THE GREAT SATAN ISRAEL CELEBRATES SEPARATION OF CHURCH (JESUS) FROM THE STATE

http://www.watch.pair.com/new-laws.html


Date Posted: 06:27:13 01/31/03 Fri
Author: Leah
Subject: US Government & The Noahide Laws...

The Noahide (Noachide) Laws, or the Seven Universal Laws of Ethics and Morality, (which I'd never even heard of until recently) are similar to the Christian Ten Commandments but do not come from the Holy Bible or Torah (they're from the Talmud which, to my understanding, supposedly contains the teachings of the Pharisees) and are said to be derived from specific passages in the Torah. The Chabad-Lubavitcher's claim that these laws are the very minimal observance for gentiles (non-Jews) to follow.


Menachem Mendel Schneerson Zionist Monkey Burning In The Lake Of Fire LOL
(April 18, 1902 – June 12, 1994), known as The Rebbe[1], was a prominent Hasidic[2] rabbi who was the seventh (and to date, final) Rebbe (spiritual leader) of the Chabad-Lubavitch movement. http://www.voy.com/108170/25.html

What I found to be shocking, beyond belief, is that the birthday of Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson and the Noahide Laws have been WRITTEN INTO LAW here in the US ! The United States Congress and the seven most recent presidents (Nixon, Ford, Carter, Reagan, Bush, Clinton & Bush, Jr.) have USED the guise of "National Education Day," "National Education and Sharing Day U.S.A.," or "Education Day, USA" (the names have varied slightly through the years, same "celebration," though) as an opportunity to pay tribute to Lubavitch Rabbi Schneerson's birthday, to his Lubavitchers and to the Seven Noahide Laws (with their beheadings and animal sacrifices and prohibition of Christianity and separate courts for Jews) that they hope to impose upon the United States and the world. The actual date "National Education Day" is celebrated changes from year to year based on the JEWISH/Babylonian lunar calendar but every year the President of the United States gives a proclamation honoring Rabbi Schneerson and the Noahide Laws. http://www.thewatcherfiles.com/noahide_laws.htm

The law is (House Joint Resolution 104, Public Law 102-14) http://www.public-action.com/x/nh-hjr104/ and it urges us to follow the Noahide Laws as a basis for ethical values. I'm appalled by that ! I question why our presidents did not prefer to urge Americans to follow the Ten Commandments, IF they were going to mention ANY religious laws at all, which is what our CHRISTIAN nation believes, and not some man-made Pharisee laws which endorse


15,000 or 30,000 guillotines had been shipped to
Georgia as well as Montana for safe keeping until
such a time as they are needed for Christians Folks
http://www.remnantofgod.org/guillotines.htm

MURDERING CHRISTIANS FOR BELIEVING IN JESUS CHRIST!


JUDAISM

So what happened to the Supreme Courts ruling on the separation of Church and State? And the Book that the advocates of Judaism adheres to as the precedence of the religion, the Babylonian Talmud says that Jesus is a Bastard and the Son of a Whore!!!!! Wake up Christianity!!!


The Murder Of America
http://www.rense.com/general72/murd.htm

THE GREAT LIE OF THE SUPREME COURTS SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE OF COURSE, ONLY WHEN IT SERVES THEM.

As the concept is commonly understood today, the government has never passed a law implementing the "separation of church and state." The First Amendment simply states:

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof." Over the years, however, the Supreme Court and lower federal courts have reinterpreted this amendment in many ways. This reinterpretation of the Constitution has in effect become the "law" supposedly dictating the "separation of church and state."

Oh, but they have...the 102nd Congress has passed the laws of Judaism, Noachide Laws.
Let's look first at a very brief history of the Courts reasoning and rationale for reinterpretation, and then we'll discuss what the phrase "separation of church and state" means as it is applied in American public policy.

One of the Supreme Court's most blatant violations of the Constitution came about through their reinterpretation of the Bill of Rights - the first ten amendments. Prior to this constitutional violation, the Bill of Rights applied only to the federal government. Notice the actual language of the First Amendment: "Congress shall make no law. . ." As one of many efforts to limit the power of the federal government, the Constitution left authority over religious matters to the States. The Supreme Court consistently adhered to this constitutional principle until well into the twentieth century.

But in the1925 ruling, Gitlow v. New York, the Supreme Court began ignoring its predecessors and precedents. The Court reasoned that one of the purposes of the Fourteenth Amendment was to extend the Bill of Rights to the States. (This would obviously expand the powers of the federal courts to a great degree.) The history of the Fourteenth Amendment does not support their contention, nor do the earlier Courts. Nonetheless, the 1925 Court ignored the historical record and the opinions of their predecessors, establishing a new precedent. Gitlow dealt with freedom of speech and the press; religious matters would soon follow.

