR DOCUMENTING THE ISRAELI CRIMES IN GAZA
    02 April 2009

    On last 28 March 2009 I went to a charity event in solidarity with the Palestinian victims in Gaza and which had the purpose of raising money to finance a Physical Therapy Center in Gaza, according to Dr. Tariq Afifi, who headed the event. Dr. Hassan Najjar, the Chairman of the Association of Arab Doctors in Europe, said in his address, that “three months after the barbaric Israeli aggression on the Palestinian civilians in Gaza Strip, it is necessary to work together to establish a museum which documents all the past and current Israeli war crimes, genocide and the blockade in Gaza”. This bold and strong proposal, to open a museum documenting the Israeli war crimes proposed by Dr. Najjar was widely welcomed attendants to the event, among them many doctors, diplomats ambassadors and intellectuals and artists. http://www.tvnewslies.org/tvnl/index.php/news/human-rights/8144-a-museum-for-documenting-the-israeli-crimes-in-gaza.html




    SO..HOW'S THIS FELLA PAUL RYAN ON OUR ALLY ISRAEL?

    Pretty good, actually.

    From his official website:

    America has no better friend in the Middle East than the nation of Israel. Not only is Israel the region’s only fully functioning democracy, with a government based on popular consent and the rule of law, but it is also a valuable ally against Islamic extremism and terrorism.Our shared democratic values and national interests are supported by maintaining a close friendship with Israel. Americans also have a strong interest in Israel achieving a lasting peace with its neighbors – including the Palestinians.

    Reasonable people – including those who live in the Middle East – differ about how the conflict between Israel and Palestine can be resolved. However, I believe at least one thing is clear: we cannot advocate for a solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict that jeopardizes Israel’s safety or legitimizes terrorism. Hamas, which is one of the two major Palestinian political factions, is an Islamist terrorist group whose charter calls for Israel’s destruction, refuses to recognize Israel’s existence, and calls Osama Bin Laden a “martyr.”

    While I do not have a role in the diplomatic discussions over the resolution of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, America should not pressure Israel to agree to a peace deal that is unlikely to result in peace and security. Real peace will require Palestinians to recognize that Israel has a right to exist, even as it will require two states for the two peoples. Introduced by House Majority Leader Eric Cantor on May 13, 2011, H. Res. 268 reaffirms the United States’ commitment to a negotiated settlement of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict through direct negotiations. I co-sponsored this legislation, and it passed the House on July 7, 2011 by a vote of 407-13. I was also a cosponsor of H.R. 4133, the United States-Israel Enhanced Security Cooperation Act, also introduced by Majority Leader Eric Cantor, which passed the House on May 9, 2012 by a vote of 411-2. H.R. 4133 states that it is United States policy to reaffirm the commitment to Israel’s security as a state, provide Israel with the military capabilities to defend itself, expand military and civilian cooperation, assist in a negotiated settlement of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, and encourage Israel’s neighbors to recognize its right to exist.

    Ah, but there's more.

    He's been the co-sponsor of no less than 5 pro-Israel bills and resolutions, and puts the issue "Israel" under the category "Homeland Security" on hisCongressional website.

    Ryan visited Israel in 2005 with a delegation of newly elected Republican congressman, organized by the American Israel Education Foundation...and he's been a consistently pro-Israel vote and voice in the House.

    Not only that, but two sources tell me that they've heard Ryan being even more outspoken on the subject in private.

    If the execrable Phillip Mondoweis refers to him as 'an AIPAC tool' you know he's been doing something right.

    I'd say that Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan are pretty much on the same page when it comes to Israel, and their administration will be a welcome change....as in every other regard.



    http://clifylq.livejournal.com/106004.html


    ROMNEY’S INTELLIGENCE CHIEF AND CAMPAIGN ADVISER ­ Mitt Romney named Michael Chertoff, the Israeli agent who supervised the destruction of the crucial evidence of 9/11, co-chair of his counterterrorism and intelligence advisory committee in October 2011. The 9/11 cover-up continues.

    Mitt Romney attended the Mossad’s “Herzliya Conference on Israeli Security” in 2007. Romney and the current Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu worked together as consultants at the Boston Consulting Group early in their careers.

    Romney’s close relationship with Orit Gadiesh and Israeli military intelligence is the real reason he is the chosen candidate of the Zionist establishment. Romney is being supported by high-level Zionists, Israeli military intelligence, and their controlled media network. This relationship between the Israeli military and Mitt Romney, a presidential candidate, should be of great concern to all Americans because this is how the Israeli military plans to drag the United States into a war with Iran. http://clifylq.blogspot.com/2012/06/mitt-romney-is-agent-of-state-of-israel.html#comment-form





    clifylq


    http://clifylq.livejournal.com/
    http://clifylq.blogspot.com/
    http://www.myspace.com/434997466/blog
    http://supportbordercontrols.blogspot.com/
    http://clifylq.livejournal.com/calendar





    ROTHSCHILDS ILLUMINATI ULTIMATE GOAL:

    "Ultimately [their goal is] to bring in what people have termed the New World Order with a man who will hold the world's attention and carry the title 'The Antichrist.' That's the ultimate goal and I am not trying to wax religious on people but that's just the simple fact. When you get into deprogramming people you will see that a lot of the things they have been programmed to do tie in with a very sophisticated plan to unify the world under the reign of the Antichrist."

    "The whole long-range goal of this, and when I say long-range, it's not going to take them long to get us there at the rate they are going - the end goal of all of this is to eventually create an entire planet of mind controlled slaves that can be controlled by one super computer. They are manipulating our thoughts and our attitudes, and steering us, herding us (they consider us animals - the Illuminati consider themselves god, god men and us to be the animals) they are herding us in the direction they want to us to go." http://educate-yourself.org/nwo/illuminatiagendabestoverviewyet8jun02.shtml

    Check google pagerank for clifylq.livejournal.com

    Current Mood: angry
    Wednesday, August 1st, 2012
    11:40 am
    THE UN GUN BAN OBAMA WANTS TO SIGN "DOES BAN GUNS" IT UPHOLDS "STATES RIGHTS" NOT THE CITIZEN

    http://www.infowars.com/bombshell-un-gun-treaty-does-ban-guns/




    BOMBSHELL: LEAKED UN TREATY DOES BAN GUNS

    Treacherous wording upholds “States” gun rights but not individuals

    Aaron Dykes
    July 26, 2012

    The text of the anticipated and hotly-contested United Nations Arms Trade Treaty has been leaked, with the treaty itself set to be adopted and signed by member States as early as tomorrow, July 27. President Obama, today joining the chorus for gun control inside the United States in the wake of the Batman massacre, has previously indicated that he would sign the treaty, which would then have to be ratified by the Senate.

    Masked behind the language of promoting peace in an international world by preventing genocide, the UN has unleashed a great Trojan Horse that calls upon States to enact national legislation sufficient to meet the minimum goals outlined in this treaty– including gun registries, background checks, import/export controls and more for arms of all types, including small & conventional weapons. “Each State Party shall adopt national legislation or other appropriate national measures regulations and policies as may be necessary to implement the obligations of this Treaty,” the treaty text states in part.

    It makes specific note that the treaty places no limit upon greater gun control efforts within individual nations, and additionally places no expiration on the agreement. The scope of this language proves the analysis by Infowars (1, 2, 3, 4), writers at Forbes and many other publications that have been warning about this deceptive encroachment to be correct– there is an effort to disarm America underway.

    The devil, as usual, is in the details.

    Repeatedly, the treaty obligates States to establish “national control systems” to meet the particulars of the treaty. While the phrase “within national laws and regulations” appears to suggest that the 2nd Amendment would limit the implementation, properly read in the context of the wording and history itself, it really only invites new “regulations” where no “law” can be established.

    These international goals will undoubtedly pressure changes in the executive branches’ many policies, as we have already seen with the ATF, who are trying to outlaw most types of shotguns, and who separately placed greater reporting burdens on gun shops in the Southwest border states as a response to the Fast & Furious set-up by Eric Holder & co. to demonize and destroy gun ownership.

    The first “principle” outlined in the preamble reads: “1. The inherent rights of all States to individual or collective self-defense.” While the language of the treaty appears to recognize the legal right to keep such arms, the text actually recognizes the “inherent right of States” to “individual and collective” self-defense.

    This is NOT the same as individual persons’ inherent right to keep and bear arms as recognized and enumerated in the United States’ Bill of Rights. Instead, it puts the collectivist unit known as the State above the individual, in complete defiance of the system set-up in the United States. Individual defense for a State, for instance, refers to what is known on the international scene as “unilateral war,” while collective defense is recognize in such actions as that of NATO or other allied bodies. The States’ right to maintain internal order has also been recognized by the UN, but all other purposes for arms ownership are seen as illegitimate.

    It specifically recognizes [only] the “lawful private ownership and use of conventional arms exclusively for, inter alia, recreational, cultural, historical and sporting activities for States where such ownership and use are permitted or protected by law.” There’s been a great deal of rhetoric from gun grabbers over the years attempting to emphasize gun ownership for legitimate sporting uses, but the real purpose of arms ownership is a balance of power at the individual level in order to discourage tyranny at the State level. THAT is what the founding fathers intended, and that is the historical legacy Americans cherish.

    NO SPECIFIC PROTECTION for individual persons is contained in this dangerous treaty, though the same media who’ve been demonizing critics of the UN’s effort as delusional and paranoid will attempt to argue otherwise, clinging to deliberately inserted clauses herein that look like stop-guards and protections for gun rights, but properly read, do no such thing.

    While the UN advises States to keep within the scope of their own laws, the end-run assault against American’s 2nd Amendment is unmistakeable.

    The text was released two days ago, but has received almost no attention in the press. The International Association for the Protection of Civilian Arms Rights and The Examiner have analyzed the treaty, while pointing out that member states like France have “let slip that their ultimate goal is to regulate legitimately-owned ‘weapons.’”

    The United Nations has a sordid history of pursuing “general and complete disarmament,” and individual arms including legally owned arms have always been part of that focus. The United Nations treaty from 2001, known as the “SADC Protocol: Southern African Development Community” is, according to the UN’s own disarmament website, a “regional instrument that aims to curtail small arms ownership and illicit trafficking in Southern Africa along with the destruction of surplus state weapons. It is a far-reaching instrument, which goes beyond that of a politically binding declaration, providing the region with a legal basis upon which to deal with both the legal and the illicit trade in firearms.”

    As we have previously noted, U.S. troops have been trained to confiscate American guns, while the confiscation in New Orleans after Hurricane Katrina has already set the precedent. The deception over aiming for legal guns while pretending to target “illicit” weapons is continued here in this 2012 monster treaty.

    Below is the text in full, as it has been proposed and released. Any changes in the signed version will be noted when that time comes:

    ————————

    UNITED NATIONS ARMS TRADE TREATY TEXT


    PREAMBLE

    The States Parties to this Treaty.

    Guided by the purposes and principles of the Charter of the United Nations.

    Recalling that the charter of the UN promotes the establishment and maintenance of international peace and security with the least diversion for armaments of the world’s human and economic resources;

    Reaffirming the obligation of all State Parties to settle their international disputes by peaceful means in such a manner that international peace and security, and justice, are not endangered, in accordance with the Charter of the UN;

    Underlining the need to prevent, combat and eradicate the illicit trade of conventional arms and to prevent their diversion to illegal and unauthorized end use, such as terrorism and organized crime;

    Recognizing the legitimate political, security, economic and commercial rights and interests of States in the international trade of conventional arms;

    Reaffirming the sovereign right and responsibility of any State to regulate and control transfers of conventional arms that take place exclusively within its territory pursuant to its own legal or constitutional systems;

    Recognizing that development, human rights and peace and security, which are three pillars of the United Nations, are interlinked and mutually reinforcing.

    Recalling the United Nations Disarmament Commission guidelines on international arms transfers adopted by the General Assembly;

    Noting the contribution made by the 2001 UN Programme of Action to preventing combating and eradicating the illicit trade in small arms and light weapons in all its aspects, as well as the 2001 Protocol against the illicit manufacturing of and trafficking in Firearms, their parts and components and ammunition, supplementing the United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime;

    Recognizing the security, social, economic and humanitarian consequences of the illicit trade in and unregulated trade of conventional arms;

    Recognizing the challenges faced by victims of armed conflict and their need for adequate care, rehabilitation and social and economic inclusion;

    Bearing in mind that the women and children are particularly affected in situations of conflict and armed violence;

    Emphasizing that nothing in this treaty prevents States from exercising their right to adopt additional more rigorous measures consistent with the purpose of this Treaty;

    Recognizing the legitimate international trade and lawful private ownership and use of conventional arms exclusively for, inter alia, recreational, cultural, historical and sporting activities for States where such ownership and use are permitted or protected by law;

    Recognizing the active role that non-governmental organizations and civil society can play in furthering the goals and objectives of this Treaty; and

    16. Emphasizing that regulation of the international trade in conventional arms should not hamper international cooperation and legitimate trade in material, equipment and technology for peaceful purposes;

    Have agreed as follows:

    Principles

    Guided by the Purposes and Principles of the Charter of the United Nations, States Parties, In promoting the goals and objectives of this Treaty and implementing its provisions, shall act in accordance with the following principles:

    The inherent rights of all States to individual or collective self-defense;

    2. Settlement of individual disputes by peaceful means in such a manner that international peace and security, and justice, are not endangered;

    3. The rights and obligations of States under applicable international law, including international humanitarian law and international human rights law;

    4. The responsibility of all States, in accordance with their respective international obligations, to effectively regulate and control international transfer of conventional arms as well as the primary responsibility of all States to in establishing and implementing their respective national export control systems; and

    5. The necessity to implement this Treaty consistently and effectively and in a universal, objective and non-discriminatory manner.

    Article 1

    Goals and Objectives

    Cognizant of the need to prevent and combat the diversion of conventional arms into the illicit market or to unauthorized end users through the improvement of regulation on the international trade in conventional arms,

    The goals and objectives of this Treaty are:

    - For States Parties to establish the highest possible common standards for regulating or improving regulation of the international trade in conventional arms;

    - To prevent, combat and eradicate the illicit trade in conventional arms and their diversion to illegal and unauthorized end use;

    In order to:

    - Contribute to international and regional peace, security and stability;

    - Avoid that the international trade in conventional arms contributes to human suffering;

    - Promote cooperation, transparency and responsibility of States Parties in the trade in conventional arms, thus building confidence among States Parties,

    Article 2

    - A. Covered Items

    - 1. This Treaty shall apply to all conventional arms within the following categories:

    - a. Battle Tanks
    - b. Armored combat vehicles
    - c. Large-caliber Artillery systems
    - d. Combat aircraft
    - e. Attack helicopters
    - f. Warships
    - g. Missiles and missile launchers
    - h. Small Arms and Light Weapons

    - 2. Each State Party Shall establish and Maintain a national control system to regulate the export of munitions to the extent necessary to ensure that national controls on the export of the conventional arms covered by Paragraph a1 (a)-(h) are not circumvented by the export of munitions for those conventional arms.

    - 3. Each State Party shall establish and maintain a national control system to regulate the export of parts and components to the extent necessary to ensure that national controls on the export of the conventional arms covered by Paragraph A1 are not circumvented by the export of parts and components of those items.

    - 4. Each State Party shall establish or update, as appropriate, and maintain a national control list that shall include the items that fall within Paragraph 1 above, as defined on a national basis, based on relevant UN instruments at a minimum. Each State Party shall publish its control list to the extent permitted by national law.

    - B. Covered Activities

    - 1. This Treaty shall apply to those activities of the international trade in conventional arms covered in paragraph a1 above, and set out in Articles 6-10, hereafter referred to as “transfer.”

    - 2. This Treaty shall not apply to the international movement of conventional arms by a State Party or its agents for its armed forces or law enforcement authorities operating outside its national territories, provided they remain under the State Party’s ownership.

    Article 3

    Prohibited Transfers

    A State Party shall not authorize any transfer of conventional arms within the scope of this Treaty if the transfer would violate any obligation under any measure adopted by the United Nations Security Council acting under Chapter VII of the Charter of the United Nations, in particular arms embargoes.

    A State Party shall not authorize any transfer of conventional arms within the scope of this Treaty if the transfer would violate its relevant international obligations, under international agreements, to which it is a Party, in particular those relating to the international transfer of, or illicit trafficking in, conventional arms.

    A State Party shall not authorize a transfer of conventional arms within the scope of this Treaty for the purpose of facilitating the commission of genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes constituting grave breaches of the Geneva Conventions of 1949, or serious violations of Common Article 3 of the Geneva Convention of 1949.

    Article 4

    National Assessment

    Each State Party, in considering whether to authorize an export of conventional arms within the scope of this Treaty, shall, prior to authorization and through national control systems, make an assessment specific to the circumstances of the transfer based on the following criteria:

    Whether the proposed export of conventional arms would:

    Be used to commit or facilitate serious violations of international humanitarian law;

    Be used to commit or facilitate serious violations of international human rights law;

    Contribute to peace and security;

    Be used to commit or facilitate an act constituting an offense under international conventions and protocols relating to terrorism or transnational organized crime, to which the transferring State is a Party;

    In making the assessment, the transferring State Party shall apply the criteria set out in Paragraph 2 consistently and in an objective and non-discriminatory manner and in accordance with the principles set out in this Treaty, taking into account relevant factors, including information provided by the importing State.

    4. In assessing the risk pursuant to Paragraph 2, the transferring State Party may also take into consideration the establishment of risk mitigation measures including confidence-building measures and jointly developed programs by the exporting and importing State.

    5. If in the view of the authorizing State Party, this assessment, which would include any actions that may be taken in accordance with Paragraph 4, constitutes a substantial risk, the State Party shall not authorize the transfer.

    Article 5

    Additional Obligations

    Each State Party, when authorizing an export, shall consider taking feasible measures, including joint actions with other States involved in the transfer, to avoid the transferred arms:

    being diverted to the illicit market;

    be used to commit or facilitate gender-based violence or violence against children;

    become subject to corrupt practices; or


    adversely impact the development of the recipient State.

    Article 6

    General Implementation

    Each State Party shall implement this Treaty in a consistent, objective and non-discriminatory manner in accordance with the goals and objectives of this Treaty;

    The implementation of this Treaty shall not prejudice previous or future obligations undertaken with regards to international instruments, provided that those obligations are consistent with the goals and objectives of this Treaty. This Treaty shall not be cited as grounds for voiding contractual obligations under defense cooperation agreements concluded by States Parties to this Treaty.

    Each State Party shall take all appropriate legislative and administrative measures necessary to implement the provisions of this Treaty and designate competent national authorities in order to have an effective, transparent and predictable national control system regulating the transfer of conventional arms;

    Each State Party shall establish one or more national contact points to exchange information on matters related to the implementation of this Treaty. A State Party shall notify the Implementation Support Unit (See Article 13) of its national contact point(s) and keep the information updated.

