Current location:	San Diego
Current mood:	angry
Current music:	Smooth Jazz

AMERICA'S WOMEN ARE CONDEMNED BY GOD TO DEATH SUPPORTING OBAMA/INFANTICIDE, ABORTION, LESBIANISM ETC

..http://clifylq.livejournal.com/88777.html


"Each time he regained heartbeat and respiration, the patient screamed, "I am in hell!" He was terrified and pleaded with me to help him. I was scared to death. . . Then I noticed a genuinely alarmed look on his face. He had a terrified look worse than the expression seen in death! This patient had a grotesque grimace expressing sheer horror! His pupils were dilated, and he was perspiring and trembling — he looked as if his hair was "on end."
Then still another strange thing happened. He said,"Don't you understand? I am in hell. . . Don't let me go back to hell!" . . .the man was serious, and it finally occurred to me that he was indeed in trouble. He was in a panic like I had never seen before."
(Maurice Rawlings, Beyond Death's Door,(Thomas Nelson Inc., 1979) p. 3).


A PHINEAS PRIEST
http://clifylq.livejournal.com/12979.html


"11: And I saw heaven opened, and behold a white horse; and he that sat upon him was called Faithful and True, and in righteousness he doth judge and make war. 12: His eyes were as a flame of fire, and on his head were many crowns; and he had a name written, that no man knew, but he himself. 13: And he was clothed with a vesture dipped in blood: and his name is called The Word of God (Rev. 19).

As someone who has dwelled in the Kingdom and returned to this world to guide others in TheWay, let me convey to you that the sin of abortion is a direct sin against God! Those who abort -- those who champion abortion -- and even those who vote for those who champion abortion --are themselves "DEAD MEN/WOMEN WALKING!" http://brotherofyeshua.com/deadmen.htm

"Be not deceived; God is not mocked. Whatsoever a man sows, that and only that is what he shall reap."


Michelle Robinson, Obama's Wife
http://clifylq.livejournal.com/62126.html

Saturday, September 1, 2007

Obama's C.F.R. Ties Exposed by Swarming Ron Paul Supporters JonesReport.com August 29, 2007

Members of WeAreChange Central Florida descended upon an event for Barack Obama where they exposed his wife Michelle Obama's membership in the Council on Foreign Relations, an elite extra-governmental organization that steers a global agenda within the U.S. framework. http://www.thechicagocouncil.org/chicago_council_board_directors.php

COUNCIL OF FOREIGN RELATIONS AKA CFR & Their Master Plan:"The question of how and why the United Nations is the crux of the great conspiracy to destroy the sovereignty of the United States and the enslavement of the American people within a U.N. one-world dictatorship is a complete and unknown mystery to the vast majority of the American people. The reason for this unawareness of the frightening danger to our country and to the entire free world is simple. The masterminds behind this great conspiracy have absolute control of all of our mass-communications media, especially television, the radio, the press, and Hollywood.
http://clifylq.livejournal.com/32491.html

Posted: July 19, February 2004,

U.S. Senate candidate Barack Obama's wife, Michelle, sent a fund-raising letter with the "alarming news" that "right-wing politicians" had passed a law stopping doctors from stabbing half-born babies in the neck with scissors, suctioning out their brains and crushing their skulls. Michelle called partial-birth abortion "a legitimate medical procedure," and wouldn't supporters please pay $150 to attend a luncheon for her husband, who would fight against "cynical ploy[s]" to stop it?

"SO, THE REASON KEYES SAID JESUS CHRIST WOULDN'T VOTE FOR BARACK OBAMA WAS BECAUSE OF OBAMA'S FANATICAL SUPPORT OF ABORTION TO THE POINT OF CONDONING INFANTICIDE." http://www.rense.com/general81/obbm.htm


Debbie Wasserman Schultz Israeli Nazi Pro Abortion
http://clifylq.livejournal.com/47385.html


Congresswoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz, a former Hillary Clinton supporter, on July 14 addressed the 94th National Convention of Hadassah, the Women's Zionist Organization of America, in support of Senator Barack Obama. http://clifylq.livejournal.com/23815.html

“Barack Obama shares the core values to which we as sisters of Hadassah are committed. Senator Obama is committed to the health and education of women, children and families. He is committed to the protection of our rights and our liberties as Americans and he is committed to the safety and security of Israel. It is these shared core values that drive me to take every opportunity to campaign on his behalf and that places me here before you this morning.” She went on to say that “by every objective measure — voting records, statements, actions — Senator Obama has proven to be an unwavering friend to the State of Israel and a formidable foe to the forces of extremism and anti-Semitism.” http://clifylq.livejournal.com/79631.html
http://archive.constantcontact.com/fs070/1102045959395/archive/1102184607823.html


http://www.rense.com/general71/zzon.htm

Ha Das Sah
http://www.hadassah.org/pageframe.asp?section=about&page=archives/archives_chron1.htHadassah: WOMEN'S ZIONISM

Hadassah is Born.