In the context of religion, the Court's first and most abusive reinterpretation began in a 1940 Supreme Court ruling, Cantwell v. Connecticut. Here, the Court applied the "free exercise" clause of the First Amendment to the states. Again, religion was a State matter.
State courts were, and are, completely capable of handling the issue. Nevertheless, the Supreme Court, in direct opposition to the original intentions of the Constitution, applied yet another portion of the Bill of Rights to the States. They did not stop there.

The next landmark ruling came down in 1947. In the case, Everson v. Board of Education, the Supreme Court applied the "establishment clause" of the First Amendment to the states. In the context of the "separation of church and state," the Court's foundational reinterpretation of the Constitution was complete. From 1947 forward, the Court has ruled with regularity on religious issues, in direct violation of the original meaning of the First Amendment. Their rulings, and those of lower courts (federal and State) have become the "law" of "separation of church and state."

That was a very brief description of how the federal courts have taken authority over religious issues, reinterpreting the First Amendment and applying it to the States by way of the Fourteenth Amendment. All of this was done in clear violation of the actual wording of the Constitution, as well as the intentions of its framers. The modern concept of
"separation of church and state" can not be justified using the historical record.

We are forced, however, to work with the existing court doctrines. Therefore, what does the phrase mean today as it is applied in American public policy? The First Amendment, which prohibited any "law respecting the establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof," has evolved into something entirely new. During the last generation, the courts, at all levels, have ruled in ways that essentially

GURANTEE THE FREEDOM FROM RELIGION, INSTEAD OF THE FREEDOM OF RELIGION.

"Separation of church and state," as applied to education, means that a prayer at a graduation ceremony is unconstitutional. It also means that students may not pause for a moment of silence at the beginning of their school day. It means that a nativity scene may not be displayed on public property unless there are other displays (e.g. Santa Clause or Christmas trees) that secularize the presentation.

But yet the 102nd Congress, invoked by the Rabbi Menachem Schneerson has instituted this Public Law and Ironically named it the "Education Day" to implement Babylonian Talmudism and the Noachide codes.

Today's conception of "separation of church and state" has also been used to remove historic crosses from public property, and religious symbols from city seals. It has been used to remove the Ten Commandments from courtrooms, even though they are carved in stone within the architecture of the Supreme Court building. The concept has been used to prevent religious expressions on personalized license plates. And these are but a few of the official applications of the concept, or "law" of "separation of church and state."

The hypocrisy of the new Babylonian System which would defile the Ten Commandments in the Public places, has been silently substituted with the so-called Babylonian Talmudic Noachide Laws, and secretly passed by our cemetery leaders and our Congressional leaders as Public Law 102-14

One should understand that "separation of church and state" is not actually a law. It is a doctrine, or a legal concept, that has been implemented by the various courts primarily over the last fifty years. If this concept, as originally understood, would have been applied with consistency over the years, America would certainly be a different country right now.
Religious expression would flourish, and the courts would not be micromanaging the religious life of the American people.

They really meant separation of Jesus Christ and the People of the Lord of Lords and the King Over All, and to replace it with the Babylonian Talmudic Worship system of those who call our Lord a Bastard and the son of a whore in the Babylonian Talmud.

The doctrine of "separation of church and state" has been used, and is being used, to effectively purge religion from the public square. The historical perspective on church/state issues reveals a much different story. The government was to accommodate the religious communities; religion and religious expression were to be encouraged. This is why, for example, the first Congress asked President George Washington to issue a Thanksgiving Proclamation upon completion of the Bill of Rights. Today, that practice would be viewed as unconstitutional. It would violate the "separation of church and state." http://www.samliquidation.com/changing_guard.htm

WHO BACKED THIS EVIL DECISION IN OUR GOVERNMENT AMERICA?