    State Parties involved in a transfer of conventional arms shall, in a manner consistent with the principles of this Treaty, take appropriate measures to prevent diversion to the illicit market or to unauthorized end-users. All State Parties shall cooperate, as appropriate, with the exporting State to that end.

    If a diversion is detected the State or States Parties that made the decision shall verify the State or States Parties that could be affected by such diversion, in particulate those State Parties that are involved in the transfer, without delay.

    Each State Party shall take the appropriate measures, within national laws and regulations, to regulate transfers of conventional arms within the scope of the Treaty.

    Article 7

    Export

    Each State Party shall conduct risk assessments, as detailed in Articles 4 and 5, whether to grant authorizations for the transfer of conventional arms under the scope of this Treaty. State Parties shall apply Articles 3-5 consistently, taking into account all relevant information, including the nature and potential use of the items to be transferred and the verified end-user in the country of final destination.

    Each State Party shall take measures to ensure all authorizations for the export of conventional arms under the scope of the Treaty are detailed and issued prior to the export. Appropriate and relevant details of the authorization shall be made available to the importing, transit and transshipment State Parties, upon request.

    Article 8

    Import

    Importing State Parties shall take measures to ensure that appropriate and relevant information is provided, upon request, to the exporting State Party to assist the exporting State in its criteria assessment and to assist in verifying end users.

    State Parties shall put in place adequate measures that will allow them, where necessary, to monitor and control imports of items covered by the scope of the Treaty. State Parties shall also adopt appropriate measures to prevent the diversion of imported items to unauthorized end users or to the illicit market.

    Importing State Parties may request, where necessary, information from the exporting State Party concerning potential authorizations.

    Article 9

    Brokering

    Each State Party shall take the appropriate measures, within national laws and regulations, to control brokering taking place under its jurisdiction for conventional arms within the scope of this Treaty.

    Article 10


    Transit and Transshipment

    Each State Party shall adopt appropriate legislative, administrative or other measures to monitor and control, where necessary and feasible, conventional arms covered by this Treaty that transit or transship through territory under its jurisdiction, consistent with international law with due regard for innocent passage and transit passage;

    Importing and exporting States Parties shall cooperate and exchange information, where feasible and upon request, to transit and transshipment States Parties, in order to mitigate the risk of discretion;

    Article 11


    Reporting, Record Keeping and Transparency

    Each State Party shall maintain records in accordance with its national laws and regardless of the items referred to in Article 2, Paragraph A, with regards to conventional arms authorization or exports, and where feasible of those items transferred to their territory as the final destination, or that are authorized to transit or transship their territory, respectively.

    Such records may contain: quantity, value, model/type, authorized arms transfers, arms actually transferred, details of exporting State(s), recipient State(s), and end users as appropriate. Records shall be kept for a minimum of ten years, or consistent with other international commitments applicable to the State Party.

    States Parties may report to the Implementation Support Unit on an annual basis any actions taken to address the diversion of conventional arms to the illicit market.

    Each State Party shall, within the first year after entry into force of this Treaty for that State Party, provide an initial report to States Parties of relevant activities undertaken in order to implement this Treaty; including inter alia, domestic laws, regulations and administrative measures. States Parties shall report any new activities undertaken in order to implement this Treaty, when appropriate. Reports shall be distributed and made public by the Implementation Support Unit.

    Each State Party shall submit annually to the Implementation Support Unit by 31 May a report for the preceding calendar year concerning the authorization or actual transfer of items included in Article 2, Paragraph A1. Reports shall be distributed and made public by the Implementation Support Unit. The report submitted to the Implementation Support Unit may contain the same type of information submitted by the State Party to other relevant UN bodies, including the UN Register of Conventional Arms. Reports will be consistent with national security sensitivities or be commercially sensitive.

    ARTICLE 12

    ENFORCEMENT

    Each State Party shall adopt national legislation or other appropriate national measures regulations and policies as may be necessary to implement the obligations of this Treaty.

    ARTICLE 13


    IMPLEMENTATION SUPPORT UNIT

    This Treaty hereby establishes an Implementation Support Unit to assist States Parties in its implementation.


    The ISU shall consist of adequate staff, with necessary expertise to ensure the mandate entrusted to it can be effectively undertaken, with the core costs funded by States Parties.

    The implementation Support Unit, within a minimized structure and responsible to States Parties, shall undertake the responsibilities assigned to it in this Treaty, inter alia:


    Receive distribute reports, on behalf of the Depository, and make them publicly available;


    Maintain and Distribute regularly to States Parties the up-to-date list of national contact points;

    Facilitate the matching of offers and requests of assistance for Treaty implementation and promote international cooperation as requested;

    Facilitate the work of the Conference of States Parties, including making arrangements and providing the necessary service es for meetings under this Treaty; and

    Perform other duties as mandated by the Conference of States Parties.

    ARTICLE 14

    INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION

    States Parties shall designate national points of contact to act as a liaison on matters relating to the implementation of this Treaty.

    States Parties shall cooperate closely with one another, as appropriate, to enhance the implementation of this Treaty consistent with their respective security interests and legal and administrative systems.

    States Parties are encouraged to facilitate international cooperation, including the exchange of information on matters of mutual interest regarding the implementation and application of this Treaty in accordance with their national legal system. Such voluntary exchange of information may include, inter alia, information on national implementation measures as well as information on specific exporters, importers and brokers and on any prosecutions brought domestically, consistent with commercial and proprietary protections and domestic laws, regulations and respective legal and administrative systems.

    4. Each State Party is encouraged to maintain consultations and to share information, as appropriate, to support the implementation of this Treaty, including through their national contact points.

    5. States Parties shall cooperate to enforce the provisions of this Treaty and combat breaches of this Treaty, including sharing information regarding illicit activities and actors to assist national enforcement and to counter and prevent diversion. States Parties may also exchange information on lessons learned in relation to any aspect of this Treaty, to develop best practices to assist national implementation.

    Article 15

    International Assistance

    In fulfilling the obligation of this Treaty, States Parties may seek, inter alia, legal assistance, legislative assistance, technical assistance, institutional capacity building, material assistance or financial assistance. States, in a position to do so, shall provide such assistance. States Parties may contribute resources to a voluntary trust fund to assist requesting States Parties requiring such assistance to implement the Treaty.

    States Parties shall afford one another the widest measure of assistance, consistent with their respective legal and administrative systems, in investigations, prosecutions and judicial proceedings in relation to the violations of the national measures implemented to comply with obligations under of the provisions of this Treaty.

    Each State Party may offer or receive assistance, inter alia, through the United Nations international, regional, subregional or national organizations, non-governmental organizations or on a bi-lateral basis. Such assistance may include technical, financial, material and other forms of assistance as needed, upon request.

    Article 16

    Signature, Ratification, Acceptance, Approval or Accession

    This Treaty shall be open for signature on [date] at the United Nations Headquarters in New York by all States and regional integration organizations.

    This Treaty is subject to ratification, acceptance or approval of the Signatories.

    This Treaty shall be open for accession by any state and regional integration organization that has not signed the Treaty.

    4. The instruments of ratification, acceptance, approval or accession shall be deposited with the Depositary.

    5. The Depositary shall promptly inform all signatory and acceding States and regional integration organizations of the date of each signature, the date of deposit of each instrument of ratification, acceptance, approval or accession and the date of the entry into force of this Treaty, and of the receipt of notices.

    6. “Regional integration organization” shall mean an organization constituted by sovereign States of a given region, to which its Member States have transferred competence in respect of matters governed by this Treaty and which has been duly authorized, in accordance with its internal procedures, to sign, ratify, accept, approve or accede to it.

    7. At the time of its ratification, acceptance, approval or accession, a regional integration organization shall declare the extent of its competence with respect to matters governed by this Treaty. Such organizations shall also inform the Depositary of any relevant modifications in the extent of it competence.

    8. References to “State Parties” in the present Treaty shall apply to such organizations within the limits of their competence.

    Article 17

    Entry into Force

    This Treaty shall enter into force thirty days following the date of the deposit of the sixty-fifth instrument of ratification, acceptance or approval with the Depositary.

    For any State or regional integration organization that deposits its instruments of accession subsequent to the entry into force of the Treaty, the Treaty shall enter into force thirty days following the date of deposit of its instruments of accession.

    For the purpose of Paragraph 1 and 2 above, any instrument deposited by a regional integration organization shall not be counted as additional to those deposited by Member States of that organization.

    Article 18

    Withdrawal and Duration

    This Treaty shall be of unlimited duration.

    Each State Party shall, in exercising its national sovereignty, have the right to withdraw from this Convention. It shall give notice of such withdrawal to all other States Parties from this Convention. It shall give notice of such withdrawal to all other States Parties and to the Depositary. The instrument of withdrawal shall include a full explanation of the reasons motivating this withdrawal.

    A state shall not be discharged, by reason of its withdrawal, from the obligations arising from this treaty while it was a party to the Treaty, including any financial obligations, which may have accrued.

    Article 19

    Reservations

    Each State party, in exercising its national sovereignty, may formulate reservations unless the reservation is incompatible with the object and purpose of this Treaty.

    Article 20

    Amendments

    At any time after the Treaty’s entry into force, a State Party may propose an amendment to this Treaty.

    Any proposed amendment shall be submitted in writing to the Depository, which will then circulate the proposal to all States Parties, not less than 180 days before next meeting of the Conference of States Parties. The amendment shall be considered at the next Conference of States Parties if a majority of States Parties notify the Implementation Support Unit that they support further consideration of the proposal no later than 180 days after its circulation by the Depositary.

    Any amendment to this Treaty shall be adopted by consensus, or if consensus is not achieved, by two-thirds of the States Parties present and voting at the Conference of States Parties. The Depositary shall communicate any amendment to all States Parties.

    A proposed amendment adopted in accordance with Paragraph 3 of this Article shall enter into force for all States Parties to the Treaty that have accepted it, upon deposit with the Depositary. Thereafter, it shall enter into force for any remaining State Party on the date of deposit of its instrument of accession.

    Article 21

    Conference of States Parties

    The Conference of States Parties shall be convened not later than once a year following the entry into force of this Treaty. The Conference of States Parties shall adopt rules of procedure and rules governing its activities, including the frequency of meetings and rules concerning payment of expenses incurred in carrying out those activities.

    The Conference of States Parties shall:

    a. Consider and adopt recommendations regarding the implementation of this Treaty, in particular the promotion of its universality; TR

    b. Consider amendments to this Treaty;

    c. Consider and decide the work and budget of the Implementation Support Unit;

    d. Consider the establishment of any subsidiary bodies as may be necessary to improve the functioning of the Treaty;

    e. Perform any other function consistent with this Treaty.

    3. If circumstances merit, an exceptional meeting of the State Parties may be convened if required and resources allow.

    Article 22

    Dispute Settlement

    States Parties shall consult and cooperate with each other to settle any dispute that may arise with regard to the interpretation or application of this Treaty.

    States Parties shall settle any dispute between them concerning the interpretation or application of this Treat though negotiations or other peaceful means of the Parties mutual choice.

    States Parties may pursue, by mutual consent, third party arbitration to settle any dispute between them, regarding issues concerning the implementation of this Treaty.

    Article 23

    Relations with States not party to this TreatyStates Parties shall apply Articles 3-5 to all transfers of conventional arms within the scope of this Treaty to those not party to this Treaty.

    Article 24

    Relationship with other instruments

    States Parties shall have the right to enter into agreements on the trade in conventional arms with regards to the international trade in conventional arms, provided that those agreements are compatible with their obligations under this Treaty and do not undermine the objects and purposes of this Treaty.

    Article 25

    Depositary and Authentic Texts

    The Secretary-General of the United Nations is the Depositary of this Treaty.

    The original text of this Treaty, of which the Arabic, Chinese, English, Russian and Spanish texts are equally authentic.




    clifylq

    http://clifylq.livejournal.com/http://clifylq.blogspot.com/
    http://www.myspace.com/434997466/blog
    http://supportbordercontrols.blogspot.com/
    http://clifylq.livejournal.com/calendar



    Staged just in time for a vote on the UN small arms treaty
    http://www.libertygunrights.com/TreatySet10Pgs.pdf

    Check google pagerank for clifylq.livejournal.com

    Current Mood: angry
    Monday, July 30th, 2012
    8:19 pm
    HILLARY COW IS PORKED BY OBAMA FAST & FURIOUS FOR HELPING ARM MEXICAN DRUG LORDS WITH GUNS

    http://politicalvelcraft.org/2012/07/17/breaking-hillary-clinton-face-charges-behind-supplying-u-s-weapons-to-soros-mexican-drug-cartel-fast-furious/


    HILLORY CLINTON TO FACE CHARGES BEHIND SUPPLYING U.S. WEAPONS TO ROTHSCHILD/SOROS MEXICAN DRUG CARTEL - FAST AND FURIOUS!

    Last week it was reported that the State Department and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton were deeply involved in the scandal known as Operation Fast and Furious, orProject Gunwalker. Today, however, new evidence has surfaced indicating that not only was Hillary deeply involved in the scandal but was one of the masterminds behind it.



    Rothschild & Henchman
    http://clifylq.livejournal.com/112447.html


    N.M. Rothschild is considered by City of London sources to be one of the most influential parts of the British intelligence establishment, tied to the Thatcher “free market” wing of the Tory Party. Rothschild and Sons made huge sums managing for Thatcher the privatization of billions of dollars of British state industry holdings during the 1980s, and today, for John Major’s government. Rothschilds is also at the very heart of the world gold trade, being the bank at which twice daily the London Gold Fix is struck by a group of the five most influential gold trade banks. Gold constitutes a major part of the economy of drug dealings globally.

    N.M. Rothschild and Sons is also implicated in some of the filthiest drugs-for-weapons secret intelligence operations. Because it is connected to the highest levels of the British intelligence establishment, Rothschilds managed to evade any prominent mention of its complicity in one of the more sordid black covert intelligence networks, that of the Bank of Credit and Commerce International (BCCI). Rothschilds was at the center of the international web of money-laundering banks used during the 1970s and 1980s by Britain’s MI-6 and the networks of Col. Oliver North and George Bush, to finance such projects as the Nicaraguan Contras.

    According to investigative citizen journalist Mike Vanderboegh, sources close to the development of the Gunwalker scheme state that early on, Hillary and her trusted associated at State, Andrew J. Shapiro, devised at least part of the framework of what would later become Operation Fast and Furious. It was Shapiro who first described the details of the proposed scheme early in 2009 just after the Obama Administration took office.

    VANDERBOEGH RELATES THE FOLLOWING:

    My sources say that as Hillary’s trusted subordinate, it was Shapiro who first described to the Secretary of State the details of what has become the Gunwalker Scandal.

    The precise extent to which Hillary Clinton‘s knowledge of, and responsibility for, the Gunwalker Plot, lies within the memories of these two men, Shapiro and Steinberg, sources say.

    The sources also express dismay that the Issa committee is apparently restricting itself to the Department of Justice and not venturing further afield. The House Foreign Affairs Committee, they say, needs to summon these two men and their subordinates — especially at the Mexico Desk at State — and question them under oath as to what Hillary Clinton knew about the origins of the Gunwalker Scandal and when she knew it.
    There is one other thing those sources agree upon. The CIA, they say, knows “everything” about the “Mexican hat dance” that became the Gunwalker Scandal.

    The ‘Steinberg’ mentioned in the quote above is Hillary Clinton’s former Deputy Secretary of State, who was appointed directly by Barack Obama and was considered from the start to be an ‘Obama man’ whose objective was to carry out the wishes of the President in the State Department.


    BILLARY DID WACO TOO!
    http://clifylq.livejournal.com/23815.html
    http://clifylq.livejournal.com/115628.html


    HILLARY HAD SAID OF STEINBERG,

    Clinton said Steinberg had been a “fixture” at meetings with the National Security Council (NSC) and frequently represented the US State Department at the White House.

    That statement is key. Hillary herself stayed out of all meetings dealing with strategy concerning the euphemism the Administration used to designate Gunwalker, ‘strategy meetings on Mexico and the problem of drug and gun trafficking.’ Hillary’s absence would give the impression that she had no connection to the scheme while making sure that her views were represented by Steinberg and Shapiro, both of whom were fully complicit with the details that developed concerning how to pad statistics on U.S. guns in Mexico.

    According to sources, Hillary was obsessed with gun statistics that would prove that ’90% of the firearms used by Mexican criminals come from the United States.’ As previouly reported, that meme, repeated incessantly by Democratic Senators, Barack Obama, certan members of the ATF, Janet Napolitano, and Hillary Clinton was patently and blatantly false. The fact that they all knew it was false is borne out by the lengths to which each of the above named co-conspirators went to attempt to ‘prove’ that the 90% figure was true.

    AGAIN, VANDERBOEGH RELATES THE FOLLOWING:

    My sources say that this battle of the “statistics” was taken very seriously by all players — the White House, State and Justice. Yet, WHY was this game of statistics so important to the players? If some weapons from the American civilian market were making it to Mexico into the hand of drug gang killers that was bad enough. What was the importance of insisting that it was 90 percent, 80 percent, or finally 70 percent? Would such statistics make any difference to the law enforcement tactics necessary to curtail them? No.

    MEXICAN DRUG BEHEADINGS

    This statistics mania is similar to the focus on “body counts” in Vietnam. Yet if Vietnam body counts were supposed to be a measure of how we were winning that war, the focus on the 90 percent meme was certainly not designed to be a measure of how we were winning the war against arming the cartels, but rather by what overwhelming standard we were LOSING. Why?

    Recall what the whistleblower ATF agents told us right after this scandal broke in the wake of the death of Brian Terry: “ATF source confirms ‘walking’ guns to Mexico to ‘pad’ statistics.”