At a meeting at Temple Emanu-El in New York City, Henrietta Szold, a noted scholar, teacher, journalist, editor, social worker and pioneer Zionist, convinces the Daughters of Zion study circle to expand its purpose and embrace “practical Zionism,” proactive work to help meet the health needs of Palestine’s people. Because the meeting is held around the time of Purim, the women call themselves “The Hadassah chapter of the Daughters of Zion,” adopting the Hebrew name of Queen Esther. Hadassah also means “myrtle,” a hardy Levantine plant with agricultural and biblical significance. Henrietta Szold becomes the first president. http://clifylq.livejournal.com/60081.html


OBAMA SALUTES SATAN "HORNED HAND"
http://clifylq.livejournal.com/88056.html


OBAMA COVER-UP REVEALED ON BORN-ALIVE ABORTION SURVIVORS BILL

The following statement was issued on Monday, August 11, 2008, by the National Right to Life Committee (NRLC) in Washington, D.C.

New documents just obtained by NRLC, and linked below, prove that Senator Obama has for the past four years blatantly misrepresented his actions on the Illinois Born-Alive Infants Protection bill.

Summary and comment by NRLC spokesman Douglas Johnson: "Newly obtained documents prove that in 2003, Barack Obama, as chairman of an Illinois state Senate committee, voted down a bill to protect live-born survivors of abortion -- even after the panel had amended the bill to contain verbatim language, copied from a federal bill passed by Congress without objection in 2002, explicitly foreclosing any impact on abortion. Obama's legislative actions in 2003 -- denying effective protection even to babies born alive during abortions -- were contrary to the position taken on the same language by even the most liberal members of Congress. The bill Obama killed was virtually identical to the federal bill that even NARAL ultimately did not oppose."
In 2000, the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act (BAIPA) was first introduced in Congress. This was a two-paragraph bill intended to clarify that any baby who is entirely expelled from his or her mother, and who shows any signs of life, is to be regarded as a legal "person" for all federal law purposes, whether or not the baby was born during an attempted abortion. (To view the original 2000 BAIPA, click here.)

In 2002, the bill was enacted, after a "neutrality clause" was added to explicitly state that the bill expressed no judgment, in either direction, about the legal status of a human prior to live birth. (The "neutrality" clause read, “Nothing in this section shall be construed to affirm, deny, expand, or contract any legal status or legal right applicable to any member of the species homo sapiens at any point prior to being ‘born alive’ as defined in this section.”) The bill passed without a dissenting vote in either house of Congress. (To view the final federal BAIPA as enacted, click here. To view a chronology of events pertaining to the federal BAIPA, click here.)

Meanwhile, Barack Obama, as a member of the Illinois State Senate, actively opposed a state version of the BAIPA during three successive regular legislative sessions. His opposition to the state legislation continued into 2003 -- even after NARAL had withdrawn its initial opposition to the federal bill, and after the final federal bill had been enacted in August 2002.

When Obama was running for the U.S. Senate in 2004, his Republican opponent criticized him for supporting "infanticide." Obama countered this charge by claiming that he had opposed the state BAIPA because it lacked the pre-birth neutrality clause that had been added to the federal bill. As the Chicago Tribune reported on October 4, 2004, "Obama said that had he been in the U.S. Senate two years ago, he would have voted for the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act, even though he voted against a state version of the proposal. The federal version was approved; the state version was not. . . . The difference between the state and federal versions, Obama explained, was that the state measure lacked the federal language clarifying that the act would not be used to undermine Roe vs. Wade, the 1973 U.S. Supreme Court opinion that legalized abortion."

During Obama's 2008 run for President, his campaign and his defenders have asserted repeatedly and forcefully that it is a distortion, or even a smear, to suggest that Obama opposed a state born-alive bill that was the same as the federal bill. See, for example, this June 30, 2008 "factcheck" issued by the Obama campaign, in the form that it still appeared on the Obama website on August 7, 2008. The Obama "cover story" has often been repeated as fact, or at least without challenge, in major organs of the news media. (Two recent examples: CNN reported on June 30, 2008, "Senator Obama says if he had been in the U.S. Senate in 2002, he, too, would have voted in favor of the Born Alive Infant Protection Act because unlike the Illinois bill, it included language protecting Roe v. Wade." The New York Times reported in a story on August 7, 2008 that Obama "said he had opposed the bill because it was poorly drafted and would have threatened the Supreme Court decision in Roe v. Wade that established abortion as a constitutional right. He said he would have voted for a similar bill that passed the United States Senate because it did not have the same constitutional flaw as the Illinois bill.")