Rep Abercrombie, Neil - 2/27/1991
Rep Andrews, Robert E. - 2/6/1991

Rep Annunzio, Frank - 2/6/1991
Rep Archer, Bill - 2/6/1991

Rep Aspin, Les - 2/27/1991
Rep Bacchus, Jim - 2/27/1991

Rep Ballenger, Cass - 3/5/1991
Rep Bateman, Herbert H. - 3/5/1991

Rep Bentley, Helen Delich - 2/6/1991
Rep Berman, Howard L. - 2/6/1991

Rep Bevill, Tom - 2/6/1991
Rep Bilbray, James H. - 2/27/1991

Rep Bliley, Tom - 2/6/1991
Rep Boehlert, Sherwood L. - 3/5/1991

Rep Borski, Robert A. - 2/27/1991
Rep Boucher, Rick - 2/27/1991

Rep Brewster, Bill K. - 2/27/1991
Rep Broomfield, William S. - 2/27/1991

Rep Brown, George E., Jr. - 2/27/1991
Rep Bruce, Terry L. - 2/27/1991

Rep Bunning, Jim - 2/6/1991
Rep Burton, Dan - 2/27/1991

Rep Bustamante, Albert G. - 3/5/1991
Rep Byron, Beverly B. - 2/27/1991

Rep Camp, Dave - 2/27/1991
Rep Cardin, Benjamin L. - 2/27/1991

Rep Carper, Thomas R. - 2/27/1991
Rep Carr, Bob - 2/27/1991

Rep Chandler, Rod D. - 2/27/1991
Rep Chapman, Jim - 3/5/1991

Rep Clement, Bob - 2/6/1991
Rep Coble, Howard - 2/27/1991

Rep Coleman, Ronald D. - 2/27/1991
Rep Collins, Cardiss - 3/5/1991

Rep Costello, Jerry F. - 3/5/1991
Rep Crane, Philip M. - 3/5/1991

Rep de la Garza, E. - 3/5/1991
Rep de Lugo, Ron - 2/27/1991

Rep DeFazio, Peter A. - 2/27/1991
Rep DeLauro, Rosa L. - 2/27/1991

Rep Dellums, Ronald V. - 3/5/1991
Rep Dicks, Norman D. - 2/27/1991

Rep Donnelly, Brian J. - 2/27/1991
Rep Dornan, Robert K. - 2/6/1991

Rep Duncan, John J., Jr. - 2/6/1991
Rep Dwyer, Bernard J. - 2/27/1991

Rep Dymally, Mervyn M. - 2/27/1991
Rep Early, Joseph D. - 3/5/1991

Rep Eckart, Dennis E. - 2/27/1991
Rep Emerson, Bill - 3/5/1991

Rep Erdreich, Ben - 2/27/1991
Rep Espy, Mike - 2/6/1991

Rep Evans, Lane - 3/5/1991
Rep Fascell, Dante B. - 2/6/1991

Rep Fawell, Harris W. - 3/5/1991
Rep Fazio, Vic - 2/6/1991

Rep Feighan, Edward F. - 2/6/1991
Rep Fields, Jack - 3/5/1991

Rep Fish, Hamilton, Jr. - 3/5/1991
Rep Foglietta, Thomas M. - 2/27/1991

Rep Franks, Gary A. - 3/5/1991
Rep Frost, Martin - 2/27/1991

Rep Gallo, Dean A. - 2/6/1991
Rep Gejdenson, Sam - 3/5/1991

Rep Gekas, George W. - 2/27/1991
Rep Gephardt, Richard A. - 1/31/1991

Rep Gilman, Benjamin A. - 2/27/1991
Rep Gingrich, Newt - 3/5/1991

Rep Gordon, Bart - 2/6/1991
Rep Grandy, Fred - 3/5/1991

Rep Gray, William H., III - 2/27/1991
Rep Green, S. William - 2/27/1991

Rep Guarini, Frank J. - 3/5/1991
Rep Hansen, James V. - 3/5/1991

Rep Harris, Claude - 2/27/1991
Rep Hastert, J. Dennis - 2/27/1991

Rep Hayes, Charles A. - 2/27/1991
Rep Hefner, W. G. (Bill) - 3/5/1991

Rep Henry, Paul B. - 2/6/1991
Rep Hochbrueckner, George J. - 3/5/1991

Rep Horn, Joan Kelly - 2/27/1991
Rep Horton, Frank J. - 2/6/1991

Rep Houghton, Amo - 2/27/1991
Rep Huckaby, Thomas J. (Jerry) - 2/27/1991

Rep Hughes, William J. - 2/27/1991
Rep Hyde, Henry J. - 3/5/1991

Rep Inhofe, James M. - 2/27/1991
Rep Ireland, Andrew P. - 2/6/1991

Rep Jacobs, Andrew, Jr. - 2/27/1991
Rep Jenkins, Edgar L. - 3/5/1991

Rep Johnson, Nancy L. - 3/5/1991
Rep Johnson, Tim - 2/27/1991