    Thus, from the beginning the scheme was to pad statistics on U.S. guns in Mexico in order to be in a strengthened position to call for gun bans and strict gun control at a time when it was politically unpopular. Further, the scheme would involve a made-up statistic, out of thin air–90%–which then had to be proved by using civilian gun retailers along the southern border as unsuspecting pawns to walk U.S. guns into Mexico by ATF agents, straw purchasers, and others with connections to Mexican drug cartels.


    http://www.libertygunrights.com/TreatySet10Pgs.pdf


    ATF gunwalking scandalFrom Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia (Redirected from Operation Fast and Furious)
    Jump to: navigation, search

    The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) ran a series of "gunwalking" sting operations[2][3] between 2006[4] and 2011.[2][5] This was done under the umbrella of Project Gunrunner, a project intended to stem the flow of firearms into Mexico by interdicting straw purchasers and gun traffickers within the United States.[6] "Gunwalking" or "letting guns walk" was a tactic whereby the ATF allowed guns to be bought by suspected straw purchasers, who were believed to be working on behalf of Mexican drug cartel arms traffickers ("gunrunners").[7]

    The stated goal of allowing these purchases was to continue to track the firearms as they were transferred to higher-level traffickers and key figures in Mexican cartels, with the expectation that this would lead to their arrests and the dismantling of the cartels.[8][9] The tactic was questioned during the operations by a number of people, including ATF field agents and cooperating licensed gun dealers.[10][11][12][13][14] Operation Fast and Furious, by far the largest "gunwalking" probe, monitored the sale of over 2,000 firearms, of which nearly 700 were recovered as of October 20, 2011 (2011 -10-20)[update].[15] A number of straw purchasers have been arrested and indicted; however, as of October 2011, none of the targeted high-level cartel figures have been arrested.[7]

    According to a Mexican legislator, firearms trafficked by smugglers under the watch of the ATF have been found at crime scenes in Mexico, including scenes involving the death or wounding of at least 150 Mexican civilians — a statistic "which could not be independently confirmed" and the official did not say how it was calculated.[16] Guns tracked by the ATF have been found at crime scenes on both sides of the Mexico–United States border, and the scene of the death of at least one U.S. federal agent, Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry. The "gunwalking" operations became public in the aftermath of Terry's murder.[2] Dissenting ATF agents came forward to Congress in response.[17][18] As investigations have continued, the operations have become increasingly controversial in both countries, and diplomatic relations have been damaged as a result.[2]

    In June 2012, an investigation by Fortune magazine concluded that the ATF never intentionally allowed guns to fall into the hands of Mexican drug cartels.[19] Agents interviewed during the six-month Fortune magazine investigation repeatedly asserted that only one isolated incident of "gunwalking" ever occurred, and was performed independently by ATF Agent John Dodson (who later appeared on CBS News as a whistleblower to denounce the gunwalking scandal) as part of an unauthorized solo action outside of the larger Fast and Furious operation.

    BACKGROUND

    ATF "gunwalking" operations were, in part, a response to longstanding criticism of the bureau for focusing on relatively minor gun violations while failing to target high-level gun smuggling figures.[20] U.S. firearms laws currently govern the possession and transfer of firearms and provide penalties for the violation of such laws. “Gun trafficking”, although not defined by statute, essentially includes the movement or diversion of firearms from legal to illegal markets.[21]:Summary A 2009 GAO report on efforts to combat arms trafficking to Mexico notes that straw purchasing is not in itself illegal, although it is illegal to provide false information in connection with a purchase.[22] Four federal statutes govern U.S. commerce of firearms domestically and internationally. Many states supplement these federal statutes and have firearms laws of their own that are stricter. For example, some states require permits to obtain firearms and impose a waiting period for firearm transfers. Domestic commerce and importations into the United States are generally regulated under the National Firearms Act of 1934 (NFA) and the Gun Control Act of 1968 (GCA). The exportation of firearms from the United States is regulated by the Arms Export Control Act of 1976 and, to a lesser extent, the Export Administration Regulations (EAR).[21]:3 Defendants are often prosecuted and convicted under provisions of statutes such as the GCA that make it unlawful for certain persons to be in possession of firearms, govern the transaction process of obtaining firearms (e.g., straw purchases), and contain penalties for the use of a firearm in a crime of violence or a drug trafficking crime, or penalties for knowingly or fraudulently smuggling goods that would be contrary to U.S. law and regulation.[21]:18

    In a 2012 case in San Juan, Texas, under existing 1968 Gun Control Act provisions on straw purchasing (Title 18 United States Code, Section 924(a)(1)(A)), straw purchaser Taisa Garcia received 33 months and buyer Marco Villalobos received 46 months, plus two years supervision after release.[23] In another Texas gun trafficking case, Oscar Bravo Hernandez received a sentence of 84 months for buying and sending to Mexico at least 55 firearms from a ring of nine straw purchasers who received sentences from 51 months for the most involved down to three years probation for the least involved.[24]

    According to twenty-year ATF veteran Jay Wachtel, letting guns "walk" has been a practice done in a controlled manner that involved surveillance and eventual seizure of the weapons. "The idea was that you would follow it long enough until you were sure you had enough probable cause" to initiate an arrest, Wachtel said.[1] According to ATF field agents involved in Operation Fast and Furious, a part of Project Gunrunner, "ATF agents were trained to interdict guns and prevent criminals from obtaining them" and not to allow guns to walk and then disappear.[11] ATF agents assigned to Phoenix from other districts to work on Fast and Furious were critical of the operation.

    2009–2011: Operation Fast and FuriousOn October 26, 2009, a teleconference was held at the Department of Justice in Washington, D.C. to discuss U.S. strategy for combating Mexican drug cartels. Participating in the meeting were Deputy Attorney General David W. Ogden, Assistant Attorney General Lanny A. Breuer, ATF Director Kenneth E. Melson, Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) Administrator Michele Leonhart, Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation Robert Mueller and the top federal prosecutors in the Southwestern border states. They decided on a strategy to identify and eliminate entire arms trafficking networks rather than low-level buyers.[3][33][34] Those at the meeting did not suggest using the "gunwalking" tactic, but ATF supervisors would soon use it in an attempt to achieve the desired goals.[35] The effort, beginning in November, would come to be called Operation Fast and Furious for the successful film franchise, because some of the suspects under investigation operated out of an auto repair store and street raced.[3]

    The strategy of targeting high-level individuals, which was already ATF policy, would be implemented by Bill Newell, special agent in charge of ATF's Phoenix field division. In order to accomplish it, the office decided to monitor suspicious firearms purchases which federal prosecutors had determined lacked sufficient evidence for prosecution, as laid out in a January 2010 briefing paper. This was said to be allowed under ATF regulations and given legal backing by U.S. Attorney for the District of Arizona Dennis K. Burke. It was additionally approved and funded by a Justice Department task force.[3] However, long-standing DOJ and ATF policy has required arms shipments to be intercepted.[4][5]

    In November 2009, the Phoenix office's Group VII, which would be the lead investigative group in Fast and Furious, began to follow a prolific gun trafficker. He had bought 34 firearms in 24 days, and he and his associates bought 212 more in the next month. The case soon grew to over two dozen straw purchasers, the most prolific of which would ultimately buy more than 600 weapons.[3][5][36]

    The tactic of letting guns walk, rather than interdicting them and arresting the buyers, led to controversy within the ATF.[5][37] As the case continued, several members of Group VII, including John Dodson and Olindo Casa, became increasingly upset at the tactic of allowing guns to walk. Their standard Project Gunrunner training was to follow the straw purchasers to the hand-off to the cartel buyers, then arrest both parties and seize the guns. But according to Dodson, they watched guns being bought illegally and stashed on a daily basis, while their supervisors, including David Voth and Hope MacAllister, prevented the agents from intervening.[3]

    However, other accounts of the operation insist that ATF agents were prevented from intervening not by ATF officials, but rather by federal prosecutors with the Attorney General's office, who were unsure of whether the agents had sufficient evidence to arrest suspected straw-buyers.[19] According to some reports, many agents insisted they were prevented from making arrests because prosecutors were unwilling to engage in what could become a potentially contentious political battle over Second Amendment rights during an election year, particularly given the difficult nature of prosecuting straw buyers, and the weak penalties associated with it, even if successful.[19] Instead, prosecutors instructed ATF agents not to make arrests, but rather continue collecting evidence in order to build a stronger case. One tactic proposed for doing so was a wiretap of suspected straw-buyers, in an attempt to link the suspects to criminal activities taking place on the Mexican side of the border.[19]

    By June 2010, suspects had purchased 1,608 firearms at a cost of over US$1 million at Phoenix-area gun shops. At that time, the ATF was also aware of 179 of those weapons being found at crime scenes in Mexico, and 130 in the United States.[8] As guns traced to Fast and Furious began turning up at violent crime scenes in Mexico, ATF agents stationed there also voiced opposition.[3]

    On the evening of December 14, 2010, U.S. Border Patrol agent Brian Terry and others were patrolling Peck Canyon, Santa Cruz County, Arizona, 11 miles from the Mexican border. The group came across five suspected illegal immigrants. When they fired non-lethal beanbag guns, the suspects responded with their own weapons, leading to a firefight. Terry was shot and killed; four of the suspects were arrested and two AK-pattern rifles were found nearby. The rifles were traced to Fast and Furious within hours of the shooting, but the bullet that killed Terry was too badly damaged to be conclusively linked to either gun.[3]

    After hearing of the incident, Dodson reached out to ATF headquarters, ATF's chief counsel, the ATF ethics section and the Justice Department's Office of the Inspector General, none of whom immediately responded. He and other agents then contacted Senator Chuck Grassley of Iowa (R–IA), ranking member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, who would become a major figure in the investigation of "gunwalking." At the same time, information began leaking to various bloggers and Web sites.[3]

    On January 25, 2011, Burke announced the first details of the case to become officially public, marking the end of Operation Fast and Furious. At a news conference in Phoenix, he reported a 53-count indictment of 20 suspects for buying hundreds of guns intended for illegal export between September 2009 and December 2010. Newell, who was at the conference, called Fast and Furious a "phenomenal case," while denying that guns had been deliberately allowed to walk into Mexico.[3][12]

    Altogether, 2,020 firearms were bought by straw purchasers during Fast and Furious.[3] These included AK-47 variants, Barrett .50 caliber sniper rifles, .38 caliber revolvers, and FN Five-sevens.[38] As of October 20, 2011 (2011 -10-20)[update], 389 had been recovered in the US and 276 had been recovered in Mexico. The rest remained on the streets, unaccounted for.[15] Most of the guns went to the Sinaloa Cartel, while others made their way to El Teo and La Familia.[2][28]

    Although most weapons were purchased by suspects under investigation by the program, there have been reports of at least one instance of ATF agents being directly involved in the transfer of weapons. On April 13th, 2010, ATF Agent John Dodson, with assistance from Agents Casa and Alt, directed a cooperating straw purchaser to give three guns to Isaiah Fernandez, a suspected gun trafficker, and had taped the conversations without prosecutor approval.[19] After being instructed by his superiors to obtain approval from prosecutors (albeit retroactively), Dodson's proposal was later rejected by his immediate superior David Voth, although he later received permission from Voth's supervisor after submitting a written proposal for the program. On June 1st, 2010, Dodson used $2,500 of ATF funds to purchase six AK Draco pistols from local gun dealers, which he then gave to Mr. Fernandez, who reimbursed him for the expense of the guns, plus $700 for his assistance.[19] Two days later, Agent Dodson went on a scheduled vacation without interdicting the weapons. As a result, the weapons were never recovered, no arrests were ever made, and the case was closed without charges being filed.

    Aftermath and reaction[edit] Fate of walked gunsSince the end of Operation Fast and Furious, related firearms have continued to be discovered in criminal hands. As reported in September 2011, the Mexican government stated that an undisclosed number of guns found at about 170 crime scenes were linked to Fast and Furious.[39] U.S. Representative Darrell Issa (R–CA–49) estimated that more than 200 Mexicans were killed by guns linked to the operation.[40] Reflecting on the operation, Attorney General Eric Holder said that the United States government is "...losing the battle to stop the flow of illegal guns to Mexico,"[41] and that the effects of Operation Fast and Furious will most likely continue to be felt for years, as more walked guns appear at Mexican crime scenes.[42]

    In April 2011, a large cache of weapons, 40 traced to Fast and Furious but also including military-grade weapons difficult to obtain legally in the US such as an anti-aircraft machine gun and grenade launcher, was found in the home of Jose Antonio Torres Marrufo, a prominent Sinaloa Cartel member, in Ciudad Juárez, Mexico. Torres Marrufo was indicted, but evaded law enforcement for a brief time.[43][44] Finally, on February 4, 2012 Marrufo was arrested by the Mexican Police.[45]

    On May 29, 2011 four Mexican Federal Police helicopters attacked a cartel compound, where they were met with heavy fire, including from a .50 caliber rifle. According to a report from the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, this rifle is likely linked to Fast and Furious.[2]

    There have been questions raised over a possible connection between Fast and Furious and the death of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agent Jaime Zapata on February 15, 2011.[46][47] The gun used to kill Zapata was purchased by Otilio Osorio in the Dallas/Fort Worth Metroplex, Texas[48] (outside the area of responsibility for the ATF Phoenix field division[49] which conducted Fast and Furious), and then smuggled into Mexico. Congressional investigators have stated that Osorio was known by the ATF to be a straw purchaser months before he purchased the gun used to kill Zapata, leading them to question ATF surveillance tactics[48] and to suspect a Texas-based operation similar to Fast and Furious.[50] In addition to Otilio Osorio, a Texas-based drug and gun trafficker, Manuel Barba, was involved trafficking another of the guns recovered in the Zapata shooting. The timeline of this case, called "Baytown Crew", shows guns were allowed to walk during surveillance that began June 7, 2010. On August 20, 2010 Barba received a rifle later recovered in the Zapata ambush and sent it with nine others to Mexico. The warrant for Barba's arrest was issued February 14, 2011, the day before Zapata was shot.[51] On January 30, 2012, Barba, who claimed to be working with Los Zetas in illegally exporting at least 44 weapons purchased through straw buyers, was sentenced to 100 months in prison.[52]

    [edit] Investigations and falloutIn the Congress, Representative Darrell Issa (R–CA–49), chairman of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, and Senator Chuck Grassley (R–IA), ranking member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, have been investigating "gunwalking" operations.[53] On January 27, 2011, Grassley wrote a letter to ATF Acting Director Kenneth E. Melson requesting information about the ATF-sanctioned sale of hundreds of firearms to straw purchasers. The letter mentioned a number of allegations that walked guns were used in the fight that killed Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry.[54] A second letter from Grassley on January 31 accused the ATF of targeting whistleblowers.[55]

    On February 4, Assistant Attorney General Ronald Weich wrote a letter to Grassley in response to statements by the U.S. Attorney for the District of Arizona, Dennis K. Burke and others. Weich said claims "...that (the) ATF ‘sanctioned’ or otherwise knowingly allowed the sale of assault weapons to a straw purchaser who then transported them to Mexico [are] false. ATF makes every effort to interdict weapons that have been purchased illegally and prevent their transportation to Mexico.”[56][57] Also in February, Attorney General Eric Holder requested that the Department of Justice's Inspector General begin an investigation of Fast and Furious.[58]

    On March 23, President Barack Obama appeared on Univision and spoke about the "gunwalking" controversy. He said that neither he nor Attorney General Holder authorized Fast and Furious. He also stated, "There may be a situation here in which a serious mistake was made, and if that's the case then we'll find out and we'll hold somebody accountable."[59]

    On May 3, Attorney General Holder testified to the House Judiciary Committee that he did not know who approved Fast and Furious, but that it was being investigated. He also stated that he "probably heard about Fast and Furious for the first time over the last few weeks," a claim which would later be questioned[60][61][62] as explained below.

    In June, ATF Agent Vince Cefalu, who helped to publicize Fast and Furious, was served with termination papers, in a move by the agency he described as politically motivated retaliation. He had been at odds with ATF management since he filed a complaint over tactics in an unrelated case in 2005. The ATF denied that the firing was retaliation, and Cefalu's termination letter noted that he leaked documents to the Internet and showed a "lack of candor" in other operations.[63]

    On June 14, 2011, a preliminary joint staff report was released by Representative Issa and Senator Grassley.[11] Among the findings: agents were told to stand down rather than interdict weapons, they complained about the strategy and were ignored, and Fast and Furious led to increased violence and death in Mexico.[64] Agents were panicked, certain that "someone was going to die."[65]

    Representative Issa continued to hold hearings in June and July where ATF officials based in Phoenix and Mexico, and at headquarters in Washington, testified before the committee.[66] ATF agent John Dodson stated that he and other agents were ordered to observe the activities of gun smugglers but not to intervene. He testified:[67][68]

    Over the course of the next 10 months that I was involved in this operation, we monitored as they purchased hand guns, AK-47 variants, and .50 caliber rifles almost daily. Rather than conduct any enforcement actions, we took notes, we recorded observations, we tracked movements of these individuals for a short time after their purchases, but nothing more. Knowing all the while, just days after these purchases, the guns that we saw these individuals buy would begin turning up at crime scenes in the United States and Mexico, we still did nothing. ...
    I cannot begin to think of how the risk of letting guns fall into the hands of known criminals could possibly advance any legitimate law enforcement interest.
    A second joint staff report was released by the Republicans on July 26.[38]

    In August, three important Fast and Furious supervisors were transferred to new management positions at ATF headquarters in Washington: William Newell and David Voth, field supervisors who oversaw the program from Phoenix, and William McMahon, an ATF deputy director of operations. The transfers were initially reported as promotions by the Los Angeles Times, but the ATF stated that they did not receive raises or take on greater responsibilities.[53][69] In late August, it was announced that ATF Director Melson had been reassigned to the Justice Department, and U.S. Attorney Burke announced his resignation after being questioned by Congressional investigators earlier that month.[70]

    In October, documents showing that Attorney General Holder's office had been sent briefings on Fast and Furious as early as July 2010, prompted questions about his May statement that he wasn't sure of the exact date, but had known about it for only a few weeks. The briefings were from the National Drug Intelligence Center and Assistant Attorney General Lanny Breuer. The Justice Department said that those briefings were about a different case started before Holder became Attorney General, and that while he had known about Fast and Furious, he didn't know the details of the tactics being used.[62]

    On November 8, Holder stated for the first time in Congressional testimony that "gunwalking" was used in Fast and Furious. He remarked that the tactic is unacceptable, and that the operation was "flawed in its concept and flawed in its execution." He further stated that his office had inaccurately described the program in previous letters sent to Congress, but that this was unintentional. Reiterating previous testimony, he said that he and other top officials had been unaware that the "gunwalking" tactic was being used. Holder stated that his staff had not showed him memos about the program, noting, "There is nothing in any of those memos that indicates any of those inappropriate tactics that are of concern. Those things were not brought to my attention, and my staff, I think, made the correct decision in that regard."[60][71][72]

    In December, documents showed that some ATF agents discussed using Fast and Furious to provide anecdotal cases to support controversial new rules about gun sales. The regulation, called Demand Letter 3, would require 8,500 firearms dealers in Arizona, California, New Mexico and Texas that "have a significant number of crime guns traced back to them from Mexico" to report multiple rifle sales.[73]

    Investigations by Congress and the DOJ Inspector General continued into 2012. In January, Patrick Cunningham, who was the criminal division chief at the Phoenix office of the U.S. Attorney's Office for the District of Arizona and has since resigned, asserted his innocence and his constitutional right against self-incrimination to avoid testifying.[74] Cunningham worked directly under Burke during Fast and Furious. He was subpoenaed because of the role he might have played in the operation, and in the letter sent from the DOJ to Senator Grassley in February 2011 that claimed the ATF did not allow weapons to be trafficked to Mexico.[75]