National Right to Life and other pro-life observers have always regarded Obama's "defense" as contrived, since the original two-paragraph BAIPA on its face applied only after a live birth; the "neutrality clause" added in 2001 merely made this explicit, and therefore the new clause did not change the substance of the original bill.

Moreover, the overwhelming majority of liberal, pro-abortion members of the U.S. House of Representatives did not embrace the initial NARAL position that the original bill was an attack on Roe v. Wade. The Democratic members of the House Judiciary Committee, then as now, were a solidly liberal group, yet only one of them voted against the original BAIPA, without the "neutrality clause," and he cited a different reason. Congressman Jerrold Nadler (D-NY), who supported the bill and who described himself as "as pro-choice as anybody on Earth" -- argued that under his understanding of Roe "if an abortion is performed, or a natural birth occurred, at any age, [even] three months, and the product of that was living outside the mother, and somebody came and shot him, I don't think there's any doubt that person would be prosecuted for murder." When the original bill -- with no "neutrality clause" -- came up on the House floor on September 26, 2000, it passed 380-15.
These facts should give pause to those who have unskeptically accepted Obama's claim that the Illinois BAIPA bills that he opposed in 2001 and 2002, which were modeled on the original federal BAIPA, were crafted to attack Roe v. Wade.

For the moment we can set that debate aside, however, for this reason: Documents obtained by NRLC now demonstrate conclusively that Obama's entire defense is based on a brazen factual misrepresentation.

The documents prove that in March 2003, state Senator Obama, then the chairman of the Illinois state Senate Health and Human Services Committee, presided over a committee meeting in which the "neutrality clause" (copied verbatim from the federal bill) was added to the state BAIPA, with Obama voting in support of adding the revision. Yet, immediately afterwards, Obama led the committee Democrats in voting against the amended bill, and it was killed, 6-4.

The bill that Chairman Obama killed, as amended, was virtually identical to the federal law; the only remaining differences were on minor points of bill-drafting style. To see the language of the two bills side by side, click here.

To see the official "Senate Committee Action Report" on this meeting, click on one of the links below. (The document is dated March 12, 2003, which is the day that the committee convened, but Chairman Obama recessed the meeting until March 13, which is the day that these votes actually occurred.)

HERE ARE LINKS TO THE OFFICIAL DOCUMENT THAT RECORDS THESE VOTES, IN THREE DIFERENT FORMATS.

Senate Committee Action Report in HTML (web browser) format
http://www.nrlc.org/ObamaBAIPA/ObamaKills2003amendedBAIPA.htm
Senate Committee Action Report in JPG (photo) format
http://www.nrlc.org/ObamaBAIPA/ObamaKills2003amendedBAIPASenateCommitteeActionReportre.jpg
Senate Committee Action Report in PDF (Adobe document) format
http://www.nrlc.org/ObamaBAIPA/ObamaCoverup.html

In this report, the left-hand column shows the roll call vote on adoption of "Senate Amendment No. 1," which was verbatim the neutrality clause copied from the federal bill. The right hand column shows the roll call by which Obama and his Democratic colleagues then killed the amended bill -- the bill that was virtually identical to the federal law that Obama, starting in 2004, claimed he would have supported if he'd had the opportunity.
To view the text of SB 1082 as it was originally introduced (without the neutrality clause), click here. To view the text of Senate Amendment No. 1 (the neutrality clause copied from the federal law), which Obama and his colleagues added to the bill at the March 13 meeting (before killing the bill), click here.

NRLC has also obtained two additional documents that report information on these events that is fully consistent with the Senate Committee Action Report.

To see the "Senate Republican Staff Analysis: Senate Bill No. 1082," click here. (If this Word document requests a password, simply hit "cancel" and it will be displayed.) The first portion of this analysis was written before the March 12-13, 2003, meeting of the committee that Senator Obama chaired. The committee's actions, amending the bill to exactly track the federal born-alive law, and then defeating the bill, are reported on the bottom half of the second page.)

Finally, to see an Associated Press dispatch dated March 13, 2003, reporting on the 6-4 committee vote that killed the bill, click here.

Less than two years after this meeting, Obama began to publicly claim that he opposed the state BAIPA because it lacked the "neutrality" clause, and that he would have supported the federal version (had he been a member of Congress) because it contained the "neutrality" clause. His claim has been accepted on its face by various media outlets, producing stories that have in turn been quoted by the Obama campaign and Obama defenders in attacking anyone who asserts that Obama opposed born-alive legislation similar to the federal bill. It has also been forcefully repeated by advocacy groups such as NARAL (see, for example, this June 30, 2008 "alert" from NARAL).

It appears that as of August 7, 2008, only one writer -- Terence Jeffrey, a contributing editor to HumanEvents.com -- had correctly reported the essence of this story, in a column posted on January 16, 2008 (read it here), but his report was ignored by the Obama campaign and overlooked by others at the time.