Rep Jones, Walter B. - 2/27/1991
Rep Jontz, Jim - 2/27/1991

Rep Kaptur, Marcy - 2/27/1991
Rep Kasich, John R. - 3/5/1991

Rep Kennelly, Barbara B. - 3/5/1991
Rep Kleczka, Gerald D. - 2/27/1991

Rep Klug, Scott L. - 2/27/1991
Rep Kolter, Joseph P. - 2/27/1991

Rep Kopetski, Mike - 2/6/1991
Rep Kostmayer, Peter H. - 3/5/1991

Rep LaFalce, John J. - 2/6/1991
Rep Lagomarsino, Robert J. - 2/27/1991

Rep Lancaster, H. Martin - 3/5/1991
Rep Lantos, Tom - 2/27/1991

Rep Leach, James A. - 2/27/1991
Rep Lehman, Richard H. - 3/5/1991

Rep Lehman, William - 2/27/1991
Rep Lent, Norman F. - 2/6/1991

Rep Levin, Sander M. - 2/27/1991
Rep Lewis, Jerry - 3/5/1991

Rep Lewis, Thomas F. - 2/27/1991
Rep Lipinski, William O. - 2/27/1991

Rep Livingston, Bob - 2/6/1991
Rep Lloyd, Marilyn - 2/6/1991

Rep Long, Jill L. - 2/6/1991
Rep Lowey, Nita M. - 3/5/1991

Rep Machtley, Ronald K. - 3/5/1991
Rep Markey, Edward J. - 2/27/1991

Rep Martin, David O'B. - 2/6/1991
Rep Martinez, Matthew G. - 2/27/1991

Rep Mavroules, Nicholas - 3/5/1991
Rep McCollum, Bill - 2/27/1991

Rep McGrath, Raymond J. - 2/27/1991
Rep McHugh, Matthew F. - 3/5/1991

Rep McNulty, Michael R. - 2/27/1991
Rep Meyers, Jan - 3/5/1991

Rep Miller, John R. - 2/27/1991
Rep Mink, Patsy T. - 2/6/1991

Rep Moakley, John Joseph - 3/5/1991
Rep Molinari, Susan - 2/27/1991

Rep Montgomery, G. V. (Sonny) - 2/6/1991
Rep Moody, Jim - 2/27/1991

Rep Moorhead, Carlos J. - 2/27/1991
Rep Morella, Constance A. - 3/5/1991

Rep Morrison, Sid - 2/27/1991
Rep Mrazek, Robert J. - 3/5/1991

Rep Murphy, Austin J. - 2/27/1991
Rep Nagle, Dave R, - 2/27/1991

Rep Neal, Richard E. - 2/27/1991
Rep Nowak, Henry - 2/27/1991

Rep Oberstar, James L. - 3/5/1991
Rep Obey, David R. - 2/27/1991

Rep Ortiz, Solomon P. - 2/27/1991
Rep Owens, Major R. - 3/5/1991

Rep Pallone, Frank, Jr. - 2/27/1991
Rep Panetta, Leon - 2/27/1991

Rep Patterson, Elizabeth - 2/27/1991
Rep Paxon, Bill - 2/6/1991

Rep Payne, Donald M. - 2/6/1991
Rep Perkins, Carl C. - 2/6/1991

Rep Peterson, Collin C. - 2/27/1991
Rep Peterson, Douglas (Pete) - 2/27/1991

Rep Petri, Thomas E. - 3/5/1991
Rep Pickett, Owen B. - 2/27/1991

Rep Pickle, J. J. - 2/27/1991
Rep Porter, John Edward - 2/27/1991

Rep Poshard, Glenn - 2/27/1991
Rep Price, David E. - 2/27/1991

Rep Quillen, James H. (Jimmy) - 3/5/1991
Rep Rahall, Nick J., II - 2/27/1991

Rep Ramstad, Jim - 2/6/1991
Rep Rangel, Charles B. - 2/27/1991

Rep Ravenel, Arthur, Jr. - 3/5/1991
Rep Regula, Ralph - 2/27/1991

Rep Rinaldo, Matthew J. - 2/27/1991
Rep Ritter, Don - 2/27/1991

Rep Roberts, Pat - 2/6/1991
Rep Roe, Robert A. - 2/27/1991

Rep Roemer, Tim - 2/27/1991
Rep Ros-Lehtinen, Ileana - 2/27/1991

Rep Rose, Charlie - 2/27/1991
Rep Rowland, J. Roy - 2/27/1991

Rep Roybal, Edward R. - 2/6/1991
Rep Russo, Martin A. - 2/27/1991

Rep Sabo, Martin Olav - 2/27/1991
Rep Sangmeister, George E. - 2/27/1991

Rep Santorum, Rick - 2/27/1991
Rep Saxton, Jim - 2/27/1991

Rep Scheuer, James H. - 2/27/1991
Rep Schumer, Charles E. - 2/27/1991

Rep Serrano, Jose E. - 2/27/1991