    On January 31, Democrats on the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee released a report titled, "Fatally Flawed: Five Years of Gunwalking in Arizona".[32] The report concluded that there was no evidence of involvement by high-ranking appointees at the Justice Department in "gunwalking." Rather, Operation Fast and Furious was just one of four such operations conducted over five years during the Bush and Obama administrations, and was only "the latest in a series of fatally flawed operations run by ATF agents in Phoenix and the Arizona U.S. Attorney's Office."[76]

    On June 7, 2012, under the threat of being held in contempt of Congress for not turning over additional requested documents, Attorney General Holder appeared at his seventh Congressional hearing, where he continued to deny knowledge of "gunwalking" by high-level officials. By then, the Justice Department had turned over more than 7,000 pages of documents.[77] On June 12, 2012, Eric Holder responded to Sen. Cornyn that his predecessor Michael Mukasey had been briefed on gunwalking in Wide Receiver and did nothing to stop it; on June 18, DOJ clarified to Sen. Grassley that Mukasey had been briefed on the later Hernandez case, not on Wide Receiver, as previously explained by DOJ in a March 16 letter to Rep. Issa.[31]

    On June 20, the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee voted along party lines to recommend that Holder be held in contempt. At issue were 1,300 pages of documents that had not been turned over to Congress by the DOJ. Earlier that day, President Obama had invoked executive privilege over those documents, marking the first time the privilege has been asserted during his presidency.[78][79] Mr. Issa contends that the Obama executive privilege claim is a cover-up or an obstruction to the congressional probe. Mr. Issa said the department has identified "140,000 pages of documents and communications responsive to the committee's subpoena."[80]

    On Thursday, June 28, 2012, Holder became the first sitting member of the Cabinet of the United States to be held in criminal contempt of Congress by the House of Representatives for refusing to disclose internal Justice Department documents in response to a subpoena. The vote was 255-67 in favor, with 17 Democrats voting yes and a large number of Democrats walking off the floor in protest and refusing to vote. A civil contempt measure was also voted on and passed, 258-95. The civil contempt vote allows the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform to go to court with a civil lawsuit to look into the US Justice Department's refusal to turn over some of the subpoenaed documents and to test Obama's assertion of executive privilege. Holder dismissed the votes as "the regrettable culmination of what became a misguided — and politically motivated — investigation during an election year," and the White House called it "political theater rather than legitimate congressional oversight."[81][82]

    The National Rifle Association pressured members of both parties to vote in favor of contempt, with the vote counting toward the organization's annual scorecard. The 17 Democrats who voted for criminal contempt, which included the most endangered incumbents in conservative districts, had all previously received an "A" grade from the NRA and risked losing the endorsement of the organization when seeking re-election in November. All but two of the Democrats who voted for the contempt charge have received campaign contributions from the NRA during the past two election cycles.[83] In a June 20, 2012 letter to committee chairmen Issa and Cummings,[84] the NRA stated their rationale for supporting the contempt resolution by saying, "The reason we support the contempt resolution is the same reason we first called for Attorney General Holder's resignation more than a year ago: the Department's obstruction of congressional oversight of a program that cost lives in support of an anti-gun agenda." Representative Issa, the NRA and other conservatives have asserted that Operation Fast and Furious began as part of an anti-gun agenda to promote additional gun laws. This tenuous assertion is undermined because documents that refer to changing gun regulations come far after the inception of Fast and Furious.[85][86][87][88]

    On July 9, 2012, an indictment charging five men, including four fugitives, in the death of U.S. Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry was unsealed. The FBI offered a reward of $250,000 per fugitive for information leading to their arrests. The indictment, originally handed up on November 7, 2011, charges Manuel Osorio-Arellanes, Jesus Rosario Favela-Astorga, Ivan Soto-Barraza, Heraclio Osorio-Arellanes and Lionel Portillo-Meza with first-degree murder, second-degree murder, and other crimes. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Fast_and_Furious





    clifylq

    http://clifylq.livejournal.com/
    http://clifylq.blogspot.com/
    http://www.myspace.com/434997466/blog
    http://supportbordercontrols.blogspot.com/
    http://clifylq.livejournal.com/calendar



    http://clifylq.livejournal.com/102378.html


    THE SECOND AMENDMENT OF THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION: "A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed." http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/article.asp?ID=37

    OBAMA AND HIS ZIONIST NAZIS WANT TO DESTROY AMERICA'S SECOND AMENDMENT THE RIGHT TO OWN AND BEAR ARMS. WHY? SO THAT THE NWO CAN FINALLY DESTROY WE AMERICANS WITHOUT FEAR THAT WE MIGHT SHOOT THE BASTARDS BACK TO HELL WHERE ZIONIST BACKED ISRAEL COMES FROM.

    Obama is working closely with the Soros-backed Australian Rebecca Peters. She wants to introduce a gun ban into the USA as she did in Australia.

    Peters is the architect of the gun confiscation of Australians. It's now a nation suffering consecutive rogue governments micro managing Aussie's lives.

    http://www.congress.org/congressorg/webreturn/?url=http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c111:H.R.45:

    We are not the first to have seen this hearing record. But we appear to be the first to have recognized its importance. This hearing record suggests strongly that the late Senator Thomas J. Dodd (D-CT) himself implanted the Nazi Weapons Law into American law, or, at very least, helped others to do so.

    Now you know the ugly truth about the roots of GCA '68. But you need to see -- with your own eyes -- the hard evidence of the Nazi roots of "gun control" in America presented in "Gun Control": Gateway to Tyranny.

    If you want to destroy "gun control", you can use this book to do it.
    http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/860211/posts

    Check google pagerank for clifylq.livejournal.com

    Current Mood: angry
    Tuesday, July 24th, 2012
    9:29 am
    OBAMA HALF MASTS FLAGS FOR HIS MASS MURDERS IN COLORADO FOR HE'S BATMAN THE DARK STAIN OVER AMERICA

    http://clifylq.blogspot.com/2012/07/democrats-oppose-obama-un-gun-control.html



    JAMES EAGAN HOLMES PERPETRATOR OF AURORA, COLORADO THEATER MASSACRE A CIA OPERATIVE

    July 21, 2012 · by Ray · in Science and News

    By now, everyone in the modern world has heard the news about the massacre at the Cinemark movie theater in Aurora, Colorado where James Eagan Holmes, dressed in full body armor opened fire on moviegoers at the screening of the new Batman movie “Dark Knight Rises” killing 12 and injuring some 60. On the surface, it appears the shooter James Eagan Holmes was completely off the record to authorities having no criminal record at all and only a speeding ticket in 2011.

    What we are told about Holmes is that he was a medical student graduating with highest honors with a neuroscience degree at the University of California in Riverside in 2010. In 2011, he enrolled in a neuroscience program at the University of Colorado but, recently was in the process of withdrawal. Holmes apparently came from a moderate income family life in San Diego, California.

    James Eagan Holmes is said to have been a person of little words with an inquiring mind. Weapons in his possession were an AR 15 assault rifle, Remington shotgun, and two 40 caliber Glock handguns which were purchased recently in May, June, and July of 2012. With the info we have it seems Holmes simply got infatuated with guns and very recently planned the attack for no apparent reason or reasons unknown to anyone else but Holmes himself. His academic record was good and the prospects of further achievements were also very good. His family was stable and his own situation was problem free.

    So, we are supposed to believe Holmes simply went nuts and decided to kill a few people even though he was problem free. I don’t buy this explanation at all. This supposedly random incident stinks with the smell of CIA involvement when the whole picture is put together.

    First of all, he basically lived on campus over the last few years where CIA recruiters frequent daily trying to find new talent for the agency and he would have been a prime interest for several recruitment attempts during his time on campus.

    Secondly, his recent withdrawal from school coincides with his purchase of weapons. This is an indication that he was recruited by the agency in the last 6 months and immediately began planning his mission.

    There are many reasons the CIA would want to create a high profile massacre in the national media. The threat of terrorism is kept alive and well in the minds of the public allowing more freedom killing legislation to be enacted at home, as well as providing the necessity to wage wars abroad.

    Recent attempts for gun control at home as well as the desire to sign a United Nations arms treaty are the main reasons to stage a massacre involving the use of guns.



    http://supportbordercontrols.blogspot.com/2009/03/us-senator-t-dodds-uses-nazi-hitlers.html


    COLORADO BATMAN SHOOTING SHOWS OBVIOUS SIGNS OF BEING STAGED

    Friday, July 20, 2012
    by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger
    Editor of NaturalNews.com

    (NaturalNews) James Holmes, the Aurora, Colorado shooter who reportedly opened fire at a Batman movie premiere, was a medical student at the University of Colorado, pursuing a PhD in neuroscience, reports ABC News. (http://abcnews.go.com/US/mass-shooting-colorado-movie-theater-14-peop...)

    As part of the attack, Holmes painted his hair red and referred to himself as "The Joker," one of the arch enemies in the DC Comics-inspired Batman movie series. (http://newyork.cbslocal.com/2012/07/20/police-14-dead-in-colorado-the...)

    According to news reports, this sudden violent rampage was completely out of character for James Holmes, who was described as "shy."

    The New York Times is now reporting:

    Billy Kromka, a pre-med student at the University of Colorado, Boulder, worked with Mr. Holmes for three months last summer as a research assistant in a lab of at the Anschutz Medical Campus. Mr. Kromka said he was surprised to learn Mr. Holmes was the shooting suspect. "It was just shocking, because there was no way I thought he could have the capacity to do commit an atrocity like this," he said. (http://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/21/us/colorado-mall-shooting.html?page...)

    "He spent much of his time immersed in the computer, often participating in role-playing online games..."

    There is already conjecture that James Holmes may have been involved in mind-altering neuroscience research and ended up becoming involved at a depth he never anticipated. His actions clearly show a strange detachment from reality, indicating he was not in his right mind. That can only typically be accomplished through drugs, hypnosis or trauma (and sometimes all three).

    His behavior doesn't add

    His behavior already reveals stark inconsistencies that question the mainstream explanation of events. For example, he opened fire on innocent people but then calmly surrendered to police without resistance. This is not consistent with the idea of "killing everyone."

    Furthermore, he then admitted to police that his apartment was booby-trapped with explosives. If you were really an evil-minded Joker trying to kill people (including cops), why would you warn them about the booby trap in advance? It doesn't add up.

    "Holmes was taken into custody shortly after the shooting, police said, adding he didn't resist when he was arrested," reports a local CBS news affiliate (http://newyork.cbslocal.com/2012/07/20/police-14-dead-in-colorado-the...).

    "After his arrest, Holmes told police about 'possible explosives in his residence,' Oates said. When police searched his apartment, they discovered it was booby-trapped and evacuated surrounding buildings, police said. Oates said bomb technicians are determining how to disarm flammable or explosive material in the third-floor apartment. He said police could be there some time."

    None of this checks out. If you're a killer bent on causing mayhem, why tell the police about your surprise bomb waiting for them back at your apartment?

    Holmes was clearly provided with exotic gear (and bomb-making skills)



    http://clifylq.livejournal.com/6656.html


    Continuing from CBS:

    "He said pictures from inside the apartment are fairly disturbing and the devices look to be sophisticated, adding the booby-traps were 'something I've never seen.' One rifle, two handguns, a knife, a bullet proof vest, a ballistic helmet, a gas device, a gas mask, military SWAT clothing and unidentified explosives were also found in Holmes' car, a law enforcement source told CBS News. Oates said Holmes wore a gas mask, a ballistic helmet and vest as well as leg, groin and throat protectors during the shooting."

    Added on July 22nd: "He allegedly wore a helmet, a throat guard, a ballistic vest, ballistic leggings and gloves and was dressed in black." (http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/explosives-removed-from-james-...)

    In other words, this guy was equipped with exotic gear by someone with connections to military equipment. SWAT clothing, explosives, complex booby-traps... c'mon, this isn't a "lone gunman." This is somebody who was selected for a mission, given equipment to carry it out, then somehow brainwashed into getting it done.

    "Aurora Police Chief Dan Oates said Holmes' apartment is booby-trapped with a 'sophisticated' maze of flammable devices. It could take hours or days for authorities to disarm it," reports Yahoo News (http://sg.sports.yahoo.com/blogs/lookout/suspect-neuroscience-phd-stu...).

    UPDATE: (This section added to the story Saturday at 2:30 pm central, July 21, 2012). It is now being reported that exotic, advanced booby-traps have been disarmed at the apartment of James Holmes. The Denver affiliate of CBS News is now reporting: (http://denver.cbslocal.com/2012/07/21/officials-expect-explosions-as-...)

    Officials say they have removed all major threats at the booby-trapped apartment of the Aurora movie theater shooting suspect on Saturday. They have used a robot to go inside James Holmes' apartment. ...They were able to disable a trip wire that was set to go off when the apartment door was opened. "This is some serious stuff that our team is dealing with..."

    Shortly before noon crews were successful performing a controlled detonation... More controlled detonations were possible.

    ...there were multiple trip wires throughout the apartment. Investigators have also seen what appear to be mortars planted in the apartment -- sort of the kind of mortars that might be seen in a commercial fireworks show. Up to a half dozen of them are scattered around.

    ...they have seen a number of inflated balloons in the apartment... with many appearing to be filled with a powder. Also linked together are bottles of liquid. ...a strong smell of gasoline emanating from the apartment.

    ...several boxes on top of the refrigerator and there are lights flashing on the boxes.

    ...30 aerial shells (fireworks) commercially legally available for purchase. ...the suspect may have filled them with smokeless powder. ...entering the apartment would have caused a trip wire to trigger one liquid container to pour/mix with another. When the two mix together, they set off the main charge of the device which may be additional flammable liquids.

    ...an enormously dangerous mission. About 100 personnel are on scene.

    And the BBC is now reporting: (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-18937726)

    Technicians made a first attempt on Friday to disarm the traps, believed to include explosives, but withdrew when it became clear the property was too dangerous to enter. Sgt Carlson said the device was set up to detonate when the first person entered the flat. "We've defeated first threat. It was set up to kill, and that could have been police officers or anything," she said.

    "In addition to the shells found in the apartment, jars of a kind of accelerant were also found inside the dwelling, said Aurora Police Sgt. Cassidee Carlson." (http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000087239639044446430457754103267932...) "Aurora Police Chief Dan Oates expressed frustration on Friday with the web of wires and devices Mr. Holmes had connected inside his apartment, which were hindering the investigation into the shooting. ...It was unlike anything he had seen before."

    FBI has a track record of staging similar assaults, then stopping them at the last minute

    This is not your run-of-the-mill crime of passion. It was a carefully planned, heavily funded and technically advanced attack. Who might be behind all this? The FBI, of course, which has a long history of setting up and staging similar attacks, then stopping them right before they happen. See four documented stories on these facts:

    http://www.naturalnews.com/035849_domestic_terror_plots_FBI.html
    http://www.naturalnews.com/034325_FBI_entrapment_terror_plots.html
    http://www.naturalnews.com/033751_FBI_terrorism.html
    http://www.naturalnews.com/035757_FBI_terror_plots_false_flag.html

    As you soak all this in, remember that the FBI had admitted to setting up terror plots, providing the weapons and gear, staging the location of the bombings and even driving the vehicles to pull it off! This is not a conspiracy theory, it's been admitted by the FBI right out in the open. Even the New York Times openly reports all this in stories like this one:

    NYT: Terrorist Plots, Hatched by the F.B.I. (http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/29/opinion/sunday/terrorist-plots-help...)

    THE United States has been narrowly saved from lethal terrorist plots in recent years -- or so it has seemed. A would-be suicide bomber was intercepted on his way to the Capitol; a scheme to bomb synagogues and shoot Stinger missiles at military aircraft was developed by men in Newburgh, N.Y.; and a fanciful idea to fly explosive-laden model planes into the Pentagon and the Capitol was hatched in Massachusetts. But all these dramas were facilitated by the F.B.I., whose undercover agents and informers posed as terrorists offering a dummy missile, fake C-4 explosives, a disarmed suicide vest and rudimentary training. ...the F.B.I. provided a van loaded with six 55-gallon drums of "inert material," harmless blasting caps, a detonator cord and a gallon of diesel fuel to make the van smell flammable. An undercover F.B.I. agent even did the driving...

    Comment added for clarification: I'm on the record saying, in the video posted below, that the FBI is "80% good guys" and "20% bad guys," which is typical for almost any law enforcement organization. Most FBI men and women are working in the interests of upholding the law. It's only a relatively small number who engage in the kind of terrorism training mentioned by the New York Times, above.

    Mystery man Holmes has no background

    On top of all this, Holmes apparently has no background. "He's not on anybody's radar screen -- nothing," said a peace officer in a NYT article. "This guy is somewhat of an enigma. Nobody knows anything about him." (http://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/21/us/colorado-mall-shooting.html)

    Mr. Holmes's only criminal history is a traffic summons, the authorities said. He earned a bachelor's degree with honors in neuroscience in 2010 from the University of California, Riverside, and was a graduate student in neurosciences at the University of Colorado at Denver's Anschutz Medical Campus... He was currently collecting unemployment...

    Question: How does an unemployed medical student afford $20,000 in weapons gear?

    If you start to look at the really big picture here, the obvious question arises: How does an unemployed medical student afford all the complex weapons gear, bomb-making gear, "flammable" booby trap devices, ammunition, multiple magazines, bullet-proof vest, groin protection, ballistic helmet, SWAT uniform and all the rest of it?

    Added July 22nd: "Police said Holmes spent months amassing explosives, weapons and ammunition." (http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/explosives-removed-from-james-...)

    A decent AR-15 rifle costs $1,000 or more all by itself. The shotgun and handgun might run another $800 total. Spare mags, sights, slings, and so on will run you at least another $1,000 across three firearms. The bullet-proof vest is easily another $800, and the cost of the bomb-making gear is anybody's guess. With all the specialty body gear, ammunition, booby-trap devices and more, I'm guessing this is at least $20,000 in weapons and tactical gear, much of which is very difficult for civilians to get in the first place. Comment added: Don't forget the cost of all the training (thousands of dollars) and the bomb-making equipment. Holmes reportedly had 30 improvised grenades, mortars, binary liquids that explode when mixed, wires, exotic bomb equipment... this gets expensive very quickly (even if you can source this equipment!)

    The mere manufacture of an explosive booby-trap device is, all by itself, a felony crime by the way. And remember: "Aurora Police Chief Dan Oates said Holmes' apartment is booby-trapped with a 'sophisticated' maze of flammable devices. It could take hours or days for authorities to disarm it," reported Yahoo News (http://sg.sports.yahoo.com/blogs/lookout/suspect-neuroscience-phd-stu...).

    Question: Where does an unemployed, introverted medical school student get the training to deploy sophisticated booby traps, tactical body armor, weapons systems and more? Certainly not in graduate school!

    All this leads to an obvious third party influence over all this. Someone else taught this guy these skills and funded the acquisition of the equipment.