Now, the uncovering of the Senate Committee Action Report and the contemporary Associated Press report shed new light on Senator Obama's four-year effort to cover up his real record of refusing to protect live-born survivors of abortion.

ADDITIONAL RESOURCES:

Index of Documents Regarding Obama Cover-up on Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Bill (will be updated as new items come in) http://www.nrlc.org/ObamaBAIPA/index.html

Timeline of important events in the history of the federal Born-Alive Infants Protection Act
http://www.nrlc.org/ObamaBAIPA/TimelineFederalBAIPA.html

NRLC archive on the federal Born-Alive Infants Protection Act
http://www.nrlc.org/Federal/Born_Alive_Infants/index.html

NARAL press release, July 20, 2000, expressing strong opposition to the original federal Born-Alive Infants Protection Act (H.R. 4292). http://www.nrlc.org/ObamaBAIPA/NARALonliveborn.pdf

The official report of the Judiciary Committee of the U.S. House of Representatives, ( http://www.nrlc.org/ObamaBAIPA/BAIPA2001HJCreport.pdf) explaining the intent of the federal Born-Alive Infants Protection Act (H.R. 2175), and explaining why such legislation was necessary (August 2, 2001)
http://www.nrlc.org/ObamaBAIPA/ObamaCoverup.html


clifylq
http://clifylq.livejournal.com/
http://supportbordercontrols.blogspot.com/



http://www.blogged.com/blogs/clifylq.html
http://www.blogged.com/blogs/awakening-of-america.html


http://clifylq.livejournal.com/61909.html


AMERICA

THE ABOVE COVERED ABORTION AND GOD'S PROMISE OF DEATH TO ANYONE WHO DISOBEYS HIS LAWS. THIS IS HOW GOD FEELS ABOUT THE GAY AGENDA TO INCLUDE LESBIANISM, AND FEMINISM. ALL PUNISHABLE BY HIS DEVINE WRATH SUBJECTING THOSE WHO VIOLATE HIS COMMANDMENTS TO THE FIRES OF HELL FOR ALL ETERNITY. I SAY GOOD RIDDANCE TO THEM ALL!!


CATHOLIC NEWS AGENCY
3-March-2008

Obama Promises To Dedicate Presidency to Homosexual Activism
Washington DC, Mar 1, 2008 (CNA).- Presidential candidate Senator Barack Obama has promised to use the presidency as a “bully pulpit” for homosexual activism, according to an open letter released on his campaign website.

In the February 28 letter posted under the “LGBT” section of the “People” heading, Senator Obama said he would press for the passage of hate crime laws and a “fully inclusive” Employment Non-Discrimination Act, which would outlaw discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity. http://clifylq.livejournal.com/15821.html


GAY MARRIAGE IS A SIN

Any child knows that God created Adam and Eve; NOT, Adam and Steve! The very notion of two homosexuals getting married is repulsive and disgusting. In Romans 1:26 God calls homosexual "love"... vile affections, i.e., morally reprehensible affections. God's Word condemns homosexuality, which is why Sodomites today are relentlessly trying to corrupt the Bible. Romans 1:25 told us they'd do this, "Who changed the truth of God into a lie..." http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/Bible/new_oxford_annotated_bible.htm

GOD SAYS HOMOSEXUALITY IS MORALLY REPREHENSIBLE!

Let the truth be known... homosexuality is a menace to society and undermines the moral integrity of a nation. God will not be mocked! Homosexual lust is not love. In Romans 1:26, God calls such lusts, "vile affections." "Vile" means "morally reprehensible." Homosexual affections are MORALLY REPREHENSIBLE! If Rosie O'Donnell wants to label Christians like me as "radical" because we believe the Word of God, then I'm proud to be radical for my Lord. O'Donnell wouldn't be calling Christ-honoring Christians "radical" if it weren't for the compromised, weak, cowardly, carnal, apostate, so-called "Christians" who have become homo-friendly. Did you know that Christianity Today is homosexual-friendly? Christianity Today teaches teens that it's "normal" to be confused about sexual feelings, and that "Some same-sex activity or experimentation does not automatically mean that you are gay." Can you believe what you are reading... this is from Christianity Today!!! Why should God have mercy on this wicked nation? I believe God says to men of God today, the same Words He spoke to Jeremiah concerning Israel... http://clifylq.livejournal.com/83369.html

"Therefore pray not thou for this people, neither lift up cry nor prayer for them, neither make intercession to me: for I will not hear thee" (Jeremiah 7:16). http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/Evils%20in%20America/Sodomy/frightening_gay_statistics.htm


HELL IS 24/7 LADIES JUST FOR YOU
http://www.av1611.org/hell.html