Rep Sharp, Philip R. - 3/5/1991

Rep Shaw, E. Clay, Jr. - 3/5/1991
Rep Shays, Christopher - 2/27/1991

Rep Shuster, Bud - 3/5/1991
Rep Sisisky, Norman - 3/5/1991

Rep Skaggs, David E. - 2/27/1991
Rep Skeen, Joe - 3/5/1991

Rep Slattery, Jim - 2/6/1991
Rep Smith, Christopher H. - 3/5/1991

Rep Smith, Lamar - 3/5/1991
Rep Smith, Lawrence - 2/27/1991

Rep Smith, Robert - 3/5/1991
Rep Snowe, Olympia J. - 3/5/1991

Rep Solarz, Stephen J. - 2/27/1991
Rep Solomon, Gerald B. H. - 3/5/1991

Rep Spratt, John M., Jr. - 3/5/1991
Rep Stenholm, Charles W. - 3/5/1991

Rep Stump, Bob - 2/6/1991
Rep Swett, Dick - 3/5/1991

Rep Synar, Mike - 2/27/1991
Rep Taylor, G. - 2/27/1991

Rep Thomas, Lindsay - 2/27/1991
Rep Thomas, William M. (Bill) - 2/27/1991

Rep Torricelli, Robert G. - 3/5/1991
Rep Towns, Edolphus - 2/27/1991

Rep Traficant, James A., Jr. - 2/6/1991
Rep Traxler, Bob - 2/6/1991

Rep Unsoeld, Jolene - 2/27/1991
Rep Upton, Fred - 2/27/1991

Rep Valentine, Tim - 2/27/1991
Rep Vento, Bruce F. - 3/5/1991

Rep Walsh, James T. - 2/27/1991
Rep Waxman, Henry A. - 3/5/1991

Rep Weber, Vin - 2/27/1991
Rep Weiss, Ted - 3/5/1991

Rep Wilson, Charles - 2/27/1991
Rep Wise, Robert E., Jr. - 2/27/1991

Rep Wolf, Frank R. - 2/6/1991
Rep Wolpe, Howard E. - 3/5/1991

Rep Wyden, Ron - 3/5/1991
Rep Yatron, Gus - 2/27/1991

Rep Zimmer, Dick - 2/27/1991

IT WAS A UNANIMOUS VOTE AMERICA

224 CONGRESSIONAL TRAITORS TO THE AMERICAN PEOPLE THAT REQUIRE EACH AND EVERY ONE OF THEIR HEADS CUT OFF NOT UNLIKE THEY VOTED TO HAVE DONE TO ALL CHRISTIANS AND ANYONE WHO BELIEVES IN JESUS CHRIST. I WOULD GLADLY BE THE ONE TO PULL THE ROPE FOR EACH ONE OF THESE TRAITORS AND WATCH THEIR HEADS ROLL OFF INTO HELL WITH THEIR BELOVED SATAN AND THEIR/HIS NOAHIDE LAWS. http://www.watch.pair.com/law.html

TO INCLUDE:
Nixon, Ford, Carter, Reagan, Bush, Clinton & Bush, Jr.


clifylq
http://clifylq.livejournal.com/


Rev 20:4-7

4: And I saw thrones, and they sat upon them, and judgment was given unto them: and I saw the souls of them that were beheaded for the witness of Jesus, and for the word of God, and which had not worshipped the beast, neither his image, neither had received his mark upon their foreheads, or in their hands; and they lived and reigned with Christ a thousand years.

Yes, Jesus told us before. He told us by his Word. Jesus who is the Word of God. The prophecy is coming to be fulfilled exactly as the Lord told us. Those of us who hold firm for the testimony that we hold for the Lord of Lords, the Alpha and the Omega will be beheaded by the false-Christ and his minions, those who are liars and call themselves Jew but are of the synagogue of Satan. If we do not worship their Moshiach ben David or their Moshiach ben Lucifer as the god of this world, then we have let the world down. Of course, we have, for we are not of the world and the world does not know us. We are ambassadors of the Kingdom of the Lord most High. Those who fear for their lives will become obedient Noachides under the Sanhedrin ten men who is of the Moshiach ben Luicifer.