    Update: An article posted on Sunday by the Daily Mail reveals Holmes had a "'mind-boggling' stash of ammunition" and "three types of explosives were found - jars filled with accelerates, chemicals that would explode when mixed together and more than 30 improvised grenades." This further adds to the financial cost tally of what it took to put all this together. (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2177156/James-Holmes-Dark-Kni...)

    The Wall Street Journal is also now reporting: "the suspect bought four guns over the past 60 days, and over the Internet bought 3,000 rounds for an assault rifle, 3,000 rounds for Glock handguns and about 300 shotgun rounds. The suspect also had a 100-round drum-style magazine for the assault rifle that would have allowed him to fire 50 to 60 rounds a minute." (http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000087239639044446430457754103267932..)

    Note: Some readers have questioned the $20,000 figure estimated here, saying this gear could have been acquired for only $10,000 or so. I doubt that, as all the extras that you need to effectively run these guns cost a lot of money: training courses, spare magazines, etc. Just a decent AR-15 battle sight (a holographic red dot sight) can run $1,000 - $2,000. Search "ACOG" if you don't believe me. It is also reported that Holmes bought 6,000 rounds of ammo, which definitely isn't cheap either, especially given that we now know half of those rounds were rifle rounds. It's clear this guy was spending big bucks. Whether it's $10k or $20k isn't really that much of a point.



    http://www.libertygunrights.com/TreatySet10Pgs.pdf

    Staged just in time for a vote on the UN small arms treaty?

    More and more, this shooting is looking like a deliberate plot staged by the government itself much like Operation Fast and Furious pulled off by the ATF (http://www.naturalnews.com/032934_ATF_illegal_firearms.html) which helped smuggle tens of thousands of guns into Mexico for the purpose of causing "gun violence" in the USA, then blaming the Second Amendment for it.

    All this looks like James Holmes completed a "mission" and then calmly ended that mission by surrendering to police and admitting everything. The mission, as we are now learning, was to cause as much terror and mayhem as possible, then to have that multiplied by the national media at exactly the right time leading up the UN vote next week on a global small arms treaty that could result in gun confiscation across America. (http://lewrockwell.com/eddlem/eddlem61.1.html)

    Even Forbes.com wrote about this quite extensively, warning readers about the coming gun confiscation effort related to the UN treaty. The story was authored by Larry Bell (http://www.forbes.com/sites/larrybell/2011/06/07/u-n-agreement-should...) and says the UN treaty could "override our national sovereignty, and in the process, provide license for the federal government to assert preemptive powers over state regulatory powers guaranteed by the Tenth Amendment in addition to our Second Amendment rights."

    In other words, this has all the signs of Fast & Furious, Episode II. I wouldn't be surprised to discover someone in Washington was behind it all. After all, there's no quicker way to disarm a nation and take total control over the population than to stage violence, blame it on firearms, then call for leaders to "do something!" Such calls inevitably end up resulting in gun confiscation, and it's never too long after that before government genocide really kicks in like we saw with Hitler, Stalin, Pol Pot, Mao and other tyrants.

    Governments routinely murder millions

    Here's a short list of government mass murder carried out throughout history, almost always immediately following the disarmament of the public (and usually involving staged false flag events to justify the disarmament):

    50+ million dead: Mao Ze-Dong (China, 1958-61 and 1966-69, Tibet 1949-50)

    12+ million dead: Adolf Hitler (Germany, 1939-1945) - concentration camps, civilian deaths and dead Russian POWs

    8+ million dead: Leopold II of Belgium (Congo, 1886-1908)

    6+ million dead: Jozef Stalin (USSR, 1932-39)

    5+ million dead: Hideki Tojo (Japan, 1941-44)

    2+ million dead: Ismail Enver (Turkey, 1915-22)

    1.7 million dead: Pol Pot (Cambodia, 1975-79)

    1.6 million dead: Kim Il Sung (North Korea, 1948-94)

    1.5 million dead: Menghistu (Ethiopia, 1975-78)

    1 million dead: Yakubu Gowon (Biafra, 1967-1970)

    900,000 dead: Leonid Brezhnev (Afghanistan, 1979-1982)

    800,000 dead: Jean Kambanda (Rwanda, 1994)

    See more at:

    http://www.scaruffi.com/politics/dictat.html

    Death by government:

    http://www.hawaii.edu/powerkills/DBG.CHAP1.HTM
    http://www.infowars.com/democide-government-killed-over-260-million-i...

    A "monopoly of force" in government is far more dangerous than a crazed lone shooter

    So yes, James Holmes and other crazed shooters kill a number of people each year in random acts of violence. It's horrifying and wrong, but it's nothing compared to the millions of lives that governments tend to destroy when they gain total power over the populace.

    The most dangerous thing in the world, it turns out, is not a crazy person with a rifle; it's a government with a "monopoly of force" over the entire population. And that's exactly what the UN spells out as its goal for the world: Stripping all power from individual citizens and handing "monopolies of force" to the governments of the world, shoring up their positions as the only "legitimate" power on the planet.

    See this document entitled, "Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces (DCAF)" policy paper No. 24:

    http://www.naturalnews.com/files/Revisiting-the-State-Monopoly-on-the...

    As this document reveals, a table entitled "Governance solutions for reasserting the state monopoly on the use of force" lists the options available to governments to re-establish "monopolies of force" against their own people:

    • (Re-)establish state monopoly

    - Ownership of WMDs
    - Safety Inspectorates

    • Prohibit business activity

    - Justice and Execution
    - Deadly Force?

    • Regulate/limit activities

    - Private defense/security services
    - Control of financial transfers
    - Export controls
    - Transport and infrastructure safety
    - Environmental impact

    Interestingly, that document also describes "terrorism" in a way that perfectly matches the Aurora, Colorado "Batman" movie theater shooter:

    Terrorists aim to spread panic and fear in societies in order to achieve political goals, be they based on left- or right-wing, social-revolutionary, nationalistic or religious ideologies. They are organized in a clandestine way, most often in small groups and cells... Typical tactical means include kidnapping, hostage-taking, sabotage, murder, suicide attacks, vehicle bombs and improvised explosive devices.

    A global monopoly of force

    This document is a goldmine of information about the globalist agenda to disarm and enslave the population. Check out page 28, which reads:

    The legitimate monopoly of force should not be limited to the nation-state but should be based on the local, national, regional and the global levels.

    Global Security Governance and the Monopoly of Force

    At the global level no monopoly of violence exists. The UN Security Council already has a monopoly power to authorize the use of force at the global level, although the UN was never given the necessary means to exercise this authority, such as the capacity to implement sanctions, a police force and armed forces...

    This deficiency in global governance acts as a bottleneck and a barrier to the creation of the democratically legitimized monopoly of violence that is globally required.

    This story gets deep, doesn't it? Watch for more analysis here at NaturalNews.com, where we still fight for liberty and justice in a world that's increasingly becoming enslaved.

    UPDATE: Follow-up story now posted that asks the question: Why did no one fight back?

    That story is available now at NaturalNews.com:

    http://www.naturalnews.com/036537_James_Holmes_Batman_shooting.html
    http://www.naturalnews.com/036536_James_Holmes_shooting_false_flag.html



    clifylq


    http://clifylq.livejournal.com/
    http://clifylq.blogspot.com/
    http://www.myspace.com/434997466/blog
    http://supportbordercontrols.blogspot.com/
    http://clifylq.livejournal.com/calendar

    RSS: http://www.opednews.com/populum/author_rss.php?sid=2888


    ... http://halfstaff.org/


    US Flags to Half Staff Until 7/25/12 in Honor of Colorado Shooting Victims
    By Matt - Presidential Proclomation :

    As a mark of respect for the victims of the senseless acts of violence perpetrated on July 20, 2012, in Aurora, Colorado, by the authority vested in me as President of the United States by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, I hereby order that the flag of the United States shall be flown at half-staff at the White House and upon all public buildings and grounds, at all military posts and naval stations, and on all naval vessels of the Federal Government in the District of Columbia and throughout the United States and its Territories and possessions until sunset, July 25, 2012. I also direct that the flag shall be flown at half-staff for the same length of time at all United States embassies, legations, consular offices, and other facilities abroad, including all military facilities and naval vessels and stations.
    IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this twentieth day of July, in the year of our Lord two thousand twelve, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-seventh.

    Barack Obama AKA Barry Sotero ect. etc.

    clifylq.livejournal.com-Google pagerank and Worth

    Current Mood: angry
    Thursday, July 12th, 2012
    10:33 am
    AMERICAN REVOLUTION II MUST INCLUDE WIPING ISRA HELL OFF THE PLANET OF ITS EVIL TO WE AMERICANS

    http://supportbordercontrols.blogspot.com/2012/06/clifylqs-new-logo-united-well-stand.html#links




    http://clifylq.livejournal.com/38398.html


    AMERICA IT'S WAY OVER DUE FOR A CIVIL WAR BETWEEN WE AMERICANS AND THE ZIONIST NAZIS CONTROLLING OUR GOVERNMENT AND COUNTRY. BUT IN ORDER FOR IT TO SUCCEED WE MUST TOTALLY ANNILIATE ISRAEL AND ITS CONNECTION TO THE USA OR THE REVOLUTION WILL FAIL. IN ADDITION WE MUST TAKE OVER CONTROLS OF EVERY MEDIA SOURCE THAT HAS BEEN CONTROLLED BY THESE SAME ZIO BASTARDS TO SPREAD THE TRUTH TO THE AMERICAN PUBLIC OF WHAT IS REALLY GOING ON. WE MUST TAKE OVER THE FEDERAL RESERVE AND HANG EVERY ROTHSCHILD AND ROCKEFELLER AND THEIR AFFFILIATES TO REGAIN CONTROL OF THE AMERICAN TAXPAYER'S MONEY TO FREE OURSELVES FROM ZIONISM, SOCIALISM, AND FACISM THAT HAS US IN ITS GRIPS NOW. WE MUST STOP ALL OF THE WARS FOR ISRAEL AND BRING OUR TROOPS HOME TO SURROUND CAPITAL HILL TO REMOVE OBAMA AND HIS ZIO COMMIE BASTARDS TO INCLUDE THE CONGRESS, SENATE AND ALL OF THE ZIO CONTROLLED COURTS STARTING WITH THE SUPREME COURT. FINALLY WE MUST REMOVE THE OVER TWELVE MILLION ILLEGAL ALIENS IN OUR LAND AND CLOSE OUR BORDERS USING OUR NATIONAL GUARD WITH ORDERS TO SHOOT ANY THAT VIOLATE OUR SOVEREIGNTY AGAIN. clifylq


    http://clifylq.livejournal.com/83914.html

    "We are on the verge of a global tranformation all we need is the right major crisis and the nations will accept the NWO" David Rockefeller


    TO BEGIN, LET US LOOK AT WHERE WE STAND NOW:

    * We have a war going in Iraq and Afghanistan that the overwhelming majority of Americans don't want, and which resulted in a change from Republican to Democrat majorities in the Congress during the last election, and yet the war rages on, bankrupting our country, killing and poisoning our soldiers, polluting the planet with 'depleted' uranium, and -- if that is not enuf -- our so-called 'leaders' are sporting for another war in Iran. http://clifylq.livejournal.com/49895.html

    * We have Mexicans and who-knows-what-else pouring over our southern border, taking American jobs, raising the crime rates, sucking up health, welfare, educational and other government benefits, and coming just this close to qualifying for Social Security benefits even tho they are in this country illegally and have contributed little or nothing to its coffers, all while declaring that they are taking back 'their' land under the banner of 'Aztlan'. http://clifylq.livejournal.com/79985.html

    * We have inflation running at double-digit levels (altho the government is trying to hide this via non-publication of M3 and manipulation of COLA calculations), with interest rates held at virtually nothing, all of which will inevitably eat up Americans' savings and destroy the middle class.

    * We have a Social Security 'trust fund' which is supposed to be money that is set aside for retirees, but which has simply been taken from current wage-earners and placed in the government's general fund to be spent for current projects. The result of this is that the government now possesses a huge unfunded obligation to retirees which it will never be able to fulfill -- a fact which does not keep it from continuing to demand social security payments from all wage-earners to fund this Ponzi scheme. Only the self-employed have had the luxury of opting out of the SS system; but this option is proving worthless as inflation (see above) eats up workers' savings.

    * We have a 'free trade' policy which has led to the 'offshoring' of American jobs into the oblivion of the Giant Sucking Sound which Ross Perot predicted -- especially manufacturing jobs which have been the core of the American economy -- and this has resulted in the rapid degeneration of the economic landscape and the pushing of America toward Turd-World status, to say nothing of the loss of skills which those often-highly-technical jobs implied, and the loss of the equipment which those jobs required.

    * We have a recently-burst housing bubble, precipitated by the government's 'easy money' policy (artificially low interest rates -- see above) combined with lowered credit standards, whose intention -- at least by liberal theory -- was to make home ownership readily available for 'the poor' (ie, negroes and other minority trash), but whose effect was to create a rising inflationary spiral of housing prices combined with a tsunami of worthless mortgages (from the lowered credit standards, combined with the offshoring of the economy -- see above) which were 'repackaged' and sold off to investors -- mostly banks -- as high-grade investment vehicles, thus bringing banks and other institutional investors to bankruptcy or near-bankruptcy, and threatening the stability of the entire financial system. http://clifylq.livejournal.com/82460.html

    * We have a monetary system which is called the Federal Reserve, but which was established by and is currently owned by Jews -- the Rothschilds and their friends -- and which has drained off huge amounts of the nation's wealth into its private coffers since Paul Warburg (depicted as "Daddy Warbucks" in the cartoon strip "Little Orphan Annie") and his European banker friends frightened the nation into believing a central bank was necessary by deliberately creating the Panic of 1907. The stealing of America's wealth by the FED, as it is familiarly called, has occurred by two basic means. The first is by the government's payment of huge amounts of interest to the FED for its 'service' of 'issuing' currency -- currency which is actually printed by the Treasury Department's Bureau of Engraving and Printing -- when in fact the government has not the least need of the FED, and could easily issue its own interest-free and debt-free currency. The second way in which the FED has drained off American wealth is by the deliberate creation of recessions and depressions, including the Great Depression, where, by means of restricting the volume of currency, the FED threw hundreds of thousands of farmers and others into bankruptcy and took possesson of their property at fire-sale prices. A national bank for America, which the FED effectively is, was warned against in no uncertain terms by Jefferson, was the cause of the War of 1812, was killed temporarily by Jackson in 1836 at the price of near-assassination, was temporarily bypassed by Lincoln to no avail, was denounced by such perceptive individuals as Louis McFadden, Charles Lindbergh Sr and Henry Ford in the 20th century, and yet survives today behind its mask of 'government agency', just as deadly as when Jackson referred to it as 'a den of vipers'. http://clifylq.livejournal.com/82460.html

    * Just a few weeks after the present essay was posted to subscribers and on the Internet, the American nation suffered what is perhaps the most severe financial shock of its history: The failure of several 'Too Big To Fail' financial institutions, and the subsequent passage -- against the clear wishes of the American elecorate -- of the Great Bank Bailout and Train Robbery Bill that put the American people on the hook for 700 billion dollars -- an absolutely unheard-of amount. While the promoters of this bill insisted that the American financial system -- and perhaps that of the entire civilized world -- would collapse without it, critics noted that the bill was filled to the brim with pork, was absent legal oversight, and was clearly intended to protect the Golden Parachutes of the New York bankers, most of whom shared responsibility for the financial debacle that the Bill ws trying to remedy. Here is the take on this situation by anti-Zionist Jew Gilad Atzmon: [BEGIN]As the picture of the current economy disaster becomes ever more clear, it becomes rather obvious, to me at least, that the ideology and the people who are directly responsible for the mass killing of millions of Iraqis and the displacement of many other millions, the people who keep the Palestinians starved behind walls, are unfortunately very much the same people who are responsible for a class genocide of millions of disenfranchised Americans who are now on the brink of total dispossession. ... Earlier on I raised a rather crucial question: How is it that America failed to restrain its Wolfowitzes? How is that America let its foreign policy be shaped by some ruthless Zionists? How come alleged American "free media" failed to warn the American people of the enemy within?Money is probably the answer, it indeed makes the world go round, or at least the American housing market. COMMENT: "Money" is only a partial answer: Broadly speaking, the correct answer is that organized Jewish interests, a long time ago, determined to capture (take control of) the United States, and has pursued that goal with undivided attention ever since. --http://palestinethinktank.com/2008/09/30/gilad-atzmon-credit-crunch-or-rather-zio-punch/ [END] http://clifylq.livejournal.com/93980.html

    * Our 'leaders' have made a secret treaty -- the Security and Prosperity Partnership -- in which America is to be merged with Canada and Mexico. The existence of this treaty has been denied by Administration officials, but has been documented on official websites. Such a treaty would never be approved by the American people, and in any event could only be implemented with the 'advice and consent' of the Senate; and yet the plans for merging the three countries continues apace into a one-world (ie, one-world government) future where international communism and international capitalism become the tools by which the wealthy elites assume totalitarian power, and the freedom to which America has given birth, and which has provided a beacon of inspiration to the rest of the world, is finally and completely extinguished in the rise of the so-called New World Order (NWO). http://clifylq.livejournal.com/31181.html

    * We have a completely fake War on Terror which was supposedly begun as a result of an Arab attack on the Twin Towers and Pentagon ("911"), but which numerous researchers have now concluded was a 'false flag operation' orchestrated at the highest levels of our own governmnt in collusion with the Israeli secret service, the Mossad, whose motto is "By deception we shall make war". While this allegation may seem bizarre, the fact remains that (1) Bush has surrounded himself with fanaticical Israeli-firster Jews ("neocons"), and, as evidence uncovered by researcher Texe Marrs has demonstrated, is probably a Jew himself; and (2) the so-called Jewish Lobby, of which the Harvard academics Mersheimer and Walt have so recently and infamously written an entire best-selling book about, is so powerful that columnist Pat Buchanan dubbed Congress 'Israeli-occupied territory'. More particularly, it seems clear on reflection that the goal of 911 was two-fold -- first, to draw America into war against the Arabs with the purpose of supporting Israeli hegemonic ambitions, and especially Israeli lust for oil and 'lebensraum'; and second, to enable the government to impose a police state under cover of wartime 'necessity', thereby helping to usher in the NWO. It is thus no surprise that the government 'investigation' of 911 was a whitewash, that the 'unanswered questions' about this event stretch from here to Timbuktu, and that the War On Terror is headed by an Israeli-passport-holding dual-loyalist Jew whose last name, 'Chertoff' means 'Devil' in Russian, a fact which goes far in explaining why this Lenin-lookalike, as attorney-general of New Jersey at the time of 911, sent a planeload of Israeli suspects back to Israel without any investigation, and who, as head of Homeland Security today, decided to hire as two of his major assistants the former heads of the two most dreaded communist secret police agencies, the Soviet KGB (General Yevgeni Primakov) and the East German Stasi (Marcus Wolfe), both of them Jews. http://clifylq.livejournal.com/30099.html

    * We have a War on Drugs whose purpose seems mainly to reduce competition for the world's most prominent Drug Kingpin, the CIA, all while helping to usher in the NWO's totalitarian police state. The CIA's drug-running, first thoroughly documented in Alfred W McCoy's massive volume "The Politics of Heroin: CIA Complicity in the Global Drug Trade" (1972) and many times thereafter, funds the CIA's 'secret wars', its 'renditions' and worldwide network of secret prisons, and its University of Torture and Government Overthrow (School of the Americas).

    * We have racial preferences for negroes and other higgledy minorities which are intended to produce racial conflict with whites and thereby justify more Police Statism. When the negroes couldn't make any economic advancement even when given 'ekwul rites', the liberals had to do something to cover their asses and 'prove' they were right. Accordingly, they chose to impose racial preferences, with the excuse that 'white racism' was holding negroes back -- a clearly false proposition in view of the fact that all other minorities -- Chinese, Irish, Jews, etc -- in spite of far worse discrimination than blacks now experience, all became successful within a generation or two -- and this policy of anti-white discrimination was naturally supported by the New World Orderlies who saw the essential unfairness, and hence the tremendous potential for social unrest, which racial preferences presented. http://clifylq.livejournal.com/84517.html

    * We have 'hate speech' laws which are intended as the fine edge of the wedge to make politically incorrect thoughts into crimes, thereby achieving yet more control over the American population, all while stamping out the information that patriots need to identify and throw off their oppressors. http://clifylq.livejournal.com/15821.html

    * Within the last few years we have had a series of enormously abusive legislative and executive acts foisted upon us, including the Patriot Act, the Military Commissions Act, the rescinding of Posse Comitatus, and the countenancing of torture, not to mention the practice of 'signing statements' by means of which the President effectually places his own interpretation on legislation which may have little or no relation to the original intent of Congress. http://www.rense.com/general34/takeover.htm

    * We have a very clear Second Amendment which permits the possession and carrying of weapons,and we have millions of citizens who own guns, and are thus in some sense well-prepared to resist government tyranny; but on the other hand, we have suffered an unending series of attempts to neutralize that Second Amendment, from efforts to get the Supreme Court to declare it a 'collective' right, and hence not an individual one, to escalating attempts to impede gun sales, illegalize ammunition, and confiscate legal firearms. Indeed, the Supreme Court's recent Heller decision upholding the right of the individual to keep and bear arms was achieved with only a 5-4 majority, and this means that if there is another test of this essential right with but one new liberal appointment to the Court, this would almost certainly spell the end of the Second Amendment. What is worse, however, is the manipulation of people's thoughts thru the Jew-controlled mass media and educational establishment, in which gun owners are demonized, gun control is lauded, and students from the publik skoolz are dumbed down to such a degree that they do not know and cannot appreciate American history and the fact that guns were an essential part of that history. In fact, most people are so dumbed down that, as several commentators have noted and news stories have actually reported, the Constitution and Bill of Rights are likely to be regarded as subversive literature. http://clifylq.livejournal.com/6656.html

    * We have in the order of 600 gulags around the country with a capacity of hundreds of thousands if not millions of internees. Is it really sensible to think that these prisons are intended for anyone except dissenters, who will be incarcerated just as soon as martial law is imposed? http://clifylq.livejournal.com/21151.html

    * We have a President who took an oath which every President takes, to uphold and defend the Constitution, but who, in an extraordinarily candid moment of truth, angrily referred to the Constitution as 'a God-damned piece of paper'.

    * And above all, we have a Congress and a President who are dominated by a small but wealthy ethnic group -- Jews -- who are or have been the driving engine behind most of the above actions or policies, and who -- by means of their money and other influence -- will continue to dominate America and make this country a mere appendage of 'that shitty little country' Israel. http://clifylq.livejournal.com/60081.html

    As many have noted, the pattern of abuses which we have listed above is that of chipping away at our freedoms so gradually that few will notice, and fewer still protest, until those freedoms are gone and we are caught in a totalitarian web that constrains our every move. This, indeed, is what the 19th century French writer Alexis de Tocqueville predicted as constituting the end of American freedom, tho he did not see it as totalitarian so much as simply bureaucratic -- a word which so well describes the freedom-crimping so-called-democracies of Europe. As a general rule we are not taught about freedom, and especially we are not taught that freedom is like a muscle -- it must be exercised or else it weakens and eventually withers away; and for this reason most people are not psychologically prepared to defend it. There is an irony here, however, because the liberals and leftists who are proponents of Big Government and its Big Brother facilitator gun control believe that the government will 'wither away' -- hence producing freedom -- providing only that the government is in communist or socialist hands -- when in fact it is the nature of Big Government, of which communism and socialism are prime examples, to pile law upon law, rule upon rule and regulation upon regulation until freedom is completely gone -- hardly an act of withering away. The real problem, of course, is that nature abhors a vacuum, including a power vacuum, and this means that the 'power vacuum' of which freedom is composed has a tendency to be overtaken and replaced by government unless there is an active effort to retain that freedom. This, I believe, is what J Edgar Hoover meant when he said that freedom must be rewon by each generation; but in any event it is clear that government itself is the main threat to freedom. And since, as Lord Acton observed, power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely, it follows that, as the power of government grows, not only does freedom decline, but it declines into a condition in which corruption becomes rampant. For those who love freedom, then, the best analogy of our situation is perhaps the proverbial frog in the pot: When a frog is put into hot water, it will jump out; but, so they say, when placed into cold water, it stays put, and will continue to stay put as the temperature is gradually raised, right up until the time that the frog's goose is cooked.

    Now looking at the list of abuses which we have cited above, what is perfectly clear is that our leaders are pursuing policies which are grossly unpopular and/or grossly destructive of America, and ones which are leading to a New World Order/Jew World Order government. But one does not even have to agree that it is Jews who are largely responsible -- all one has to do is recognize that our political representatives in Washington are acting in a manner completely contrary to the best interests of America's core population and the will of the electorate, and that this behavior will lead to the destruction of America within only a few years. http://clifylq.livejournal.com/49895.html

    So what, then, is the solution to 'the Washington question'?? Vote the rascals out? Well, frankly, we have tried that, and it didn't work. We tried it in the last election to stop the war, but the Democrats, who replaced the ousted Republicans, won't even 'put it on the table'. And we tried it in the days of Newt Gingrich's 'Contract with America', where again nothing happened but a lot of rhetoric, and the complaint that Gingrich had 'put a contract ON America'. Indeed, as the NWO has tightened its grip, we have been striving ever harder for change, and yet nothing has worked. In fact, the chances for change have become less and less at the ballot box, where votes are counted electronically, and where in most places there is no 'paper trail' that can prove what has clearly been demonstrated in numerous instances, namely, electronic manipulation of the voting results. Even worse, enormously popular candidates who deviate from the NWO line -- Ron Paul being the prime example -- are denigrated and shunted aside, even tho their popularity and fundraising abilities seem to make them a shoo-in for bringing their party victory.

    So again I ask, What then is to be done? The answer, I think, is contained in the two quotations which head this essay, and which might be referred to as the Shooting Solution: It is time -- or very nearly time -- to start employing the Second Amendment for what its prime author, Thomas Jefferson, intended, namely, for patriots to use their arms to remind the politicians in Washington that they are in danger of death or serious bodily harm from those they supposedly represent as long as they continue to act contrary to the best interests of the core American population. Or to put it another way, while I myself am a generally nonviolent person, I simply do not see any alternative to using violence to change the dreadful and rapidly-deteriorating situation in which we find ourselves. The only thing that is going to have a stronger effect in Washington than Jewish money is violence against the political establishment by We The People; and unless we choose this alternative, and choose it soon, then the American nation -- and most probably the white race, and Western civilization -- is going to come to a rapid and inglorious end.

    Let me clarify a bit. As I observed in The Militia Solution, I have long maintained that the difference between a civilized and an uncivilized society is that the civilized society customarily settles differences nonviolently, while the uncivilized society customarily relies on violence. But if this is true, it is also true that even the civilized society has its roots in violence, because violence or the threat of violence is necessary to keep people from engaging in violence. This may seem like a sort of contradiction, but philosophers would recognize the containing of violence with violence as what might be called 'meta-violence', ie, violence about violence, with the intention of containing or eliminating it. In the present essay we are going to make use of this idea in proposing, first, that if there is to be a solution to the tyranny that is engulfing us -- a tyranny created by the machinations of the money and power elites, mostly Jewish -- then it is very likely going to be violent; but second, that there is a way to use violence so that the freedom won at such terrible personal cost for us by our Founders may be rewon by us with only a very small amount of violence, and in particular, meta-violence.

    But don't get me wrong: the object of my proposal is NOT the violent overthrow of our government -- to the contrary, my effort is precisely to PREVENT a violent overthrow -- something which might well be attempted by misguided patriots under present circumstances. More particularly, overthrow of the government produces anarchy, a state which is unstable, and which inevitably develops into dictatorship, since most people wish to live under a government of some kind, and since in a state of anarchy, a government will naturally crystallize around a strongman who will impose his will in lieu of law. Instead, what I propose in the present essay is to explain how just a small amount of violence can both prevent anarchy and also maintain the current form of government while securing our freedom by damping out government abuse.

    Now our situation at the present time is this: All the totalitarian measures are in place to create a full-blown police state, and all that is wanting is some event, such as war, or another 'Pearl Harbor' such as 911 was supposed to be -- which will spring the trap and give the Powers-That-Be an excuse to impose it. When this occurs, the first thing that will happen is gun confiscation, irrespective of what the Supremes have ruled; and you can bet that the cops are gong to be checking their gun registration and sales lists and knocking at your door demanding that you give up the best means that we now possess to confront the Orwellian nightmare. At that point, we have two choices: To give up our guns, or to resist with force. But who is going to resist? While I am not going to make any generalizations about Americans, let us remember what happened in Britain, Canada and Australia, where there was not a peep of protest when guns were effectively confiscated in these nations. And now that this tragedy has actually happened to these nations, there is not much left in the way of their complete enslavement, which seems to be proceeding apace. In fairness, it should be noted that only Americans have a Second Amendment, and it is this which emboldens such bumper-sticker slogans as 'They can have my gun when they pry it from my cold, dead fingers.' But whether this makes Americans any more difficult to disarm than Brits, Canadians or Aussies is anyone's guess at this point.

    But if all the news seems bad at present, there is in fact good news, because there is a way to take back our freedom, and to keep it. To explain, let us begin by noting that the American Revolution was midwifed by only a relatively few men -- and not only just a few men, but those without modern weapons or means of communication. As Margaret Mead once said, "Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful committed citizens can change the world; indeed it's the only thing that ever has." But how could it be done in this case? It is that very question which cries out to be answered, and it is that question that I plan to answer in this essay.



    http://supportbordercontrols.blogspot.com/2012/07/450-million-reasons-to-destroy.html#links


    AMERICA

    I just downloaded a copy of Janet Napolitano’s Rightwing Extremism: Current Economic and Political Climate Fueling Resurgence in Radicalization and Recruitment report.
    Here is a link so you can read it for yourself.
    http://seeingredaz.wordpress.com/2009/04/14/janet-napolitano-right-wing-extremists-pose-national-security-threats/

    It reads like a “Political enemies list” of the left. It basically tells the Department of Homeland Security to view anyone that opposes the Obama Administration as an enemy of the state.

    This includes but is not limited to Veterans groups. That’s right. The men and women that fight to keep America free are now enemies of the state.

    People that oppose illegal immigration. Yes people like me that are simply asking our government to make people obey the law are now enemies of the state.

    Napolitano is like a modern day Joseph Goebbels. For you Obamatrons, Goebbels was the propaganda minister for Adolf Hitler. Click the above link to see the Goebbels principles of propaganda. It spells out what Napolitano is doing to America by issuing this kind of directive. http://www.calvin.edu/academic/cas/gpa/goebmain.htm

    Read the report and you will see that the report is by design, nothing more than the government of the United States under the current leadership attempting to silence any and all opposition to it policy.

    This my friends is what this newly classified “Enemy of the State” calls the beginning of the end of America as we know it.


    DHS Janet Napolitano Lesbian
    http://clifylq.livejournal.com/51724.html

    FEDERAL LAW SUIT FILED

    The Law Center is asking the court to declare that the DHS policy violates the First and Fifth Amendments, to permanently enjoin the Policy and its application to the plaintiffs’ speech and other activities, and to award the plaintiffs their reasonable attorney’s fees and costs for having to bring the lawsuit.The Thomas More Law Center defends and promotes America’s Christian heritage and moral values, including the religious freedom of Christians, time-honored family values, and the sanctity of human life. It supports a strong national defense and an independent and sovereign United States of America. The Law Center accomplishes its mission through litigation, education, and related activities. It does not charge for its services. The Law Center is supported by contributions from individuals, corporations and foundations, and is recognized by the IRS as a section 501(c)(3) organization. You may reach the Thomas More Law Center at (734) 827-2001 or visit our website at http://www.thomasmore.org/.
    http://supportbordercontrols.blogspot.com/2009/04/obamas-propaganda-minister-joseph.html

    REMEMBER WACO AMERICA ZIO CONTROLLED FEDS USED TEAR GAS, NERVE GAS AND WHITE PHOSPEROUS ON MEN, WOMEN AND CHILDREN.

    WITH OUR US MILITARY STORMING CAPITAL HILL AND NOT CIVILIANS LIKE THOSE WHO WERE BRUTALLY MURDERED AT WACO OUR MILITARY WILL BE PROPERLY EQUIPPED TO DEAL WITH THOSE WHO THEY CONFRONT. INSTEAD WE NEED TO USE THESE BRUTAL TACTICS USED ON THE BRANCH DIVIDIAN COMPOUND ON ISRAEL AND GET SOME PAY BACK FOR THE PALESTIANIANS WHO ARE TREATED THIS WAY ON A DAY TO DAY BASIS AND FOR ALL THE WARS ISRAEL CAUSED AMERICA NOT TO MENTION THE TWIN TOWERS WHERE AMERICAN LIVES WERE LOST TO ISRAEL’S MOSSAD. http://clifylq.livejournal.com/115718.html




    AMERICA'S SHERIFFS FIGHT BARACK OBAMA AND THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT

    February 8, 2012
    by Volubrjotr

    Something extraordinary and historic took place mere days ago in Las Vegas, Nevada.

    For three days, from January 29 and 31, 2012, in the Tuscany Hotel & Casino, more than 120 county sheriffs, from across the United States of America, met in a first annual, “Constitutional Sheriffs Convention”.


    This is what Wikipedia says about U.S. sheriffs: “In the United States, a sheriff is a county official and is typically the top law enforcement officer of a county. Historically, the sheriff was also commander of the militia in that county. Distinctive to law enforcement in the United States, sheriffs are usually elected. The political election of a person to serve as a police leader is an almost uniquely American tradition.”

    The first Constitutional Sheriffs Convention is the brainchild of the www.CountySheriffProject.org and the Constitutional Sheriffs and Peace Officers Association at www.CSPOA.org .

    For a video describing the CSPOA, go to www.YouTube.com and type in:Special report: County Sheriffs Push Back Against Feds

    The convention’s objective is two-fold:

    1. To increase the understanding and awareness for all sheriffs and peace officers regarding the true power of our constitutional authority and duty to serve and protect the people for whom we work.

    2. To unite in a concerted effort to uphold and defend the United States Constitution.

    Given the importance of the convention, it is curious to say the least that the media have chosen to totally ignore it. Curious, too, is the fact that I scoured the Internet yesterday but could find scant news on the convention, much less a report – not even on the website of the County Sheriff Project.

    But I did find an audio of a 1.5 hr Revolution Radio broadcast on the convention, an hour of which consists of phoned-in interviews with several sheriffs who attended the conference, as well as other attendees, mainly Stewart Rhodes, founder of www.OathKeepers.org To listen to the audio, Go to google and type in: Revolution Radio: Constitutional Sheriffs Conference

    Stewart Rhodes said the sheriffs “are working on a series of resolutions” at the convention, among which is a “Resolution of the Sheriff Against NDAA 2012″, drafted by Rhodes and constitutional attorney Richard Fry, for the sheriffs to sign.

    NDAA is the notorious National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 which effectively nullifies the Bill of Rights by making it lawful for the U.S. President and the military to arrest and detain U.S. citizens without charge or trial. From the Oath Keepers’ website, it appears the sheriffs at the convention did not sign the Resolution as a collective body. Rhodes is asking the sheriffs to sign the Resolution as individual sheriffs.

    Rhodes opined that political party labels don’t mean much anymore, referring in particular to how the NDAA is “a bipartisan assault on our civil liberties,” which was spearheaded by Republican John McCain and Democrat Carl Levin.

    Rhodes emphasized that a second American Revolution has already taken place under our noses and our Constitution’s been overthrown. “We have had people who are determined to destroy our Constitutional Republic to create a tyranny.” But this revolution is not fully recognized by the American people, who must be informed and educated. He calls for Americans, especially the military and the police, to emulate the “peaceful revolution of 1800″ when Thomas Jefferson and James Madison rose up against the Anti-Sedition Act to sweep federal oath-breakers out of office.

    Rhodes was followed by several sheriffs, who spoke one by one. They included: Sheriff Dean Wilson of Del Norte County in Northern California, Sheriff John Cooke of Weld County, Colorado, Sheriff John Lopeyfrom Northern California’s Siskiyou County and Sheriff Greg Hagwood of Plumas County in Northern California. An excellent video of these men explaining there problems with Federal agents and how they defeated them can be seen by going to www.YouTube.com and typing in: Constitutional sheriffs. And for a very good explanation of a Sheriff successfully opposing the Federal Government and protecting the citizens in his county, type in: Sheriff Tony DeMeo.

    120 to 140 sheriffs from all across America. Many (“a great showing”) from California and the western states, but also from Texas, Florida and the eastern seaboard. Some sheriffs also brought their second-in-charge to the convention. A list of the names of the sheriffs who were at the convention will be published.

    There was a Sheriffs Panel in which 8 sheriffs spoke.

    There were presentations by various speakers who “spoke powerfully” on Agenda 21 and the Bill of Rights. Even though some of the sheriffs didn’t know about some of the issues, “they are listening” and “have a humility about them.” “They really want to know and are sticking their necks out by coming here.

    What the sheriffs got out of the conference: 1. A renewed knowledge and understanding of the U.S. Constitution and “how it’s related to county sheriffs who are sworn to defend and protect the Constitution.

    2. “A good idea and understanding of what’s been going on” in the sheriff’s own county and in other counties.

    Sheriff Wilson’s county, as an example, is on the border between Northern California and Oregon. 74% of the county is federal and state land. The county’s agriculture and timber industry are under “attack” by the federal government’s Interior Department and BLM (Bureau of Land Management). Sheriff Cooke described how the federal government wanted to burn some grassland in his county which was adjacent to farmers’ and ranchers’ property. So he issued a warning to the feds not to burn, which was ignored. But the county stood firm – and the federal government backed down and decided not to burn. Sheriff Cooke also said that the federal government tells the sheriffs how to run their jails, although Washington D.C. has no authority over this.

    3. The realization that many of the problems experienced by separate counties are common to all sheriffs across the nation, “all part of a larger picture.” Sheriff Cooke calls the conference “awesome”: “We sheriffs tend to live on an island, but the conference makes us realize we have common problems.” Those common problems are the federal government’s over-regulation; “overreach” of its authority on matters such as forest land in Northern California; and “infringement against the Constitutional rights of our citizens.” The sheriffs “heard absolute horror stories on what’s going on from one coast to the other – especially in Connecticut and Delaware.”

    4. Not only are these problems common to the counties of all the states, these issues also “affect all the citizens of America.” “The problems we’re facing are universal.”

    5. One of those issues that affect all the citizens is the NDAA. The sheriffs at the convention learned how the NDAA “blatantly strips authority from sheriffs into the hands of the military and the President” as well as stripping “the rights from citizens.”

    6. Learning about the limits of the sheriffs’ own authority, even in “little things.” Sheriff Cooke gave an example of a Sheriff Akita who said he “did away with DUI checkpoints because they are unconstitutional” and sheriffs “shouldn’t tolerate it.” Why? Because “it is not right to stop people when they haven’t done anything wrong.”

    What is needed: The sheriffs said an organization “like this” (i.e., the convention) is needed “on a national level” to help county sheriffs across America. “The time has come for a nationally recognized organization” of America’s county sheriffs.

    In the meantime, there are already plans for Northern California’s sheriffs to meet again, scheduled for 2 p.m., Saturday, February 25, 2012. There are also plans for other events in Northern California to discuss land management, land use, water issues, the declining timber industry (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service recently issued yet another spotted owl protection), and threats against mining, agriculture, and recreational use. California’s State Sheriffs Association has formed a policy committee to deal with common problems, especially those in Northern California.

    What most impressed the sheriffs:

    1. Sheriff Hagwood: It’s an “eye opener” that the same issues are being dealt with across the country. That’s “disturbing”. At the same time, it’s “good to know that distinguished sheriffs are taking steps to safeguard our Constitution.” They are willing “to stand up, stand tall, to serve the People and stand for the Constitution.

    2. They now feel emboldened: Sheriff Wilson: “Just having an organization like this and meeting sheriffs from across America who are like-minded, emboldens you to take steps that are necessary to stand up for the rights promised in the Constitution, because now you know other sheriffs have his back” and will “stand beside me.”

    3. Sheriff Cooke: “There’s strength in numbers, not fighting it alone.”

    What the sheriffs promise: “The U.S. Constitution was founded by devout Christian men and they got it right. Now it’s up to us – sheriffs and peace officers – to keep it.” “The problems we’re facing are universal. But sheriffs bound together have real strength to push back.” “Sheriffs all over are going to fight back.”

    The number of sheriffs who will attend next year’s convention will probably be double the number as this year. Sheriffs are learning “how to fight back with an organization like this.” “The only thing I’ve ever sworn to is my oath of office and my marriage vows. When sheriffs take a leadership role, the people will also be inspired. We realize that our freedoms are being threatened” on “county, state, and national” levels. We must energize and educate citizens and officials.” “Sheriffs are beginning to recognize the responsibility they have to citizens is much larger than upholding the law. We now appreciate the gravity of the situation. We recognize our larger responsibility is to protect the liberties [that are] absolutely essential to our way of life. The 2012 election is make or break. We must realize that the enemy is within, not without. We must demand that the federal government behave.”

    “It won’t be easy but we’ll do it!”

    That’s when my vision got blurred by the tears streaming down my face….God bless the county sheriffs who attended this convention. May their numbers multiply. Pray for our sheriffs! Pray for America! http://politicalvelcraft.org/2012/02/08/americas-sheriffs-fight-barack-obama-and-federal-government-from-pravda-russia/

    If you would like to follow Dr. Eowyn’s indepth reporting on critical affairs, you can visit her website athttp://fellowshipofminds.wordpress.com or write to her at Fellowhipminds@gmail.com

    PRAVDA, RUSSIA



    http://clifylq.livejournal.com/96168.html


    clifylq

    http://clifylq.livejournal.com/
    http://clifylq.blogspot.com/
    http://www.myspace.com/434997466/blog
    http://supportbordercontrols.blogspot.com/
    http://clifylq.livejournal.com/calendar

    RSS: http://www.opednews.com/populum/author_rss.php?sid=2888



    President Obama signed an Executive Order for “National Defense” yesterday that claims executive authority to seize all US resources and persons, including during peacetime, for self-declared “national defense.” The EO claims power to place any American into military or “allocated” labor use. Here is the US government claiming it can Constitutionally assassinate Americans upon the non-reviewable dictate of the leader, as these criminals take psychopathic steps to murder Americans who expose their crimes. Here is NDAA 2012 where US government claims it can Constitutionally disappear Americans and then appoint a tribunal with death sentence authority (unless unlimited detention is their choice). Here is the 2006 Military Commissions Act that says the same.
    http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2012/03/16/executive-order-national-defense-resources-preparedness http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2012/03/obama-executive-order-us-can-seize-any-person-any-resource-any-time.html



    Menachem Begin Israeli Zionist Nazi
    http://clifylq.livejournal.com/60081.html

    NAZI-LIKE RACIAL VIEWS OF ISRAELI'S PRIME MINISTER MENACHEM BEGIN

    "Our race is the Master Race. We are divine gods on this planet. We are as different from the inferior races as they are from insects. In fact, compared to our race, other races are beasts and animals, cattle at best. Other races are considered as human excrement. Our destiny is to rule over the inferior races. Our earthly kingdom will be ruled by our leader with a rod of iron. The masses will lick our feet and serve us as our slaves." http://www.voicesofpalestine.org/outrageous/organtraffic.asp

    Check google pagerank for clifylq.livejournal.com

    Current Mood: angry
    Wednesday, July 4th, 2012
    2:17 pm
    Wednesday, June 27th, 2012
    9:57 am
    ZIONIST RUN US SUPREME COURT GUTS ARIZONA'S IMMIGRATION LAW OBAMA ORDERS FEDS IGNORE AZ IMMIGRATION

    http://usbacklash.org/obama-instructs-federal-authorities-to-ignore-illegal-immigrant-arrests-in-arizona/





    MY DEAR FELLOW AMERICANS, a third Zionist Jew is about to be raised to the highest judicial bench of our nation. As Pat Buchanan warned, if Kagan is confirmed, Jews, who represent less than 2 percent of the US population, will have 33 percent of the Supreme Court seats.

    Do we really want Christ-hating…Freedom-hating Zionist Jews to rule our country? Jews now have control of every sphere of American life.

    Wake up America! — Turn off your TV! –The Jews wish to destroy our once Christian nation!
    http://www.realjewnews.com/?p=517



    http://clifylq.livejournal.com/100815.html


    WHY REPUBLICANS SHOULD SAY "HELL NO" TO THIS LAWLESS PRESIDENT

    by Paul Mirengoff at PowerLine:

    There’s been much speculation about whether the Obama administration has a Plan B ready in case the Supreme Court strikes down all or some of Obamacare. But it’s clear that the White House was ready today when the Court rejected its challenge to the constitutionality of an Arizona law requiring local law enforcement officers, during routine stops, to check the immigration status of anyone they suspect is in the country illegally.

    The White House promptly reacted to the decision, which also struck down three important provisions through which Arizona attempted to counteract the federal government’s unwillingness to do anything much about the flood of illegal aliens into the State. First, and predictably, Obama renewed his call for comprehensive immigration reform. Sen. Harry Reid quickly echoed the White House, tweeting that “[Republicans] must join [Democrats] to forge fair, tough, practical solutions.”

    Next, the administration announced measures designed to undermine the portion of the Arizona law that was upheld, unanimously, by the Supreme Court. The Department of Homeland Security said it would exclude Arizona from a program known as 287(g), which allows the feds to deputize local officials to make immigration-based arrests. A Homeland Security official explained that the administration finds such agreements “not useful” in states that have Arizona-style laws. I guess the program is “useful” only in states that aren’t taking meaningful measures to identify illegal aliens.

    Accordingly, local police in Arizona will have to rely on federal officials to arrest illegal aliens. But federal officials have made it clear that the feds will not respond to calls from Arizona law enforcement unless the person detained meets certain criteria, such as being wanted for a felony. Being an illegal alien is not enough. As Obama showed with his unilateral mini-DREAM act, this administration is no longer interested in enforcing the immigration laws except perhaps against illegal aliens who are shown to have engaged in felonious conduct.

    In addition, the Justice Department set up a hotline through which people can complain about having their immigration status checked by Arizona law enforcement officials. Obama thus hopes to drum up complaints against Arizona law enforcement agents. He wants to make the federal government a party to the harassment of those trying to do what Obama won’t – enforce the law. Obama hopes to intimidate them into not using their authority to address the severe problem of illegal immigration — authority granted by the state legislature and upheld as constitutional by the Supreme Court.

    Given all of this, it’s quite clear that the Republicans should say “hell no” to Obama’s call for comprehensive immigration reform. Republicans must not permit themselves to be coerced into writing a new immigration law by Obama’s refusal to enforce the law we have.

    Moreover, what is the point of legislating with a lawless administration? Legislation on an issue like immigration requires compromise, and that’s fine – I have no objection in principle to compromising. But suppose a compromise is reached. This president has demonstrated that his response would likely be to ignore the provisions the Republicans insisted upon – because ignoring them is “the right thing to do.”

    Immigration reform, if it is to occur, must await the election of a president who, unlike Obama, is willing to enforce the law as written, not just the portions of the law he finds palatable. Indeed, I’m tempted to say that the passage of compromise legislation on any important issue should await the election of such a president.
    http://mnprager.wordpress.com/2012/06/26/obama-government-sabotages-arizonas-attempts-to-cause-peace-and-order-for-its-citizens/



    http://clifylq.livejournal.com/110457.html


    PAYBACK: OBAMA INSTRUCTS FEDERAL AUTHORITIES TO IGNORE ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION ARRESTS IN ARIZONA

    On the heels of the Supreme Court decision to strike much of Arizona’s immigration law, and as a payback to Jan Brewer and Arizona, the Obama administration has instructed federal authorities to disregard the US Immigration Laws, and ignore actual cases of illegal immigration reported from Arizona.

    This proves that the Obama administration has a complete disregard for our nation’s laws, and wants to allow all illegal immigrants to enter the United States and stay in the country illegally.

    If the Obama administration will not uphold our nation’s laws, and will sue anyone who tries to keep our nation safe, then the United States will not be safe again until Obama and the Democrats are out of office.

    The Obama administration said Monday it is suspending existing agreements with Arizona police over enforcement of federal immigration laws, and said it has issued a directive telling federal authorities to decline many of the calls reporting illegal immigrants that the Homeland Security Department may get from Arizona police.



    http://clifylq.livejournal.com/14386.html


    Administration officials, speaking on condition they not be named, told reporters they expect to see an increase in the number of calls they get from Arizona police — but that won’t change President Obama’s decision to limit whom the government actually tries to detain and deport.

    “We will not be issuing detainers on individuals unless they clearly meet our defined priorities,” one official said in a telephone briefing.

    The official said that despite the increased number of calls, which presumably means more illegal immigrants being reported, the Homeland Security Department is unlikely to detain a significantly higher number of people and won’t be boosting personnel to handle the new calls.

    “We do not plan on putting additional staff on the ground in Arizona,” the official said.



    http://clifylq.livejournal.com/47351.html


    The Supreme Court ruled Monday that Arizona may not impose its own penalties for immigration violations, but it said state and local police could check the legal status of those they have reasonable suspicion to believe are in the country illegally.

    That means police statewide can immediately begin calling to check immigration status — but federal officials are likely to reject most of those calls.

    Federal officials said they’ll still perform the checks as required by law but will respond only when someone has a felony conviction on his or her record. Absent that, ICE will tell the local police to release the person.

    Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer said the court’s decision frees police up to perform immigration checks. In anticipation of the ruling, she issued an executive order calling for guidance to be issued to every police department on how to fairly carry out the law.

    “We will move forward, instructing law enforcement to begin practicing what the United States Supreme Court has upheld,” she said.

    But the Obama administration is under pressure from immigrant-rights groups to cut down on the number of people it is deporting and has taken a number of steps to try to limit deportations of rank-and-file illegal immigrants and focus instead on those with criminal records or repeated immigration violations.

    Last week, Mr. Obama said he would halt deportations for most illegal immigrants under 30 who were brought here as children.

    On Monday the administration officials also said they are ending the seven 287(g) task force agreements with Arizona law enforcement officials, which proactively had granted some local police the powers to enforce immigration laws.

    The task forces, named for the section of law that allows them, have proved popular among many localities but have been a political headache for the Obama administration, with immigrant-rights groups saying they led to abuses.

    On Monday the administration officials said they had concluded the seven agreements they had signed with various departments in Arizona weren’t working and took the Supreme Court’s ruling as a chance to scrap them.


    THE THIRD ZIONIST JEW, who is alleged to be a lesbian, is about to be appointed to the bench of the highest court in America.


    If confirmed, (and this is likely given Jewish control of Capitol Hill), Elena Kagan will join her fellow Jews, Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Stephen Breyer, to round out the Zionist trio on the Supreme Court.

    Now in her 3rd day of Senate hearings, Kagan has been “grinning gratuitously and grimacing sourly” throughout the barrage of questions. But, as the Jerusalem Post reports, Kagan has been “holding her own” and confidently cracking “Jewish jokes.”

    Indeed, when asked by the Senate Judiciary committee where she was on Christmas, Kagan replied irreverently — (insulting the majority of Americans who DO celebrate the birth of Jesus Christ) — to an explosion of irreverent laughter: “Like all Jews, I was probably at a Chinese restaurant.”


    King Rothschild Satan's Schwarts
    http://clifylq.livejournal.com/112786.html


    WHILE MOST AMERICANS are asleep to the Zionist threat of a full Jewish takeover of the nation, (Jews keep the Goyim distracted through Blockbuster and Football Extravaganzas), Elena Kagan represents a host of Anti-Americanism positions that the nation has both historically and traditionally eschewed.

    For the record, let’s take a look at where Kagan stands on the issues, PROVING her Anti-Americanism.

    Jewish Agenda: “As participants in American life, judges will have opinions, prejudices, values, and goals. Because this is so, judges will often try to mold and steer the law in order to promote certain social ends. Such activity is not necessarily wrong.”

    — In a speech when acting as the Dean of Harvard Law School, Kagan hailed Israeli Chief Justice Aharon Barak as “my hero,” explaining that her admiration for the Zionist judge was “rooted in her Jewishness and support for Israel.”

    Kagan specified her praise for the Zionist judge: “Aharon Barak is the judge who has best advanced democracy and human rights in Israel.” (Tell that to the Palestinians Kagan…)

    Gun Rights: “I am not sympathetic with the Supreme Court’s ruling that carrying handguns is constitutional.”

    — Kagan wrote a paper for President Clinton that paved the way for an Executive Order banning dozens of semi-automatic weapons.

    Free Speech: “The government can restrict speech if it believes that speech might incite others to do harm. Hate speech would fall into this category of redistribution of speech.”

    – While Kagan seeks to destroy our First Amendment right of free speech, at the same time, she supports the public burning of the US flag as “constitutional.”

    Executive Power: “A strong Executive Branch with control over agencies and regulatory bodies is crucial in order for a President to achieve his or her platform.”

    – Kagan opines that presidential supervision of all federal agencies is a “vital mechanism to achieve progressive goals.”

    Abortion: “Partial birth abortion is the most appropriate procedure to save the life and preserve the health of a woman.”

    — NARAL Pro-Choice America, an abortion advocacy group, endorses Kagan for Supreme Court judge, praising Kagan as a “champion of women’s right to personal choice.”

    Gay Rights: “The US Military’s discrimination against gays is a profound wrong—a moral injustice of the first order.”

    — Kagan’s reported lesbian lifestyle is an “open secret” amongst law students of Harvard University where she has served as Dean of the Law School.

    Immigration Rights: Kagan has asked the Supreme Court to overturn a 2007 Arizona anti-immigration law which revokes the licenses of Arizona businesses that knowingly hire illegal immigrants.

    — It is part of the Zionist agenda to dilute the cultural composition of America’s population in order for Jews to gain supremacy over the nation’s political life.

    SATAN'S TWO SUPREME COURTS OF EVIL IN ISRAEL/ISRAEL'S IN AMERICA ROTHSCHILD MADE
    http://clifylq.livejournal.com/85748.html




    .... http://www/..rense.com/general75/niht.htm


    HOW THE JEWS OPENED AMERICA'S BORDERS

    The following 2 part video is a MUST watch. If you are to ever get a complete understanding of jews and why these creatures must be removed from our midst, why our society is collapsing, and where we are headed you must view the following video.

    Multiculturalism being pushed by jews is not to help any group–it is to destroy our unity and to buffer the jews from the growing dislike of jews by them stirring up racial tensions of all groups against each other–except them, of course.

    Multiculturalism is NOT intended to make us better, just to make us better slaves for the jews as outlined in their vile Talmud. If you still believe in “good” jews that do “good” things for us then please drink some Drano and remove yourself from the gene pool. http://supportbordercontrols.blogspot.com/2010/05/is-america-bankrupt-because-of-wet.html



    ..... http://clifylq.livejournal.com/27917.html


    clifylq

    http://clifylq.livejournal.com/
    http://clifylq.blogspot.com/
    http://www.myspace.com/434997466/blog
    http://supportbordercontrols.blogspot.com/
    http://clifylq.livejournal.com/calendar

    RSS: http://www.opednews.com/populum/author_rss.php?sid=2888




    ROTHSCHILDS ILLUMINATI ULTIMATE GOAL:

    "Ultimately [their goal is] to bring in what people have termed the New World Order with a man who will hold the world's attention and carry the title 'The Antichrist.' That's the ultimate goal and I am not trying to wax religious on people but that's just the simple fact. When you get into deprogramming people you will see that a lot of the things they have been programmed to do tie in with a very sophisticated plan to unify the world under the reign of the Antichrist."

    "The whole long-range goal of this, and when I say long-range, it's not going to take them long to get us there at the rate they are going - the end goal of all of this is to eventually create an entire planet of mind controlled slaves that can be controlled by one super computer. They are manipulating our thoughts and our attitudes, and steering us, herding us (they consider us animals - the Illuminati consider themselves god, god men and us to be the animals) they are herding us in the direction they want to us to go." http://educate-yourself.org/nwo/illuminatiagendabestoverviewyet8jun02.shtml

    Current Mood: angry
    Sunday, June 24th, 2012
    9:52 am
    THE US, ISRAEL, & TOP IRANIAN LEADERS PREPARE FOR IRAN ATTACK STARTING WWIII THE RISE OF ANTICHRST

    http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=19222068&postID=5270266227868797112&isPopup=true




    POWDER KEG: LARGEST JOINT EXERCISE IN MIDDLE EAST HISTORY - TROOPS, TANKS, PLANES AND EVEN RUSSIAN NUCLEAR SUBS


    Posted on June 19, 2012 by

    The Extinction Protocol

    June 19, 2012 – MIDDLE EAST – Iran, Syria, Russia and China are planning the “biggest-ever wargames in the Middle East,” according to an unconfirmed report on the semi-official Iranian news site Fars News. According to the article, the four countries are preparing 90,000 troops, 400 aircraft and 1,000 tanks for the massive joint maneuvers, which are to take place along the Syrian coast within a month. The report states that Russian “atomic submarines and warships, aircraft carriers and mine-clearing destroyers as well as Iranian battleships and submarines will also arrive in Syria” and that Egypt has agreed to let 12 Chinese warships cross the Suez Canal for the exercises. The IDF spokesman’s office called the report a “political matter” and declined to comment. Iran is currently holding talks with six Western powers over the fate of its nuclear program. The talks, said to be held in a tense atmosphere in Moscow, seek to alleviate world concerns that the Islamic Republic is developing nuclear weapons. Syria meanwhile faces international pressure to end a 15-month crackdown on local rebels trying to oust Syrian President Bashar Assad. China and Russia have come to the aid of both countries in recent months at the UN Security Council, vetoing military intervention in Syria and expanded sanctions on Iran. –Times of Israel.


    Russian ship bound for Syria: Britain stops Russian ship carrying attack helicopters for Syria. A Russian ship believed to be carrying helicopters and missiles for Syria has been effectively stopped in its tracks off the coast of Scotland after its insurance was cancelled at the behest of the British government. The British marine insurer Standard Club said it had withdrawn cover from all the ships owned by Femco, a Russian cargo line, including the MV Alaed. “We were made aware of the allegations that the Alaed was carrying munitions destined for Syria,” the company said in a statement. “We have already informed the ship owner that their insurance cover ceased automatically in view of the nature of the voyage.” –Telegraph http://theextinctionprotocol.wordpress.com/2012/06/19/powder-keg-largest-joint-exercise-in-middle-east-history-troops-tanks-planes-and-even-russian-nuclear-subs/



    http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=19222068&postID=7884571245597692081&isPopup=true


    WW3 NUKING OF IRAN BY AMERICAN/ISRAELI FORCES
    http://clifylq.livejournal.com/18222.html


    ABOVE: The pictures of Bush and Ahmadinejad giving the Satanic "goat's head" sign suggest Iranians are as ignorant as Americans of their President's true loyalty. Illuminati defector Leo Zagami recently called Ahmaninejad a "well known Satanist with no real connection to Islam" and the Iraq-Iran-Israel conflict a "foreign intelligence show." Empowered by the central banking cartel, the Illuminati Order has the resources to infiltrate both sides of every conflict, and steer it according to the New World Order agenda. They call this a "dialectical process." They were on both sides of both world wars, the Cold War, Korea and Vietnam. Iran's nuclear ambitions are merely a pretext. The real object is to degrade both the US and Iran so citizens will forfeit political, economic and spiritual rights to Illuminati banker "world government." http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/False%20Religions/Wicca%20&%20Witchcraft/signs/signs_of_satan2.htm

    GOAT OF MENDES:

    The glossary in Watch Network's Be Aware! handbook defines "goathead" as "The Horned God, Goat of Mendes, Baphomet, God of the Witches, the scapegoat. It is a Satanist's way of mocking Christ as the 'lamb' who died for the sins of humanity". Alford's Occult Crimes Investigations defines "Goat Head" as "The symbol for death and is associated with Tammuz". Tammuz was an Assyro-Babylonian vegetation and fertility God who appears as the lover of Ishtar in the Epic of Gilgamesh. There is no mention of goats in any myth associated to him. The animal associated to Tammuz is the boar, not the goat.
    http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/False%20Religions/Wicca%20&%20Witchcraft/origin_of_the_satanic_hand_sign.htm



    http://clifylq.blogspot.com/2012/06/mitt-romney-is-agent-of-state-of-israel.html#comment-form


    THE UNITES STATES PREPARES TO ATTACK IRAN
    (THE IRANIAN THREAT)


    While the Obama Administration is moving forward on the engagement front with Iran, intelligence sources are reporting that he is getting the United States military ready to strike Iran over its nuclear program.

    Israeli intelligence site Debka is reporting that President Obama ordered the US Navy, Air Force, ground, intelligence and special forces units to perform a massive exercise this week in order to simulate an Israeli/US strike on Iran’s nuclear facilities.

    Add that to the build up of carrier strike groups that have been stationed in the Persian Gulf and Mediterranean Sea and you have all the makings for a serious conflict. The United States already has two aircraft carriers in the neighborhood, the USS Abraham Lincoln and the USS Enterprise.

    The United States also moved a squadron of stealth F-22 Raptors to airbases in the United Arab Emirates this week. It is noted by sources that the F-22′s purpose will be to annihilate the Iranian Air Force and air defense systems to pave the way for Israeli and American pilots to completely destroy Iran’s nuclear sites and the infrastructure of the regular army as well as Iran’s revolutionary guards.

    Sources in Washington are also revealing that after the first day of the exercises, Defense Secretary Leon Pannetta reported back to the President the following:

    1. Iran will not respond to the attack by using all it has in its arsenal. The Islamic Republic will want to conserve what is left of its military to defend against a possible secondary American/Israeli strike which is launched to change the regime in Iran.

    2. It will not take very long for the Iranian’s to go back to work on building a nuclear weapon.

    3. After the destruction of its current nuclear program Iran will be more open to dialogue about stopping the program altogether.

    The Iranian Threat is a weekly column by Inquistr writer H. Scott English examining the nuclear standoff between The United States and Iran. The column focuses on in-depth intelligence analysis and sources throughout the world

    Read more at http://www.inquisitr.com/227754/the-united-states-prepares-to-attack-iran-the-iranian-threat/#yk8dDUWhSs5IRqXp.99




    ADDITIONAL RESOURCES:

    THE NEXT PRESIDENT BILLIONAIRES OWN AMERICA
    http://www.rense.com/general75/nextp.htm

    SEE MORE OF ISRAEL'S PRESIDENTIAL TRAITORS TO AMERICA
    http://www.theforbiddenknowledge.com/hardtruth/uspresidentasmasonspt3.htm



    ......... http://clifylq.livejournal.com/45294.html




    US Military Drills Day One After Strike On Iran, Deploys F-22s To Gulf
    Debka.com ^ | May 4, 2012 (Middle East) | Debka.com

    Posted on Thursday, May 03, 2012 2:01:27 PM by Iam1ru1-2

    US Navy, Air Force, ground, intelligence and special forces units based at home, in Europe and the Middle East, took part this week in a special exercise ordered by President Barack Obama to simulate reactions to a potential US-Israel strike on Iran’s nuclear facilities, debkafile’s exclusive military and Washington sources report.

    Sunday, April 22, the US also transferred a number of advanced stealth F-22 fighter bombers, believed to be from the 302nd Fighter Squadron 302, from the joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson in Alaska to the Al Dhafra Air Base in the United Arab Emirates.

    According to our sources, the F-22 jets will join the F-15s of the Massachusetts Air National Guard’s 104th Fighter Wing which were transferred to the Al Udeid base a month ago.

    Their mission will be to destroy the Iranian air force and air defense batteries so as to clear the way for US and Israeli bombers to go into action against Iran’s nuclear sites and the strategic infrastructure of its army and Revolutionary Guards Corps.

    This unprecedented US buildup of air might - supplementing the aircraft on the decks of the USS Abraham Lincoln and USS Enterprise, to be joined by a third carrier as soon as the offensive gets underway – shows Tehran that the Obama administration is serious about using military means as extra pressure on Iran to give way in diplomatic negotiations – both with the six powers and with the US through clandestine channels.

    Both moves took place as the United States and five other world powers prepares for the second round of talks with Iran scheduled for next month to rein in its nuclear program.

    The comment Israel’s chief of staff Lt. Gen. Benny Gantz made to AP on April 26 about “other countries” having readied their armed forces for a potential strike “to keep Tehran from acquiring nuclear weapons” referred to the deployment of the F-22 stealth jets. He did not name the other countries.

    His comment was received in Washington as Israel’s strongest message till now that it will not be alone in attacking Iran but will have partners, presumably the US - and possibly also Britain, France, German, Holland or Italy.

    At the end of the US exercise simulating Day One of this attack, debkafile reports that Defense Secretary Leon Panetta and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Lt. Gen. Martin Dempsey submitted to the White House three conclusions:

    1. Iran’s response to a military strike will be “measured,” both to limit the damage to the regime and to conserve military resources for a possible follow-up attack;

    2. The Iranians will go back to work on building a nuclear weapon within a short time;

    3. The destruction of core elements of its nuclear program is expected to change Iran’s attitude in negotiations, making it less cocky and more submissive to international demands. http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2879582/posts



    http://clifylq.livejournal.com/12979.html


    SATAN -- KINGDOM OF CHAOS AND WARFARE

    While we believe it is possible that Iran may suffer an attack, we strongly believe that such an attack would not overthrow the hardline regime now in power. We base this belief on the following facts:

    1) Iranian government seems protected from overthrow by the Ezekiel 38-39 prophecies

    Persia is foretold in Ezekiel 38-39 as being one of the countries which will march against Israel in the Latter Days, under the leadership of Russia. The government in control at that time has to be anti-West and anti-Israel, precisely as it is today. If President Bush successfully overthrows the present regime, he will institute a puppet government just as he has done in Iraq; this government will be pro-Israel and pro-West. Therefore, we expect that current Iranian government is protected by the prophecy of Ezekiel 38-39 from being overthrown; we may attack their facilities, but it seems to us that the government will be protected from actually being overthrown.

    What has taken us by surprise is the intensity of the forces which have driven Iran into the Russian camp, as she seeks protection from America's sophisticated weaponry. Further, since the prophecy says that Gomer (European nations) is marching with Russia; therefore, American pressure on Iran is resulting in forcing together three major elements of this prophecy: Iran (Persia), Russia, Europe (Gomer).

    2) On April 12, 2003, Russia's Putin warned President Bush that he would not allow any more military strikes, invasions and/or "Regime Changes" in the Middle East. Were America to successfully attack Iran, Russian influence would be totally destroyed.

    However, if the United States decides to attack Iran, Russia may very well intervene with her superior weaponry. Iran is "Persia" in Ezekiel 38-39, and so she is prophetically protected in this war from destruction. If the U.S. does attack Iran in order to change her regime, Russia might very well intervene and, if Col. Weeks and LTC Bearden are correct, might inflict large losses on our naval and air forces. http://www.prahlad.org/pub/bearden/scalar_wars.htm

    The same prophetic situation exists with Libya. Our forces are reportedly ready to fly into Libya to attack and destroy the Iraqi - North Korean nuclear research and production facility located deep within that country. We might be allowed to destroy that facility, but will not seize the land and destroy the government, because Libya is prophesied to march with Russia in the invasion of Israel [Ezekiel 38-39].

    When North Korea attacks South Korea, will she move under the Tesla Dome protection of China? That is certainly plausible. If this is the case, U.S. forces might take heavy casualties.

    So, you see, that cooperation between the key leaders of the world might have its limitations; if the U.S. steps outside these limitations, her armed forces might be destroyed. I have seen strong indications that this World War III has a goal of reducing America to less than superpower status. No U.N. global government can effectively run the world if one nation is a "King Kong". Therefore, if the nation who was so much more powerful than the rest of the nations gets knocked down a few pegs, the U.N. can function a lot more smoothly.

    IF Colonel Byron Weeks and LTC Bearden are correct, American scalar weaponry is primitive enough that our forces are at such a distinct disadvantage to Russian and Chinese scalar weaponry that we literally can attack Iraq only with the consent of Russia and China. Is it any wonder that President Bush is pushing so hard through the United Nations to gain acceptance from the major powers before he attacks Iraq? One of the questions of the hour is whether Bush will call off his attack at the last moment if he does not secure U.N. Security Council approval. Certainly, it looks as though we may not have the weapons capability to strike out on our own, especially if Russia and China really do oppose our efforts.

    However, we must remember that events here are marching according to Biblical prophecy, with the Illuminati Plan is being forced to precisely follow God's prophecies. Therefore, let us begin at the point of reviewing both pertinent prophecy and equivalent New World Order writings.

    Revelation 17:17 -- "For God has put it into their hearts to carry out His own purpose by acting in harmony in surrendering their royal power and authority to the beast, until the prophetic words (intentions and promises) of God shall be fulfilled." [Parallel Bible, KJV/Amplified Bible Commentary]

    Illuminati Plan: "Their script is now written, subject only to last-minute editing and stage-directions. The stage itself, albeit as yet in darkness, is almost ready. Down in the pit, the subterranean orchestra is already tuning up ... Most of the main actors, one suspects, have already taken up their roles. Soon, it will be time for them to come on stage, ready for the curtain to rise. The time for action will have come." [Peter Lemesurier, "The Armageddon Script", p. 252]

    Both this prophecy and this Illuminist passage are telling the same truth. The leaders of this day are "acting" in harmony to stage Antichrist on the world scene, and continue to do so until all the prophetic words of God are fulfilled. The leaders of today are "acting" in complete "harmony" just as one would expect actors to do in a play. The fact of the matter is that all major events have been thoroughly scripted, with Satan ensuring that the minor events and minor actors are following the script. http://cuttingedge.org/news/n1260.cfm

    Oh, the script may call for staged arguments and battling back and forth, but on the main issues of the day, all leaders are acting in concert. We noted this most interesting cooperation over a year ago, and wrote about it in NEWS1548. If you have not yet read this article, please stop to do it now, for it will add greatly to your understanding of this issue.

    The major caveat is that this Illuminist script must follow God's timetable. Even if the Illuminati has its armies, navies, and air forces ready to launch, they will not launch if the timing is not of God. If you see peace suddenly break out, and our forces withdrawn, you know that God's timetable is still in the future.




    SATAN -- KINGDOM OF CHAOS AND WARFARE

    Therefore, the events we are seeing today are scripted, and the leaders of the day just following their prescribed lines. The goal of every one of the major leaders of this day is to so set the stage so the final birth pangs can be induced that will give "birth" to Antichrist. However, once Antichrist is successfully staged on the earth, prophecy abruptly changes, and warfare breaks out. Listen:

    "I considered the [10] horns, and behold, there came up among them another horn, a little one, before which three of the first horns were plucked up by the roots; and behold, in this horn were eyes like the eyes of a man and a mouth speaking great things." [Daniel 7:7-8; Parallel Bible, KJV/Amplified Bible Commentary]

    Notice that, in this 3-step sequence of events we see the following events:

    1. Daniel sees the world reorganizing into 10 super nations -- NOTE: World was reorganized into 10 nations from 1992-96 [Seminar 2]

    2. Antichrist arises -- the 11th horn

    3. Suddenly, three of the ten super nations are totally destroyed, "plucked up by the roots".

    The Bible teaches that, while God is a God of control and stability, Satan's kingdom is one of chaos, war, murder, wrath, and terrible infighting. We have a saying that exemplifies this perfectly: "There is no honor among thieves". In other words, thieves may contemplate a plan amongst themselves to cooperate in carrying out a crime, but once the crime is accomplished and the booty in hand, these same thieves are likely to stab one another in the back in order to seize all the booty for themselves.

    This is the same scenario facing the United States as we contemplate going to war with Iraq. The key leaders of the world are being forced by Bible prophecy to cooperate right now in order to achieve the same goal, i.e., the appearance of Antichrist. However, once he is on the world scene, touting himself as the Messiah of every religion on earth, all bets of cooperation are off. Infighting will begin. I am convinced that this infighting will begin once the Second Seal is opened as described in Revelation 6:3-4.

    A World War III is planned -- and may be just ahead of us -- to fulfill the "birth sorrows" prophecy of Matthew 24:8; out of this war will stride Antichrist. When you see Antichrist on the world scene, know that the First Seal of Revelation 6:1-2 has just been opened. Further know that the cooperation of world leaders has brought about this appearance.

    Now, infighting will break out, as Russia and China will jockey for world domination.

    Infighting Is Possible During World War III That Will Not Change Major Outcome

    In fact, it is very possible that, along the way to achieving the plan to produce Antichrist, infighting could break out in significant ways that, while the achievement of the major goal of producing Antichrist is still reached, might produce some startling and unpredicted events. For example, the Illuminati really covets the control of Ancient Babylon, located just 20 miles north of the 33rd parallel. Therefore, the leaders of the U.N. Security Council are likely to be tremendously focussed on seizing Iraq and taking control over the whole land. A U.S. attack on Iraq will not be actively opposed by China or Russia. We shall certainly probably have spectacular success against Iraq.

    However, if the United States decides to attack Iran, Russia may very well intervene with her superior weaponry. Iran is "Persia" in Ezekiel 38-39, and so she is prophetically protected in this war from destruction. If the U.S. does attack Iran in order to change her regime, Russia might very well intervene and, if Col. Weeks and LTC Bearden are correct, might inflict large losses on our naval and air forces. http://www.prahlad.org/pub/bearden/scalar_wars.htm





    clifylq

    http://clifylq.livejournal.com/
    http://clifylq.blogspot.com/
    http://www.myspace.com/434997466/blog
    http://supportbordercontrols.blogspot.com/
    http://clifylq.livejournal.com/calendar

    RSS: http://www.opednews.com/populum/author_rss.php?sid=2888



    http://clifylq.livejournal.com/56342.html

    Yes, Jesus told us before. He told us by his Word. Jesus who is the Word of God. The prophecy is coming to be fulfilled exactly as the Lord told us. Those of us who hold firm for the testimony that we hold for the Lord of Lords, the Alpha and the Omega will be beheaded by the false-Christ and his minions, those who are liars and call themselves Jew but are of the synagogue of Satan. If we do not worship their Moshiach ben David or their Moshiach ben Lucifer as the god of this world, then we have let the world down. Of course, we have, for we are not of the world and the world does not know us. We are ambassadors of the Kingdom of the Lord most High. Those who fear for their lives will become obedient Noachides under the Sanhedrin ten men who is of the Moshiach ben Luicifer. http://clifylq.livejournal.com/55528.html


    Check google pagerank for clifylq.livejournal.com



    Current Mood: angry
[ << Previous 20 ]
About LiveJournal.com